***Official Political Discussion Thread***

Again, show me in recent history where I've called people sheep. For sure did that in 2011-ish. Been a long time for me.

However, I've seen you **** on Libertarians, anarchists, Republicans and anything else that isnt Democrat. Dont try to pretend like your open to dialogues. Your very comfortable in your Democratic suit you identify yourself with and i dont think thats gonna change brosef.

You're only seeing what you want to see

Rusty has expressed his issues with the Dems many times
 
Sheep, echo chamber, however you want to phrase is it semantics. You really do have this holier than thou attitude that somehow since you have all these nutty conspiracy theories and are so outside of the norm, that somehow guess you license to shame those who "group-think" or use actual logic. Nah man, just makes you look like the cooky, crackpot troll that you've proven to be and nobody will ever take you seriously.
 
Last edited:
Nah the ecgo chamber is team democrat. Yall push out any one with an opposing view.

I dont understand how reacho and ninja lasted this long.
 
Im curious. .if he loses ,what will you say?

between da daily wikileaks, da viral evangelist bernie supporter who's now on da Trump train and now da exposed DNC coordinated astro turfin' and voter fraud #birddogging videos thats blowing up & trending twitter as we speak, i wouldn't be so sure "if" applies..
 
Again, show me in recent history where I've called people sheep. For sure did that in 2011-ish. Been a long time for me.

However, I've seen you **** on Libertarians, anarchists, Republicans and anything else that isnt Democrat. Dont try to pretend like your open to dialogues. Your very comfortable in your Democratic suit you identify yourself with and i dont think thats gonna change brosef.

You're only seeing what you want to see

Rusty has expressed his issues with the Dems many times

his complaints that da Democrats aren't left enough for his taste are well known around these parts :lol
 
Again, show me in recent history where I've called people sheep. For sure did that in 2011-ish. Been a long time for me.

However, I've seen you **** on Libertarians, anarchists, Republicans and anything else that isnt Democrat. Dont try to pretend like your open to dialogues. Your very comfortable in your Democratic suit you identify yourself with and i dont think thats gonna change brosef.

You're only seeing what you want to see

Rusty has expressed his issues with the Dems many times

his complaints that da Democrats aren't left enough for his taste are well known around these parts :lol

You are a liar
 
Again, show me in recent history where I've called people sheep. For sure did that in 2011-ish. Been a long time for me.

However, I've seen you **** on Libertarians, anarchists, Republicans and anything else that isnt Democrat. Dont try to pretend like your open to dialogues. Your very comfortable in your Democratic suit you identify yourself with and i dont think thats gonna change brosef.

You're only seeing what you want to see

Rusty has expressed his issues with the Dems many times

his complaints that da Democrats aren't left enough for his taste are well known around these parts :lol

You are a liar

u not fooling anyone sir...you've shown ur hand that you would prefer that da Democrats have a super major..when most people in da United States want divided government because they want da checks & balances.
 
@BraddJaffy:
Trump is bringing Obama's half-brother to the debate, @KatyTurNBC reports
700
 
Again, show me in recent history where I've called people sheep. For sure did that in 2011-ish. Been a long time for me.

However, I've seen you **** on Libertarians, anarchists, Republicans and anything else that isnt Democrat. Dont try to pretend like your open to dialogues. Your very comfortable in your Democratic suit you identify yourself with and i dont think thats gonna change brosef.

You're only seeing what you want to see

Rusty has expressed his issues with the Dems many times

his complaints that da Democrats aren't left enough for his taste are well known around these parts :lol

You are a liar

u not fooling anyone sir...you've shown ur hand that you would prefer that da Democrats have a super major..when most people in da United States want divided government because they want da checks & balances.

This comment has nothing to do with your original claim.

My main reason I want Dems to have a super majority is because GOP obstructionism. And i have listed plenty of other reasons why I want it.

Lastly, not all Dems are the same, they come in all different flavors, and compromises have to be made within the party too.

Checks had balances can still exist with a one party super-majority. Especially if it is the Dems
 
Last edited:
My main reason I want Dems to have a super majority is because GOP obstructionism

voters voted FOR GOP obstructionism, or did u forget about da record Democratic losses of Congress seats between 2010 & 2014?

Checks had balances can still exist with a one party super-majority. Especially if it is the Dems

spoken like a true commie :lol :{

like i said you're gripes with Democrats is u want them as pursuit & left as possible.
 
*cough* years ago some folks were taken to court for things u were complaining about a few mins ago *cough*


And what does this have to do with anything? I was laughing at the idea that the black thanksgiving thread was bordering on black supremacy. That's ridiculous nonsense.
But since you want to bring up voter intimidation, you've made it crystal clear you support minority voter disenfranchising. Or do I need to go find those quotes of you defending voter ID laws and denying that any racial targeting could be involved in them?
You're quiet as a mouse on fellow latinos and blacks being disenfranchised by the GOP but let there be one small case of black panther members arrested for voter intimidation and you're all over it. You're not fooling anyone.
 
voters voted FOR GOP obstructionism, or did u forget about da record Democratic losses of Congress seats between 2010 & 2014?
spoken like a true commie :lol :{

like i said you're gripes with Democrats is u want them as pursuit & left as possible.
Judging by congress' approval ratings during Obama's presidency, particularly during the largest cases of obstruction, voters seemed pretty disgusted with them.
 
Last edited:
giphy.gif


Lol what

DEMS in 2000: Bush defeats Gore - It's VOTER FRAUD !!!

DEMS in 2016: There's never been a case of voter fraud. It doesn't exist.

Trump is wrong about voter fraud against him in this election but come on. How do people buy this nonsense?
The entire 2000 election and the fate of the country of 300 million people, as well as the entire world was decided by literally a little over 500 votes in a state where the brother of the eventually winning candidate was the governor.

The 2016 election hasn't even taken place yet and The Bigot is trying to crybaby his way out of a concession speech, being the sore loser that he is. And his crying is completely based on various polls and projections that give him no chance of winning whatsoever or even being close to doing so. If there are cases of legit fraud, they are merely grains of sand when it comes to the big picture, which is pretty clear as to who the more favorable candidate is.

The 2000 election deserved to be looked into as possible fraud exclusively on being as insanely close as it was and the fact that the losing candidate won the popular vote. There was a legit reason to be suspicious. The 2016 election doesn't look like it will even be close, either in the electoral vote or the popular vote. It is clear who the people of the country want as president. Or more appropriately put as far as this election is concerned who they don't want as president.

#StaySalty
 
Last edited:
My main reason I want Dems to have a super majority is because GOP obstructionism

voters voted FOR GOP obstructionism, or did u forget about da record Democratic losses of Congress seats between 2010 & 2014?

Checks had balances can still exist with a one party super-majority. Especially if it is the Dems

spoken like a true commie :lol :{

like i said you're gripes with Democrats is u want them as pursuit & left as possible.

Should I report this name calling like you have been reporting me? :lol

And I have no idea how that makes me a communist. But then again, you probably don't really know what communism is, soooo

And if people voted for GOP obstructionism, why are those people voting Trump to make America great again and complaining Obama has done nothing.

-But still, you're lying, and throwing out strawmen to pedal a BS talking point.
 
Last edited:
Nah the ecgo chamber is team democrat. Yall push out any one with an opposing view.

I dont understand how reacho and ninja lasted this long.

They lasted because they offer their opinions and then actually defend them instead of throwing out vague criticisms from a high horse

I doubt you'd have a problem with the "echo chamber" if everyone was saying "both candidates are equally bad" and "voting is useless"
 
Judging by congress' approval ratings during Obama's presidency, voters seemed pretty disgusted with the obstruction.

Once again nonsense ninja conflating two different things:

GOP takeover of Congress was due to much lower voter turnout than during the general which we've acknowledged at nauseam; and the GOP suppression and gerrymandering of districts to put the constituency to their advantage. You really think people want Congress NOT to do their job? And funny thing is according to polls voters would prefer a Democratic Congress right now.
 
Last edited:
McCain speaking out both sides of his mouth.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...clinton-supreme-court-20161017-story,amp.html

Looks like they still won't play ball after Nov 8.

Must be nice to refuse to do your job n still get paid with lavish benefits

That's what not having term limits does: it incentivizes keeping your seat at the trough instead of working to make American lives better. This is exarcerbated by the reliance on private donors to sustain one's political career. We need to reform the way Congress works so that it puts us first. We need to amend the constitution to introduce term limits for all elected officials. Presidents worry more about their legacies because of that. Congresspeople don't.

*Cough*

Donald Trump calls for congressional term limits to end ‘cycle of corruption’

By Jenna Johnson Post PoliticsOctober 18 at 4:01 PM
Trump calls for term limits for members of Congress Play Video1:08

During a rally in Colorado, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump pledged to introduce a constitutional amendment that would impose term limits on members of Congress. (The Washington Post)
COLORADO SPRINGS — In his latest proposal to “drain the swamp” in Washington, Donald Trump on Tuesday called for an amendment to the Constitution to implement term limits on members of Congress.

Trump has previously suggested he wants term limits, and on Tuesday he provided no details on what the limitation would be or how he would go about pushing for the constitutional amendment. But Trump said that term limits and other reforms are needed to “end the cycle of corruption” in Washington.

“The time for congressional term limits has finally arrived. Not only will it end our government corruption, but we will end the economic stagnation that we're in right now. No growth,” Trump said at a rally at the Norris-Penrose Event Center here in Colorado Springs on Tuesday afternoon.

The night before, Trump introduced a series of reforms on lobbying in Washington during a rally in Green Bay, Wis. Trump said that he would ban executive branch officials from becoming lobbyists for five years after leaving the government and would never allow senior officials to lobby on behalf of a foreign government. Trump said he would ask Congress to pass a similar ban for former members of Congress and their staff members. Trump said he would also expand the definition of lobbyist to include those who label themselves as consultants and advisers and would push for campaign finance reform to prevent registered foreign lobbyists from raising money in U.S. elections

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...sional-term-limits-to-end-cycle-of-corruption
 
voters voted FOR GOP obstructionism, or did u forget about da record Democratic losses of Congress seats between 2010 & 2014?

Gerrymandering, data mining, voter supression and shady practices led to the GOP to control the senate.
 
Last edited:
My main reason I want Dems to have a super majority is because GOP obstructionism

voters voted FOR GOP obstructionism, or did u forget about da record Democratic losses of Congress seats between 2010 & 2014?

Checks had balances can still exist with a one party super-majority. Especially if it is the Dems

spoken like a true commie :lol :{

like i said you're gripes with Democrats is u want them as pursuit & left as possible.

Should I report this name calling like you have been reporting me? :lol

And I have no idea how that makes me a communist. But then again, you probably don't really know what communism is, soooo

And if people voted for GOP obstructionism, why are those people voting Trump to make America great again and complaining Obama has done nothing.

-But still, you're lying,

u just said u want a Democratic super majority, nuke da filibuster, and with a straight face said "check & balances can still be had" Comrade Rusty w/ dat commie logic :lol :{
 
Originally Posted by Colombia View Post

Judging by congress' approval ratings during Obama's presidency, voters seemed pretty disgusted with the obstruction.

they were so disgusted da voters helped trouce democrats outta congress in record numbers in da midterms..
 
My main reason I want Dems to have a super majority is because GOP obstructionism

voters voted FOR GOP obstructionism, or did u forget about da record Democratic losses of Congress seats between 2010 & 2014?

Checks had balances can still exist with a one party super-majority. Especially if it is the Dems

spoken like a true commie :lol :{

like i said you're gripes with Democrats is u want them as pursuit & left as possible.

Should I report this name calling like you have been reporting me? :lol

And I have no idea how that makes me a communist. But then again, you probably don't really know what communism is, soooo

And if people voted for GOP obstructionism, why are those people voting Trump to make America great again and complaining Obama has done nothing.

-But still, you're lying,

u just said u want a Democratic super majority, nuke da filibuster, and with a straight face said "check & balances can still be had" Comrade Rusty w/ dat commie logic :lol :{

The nuclear option doesn't get rid of a filibuster completely Lil Eddy. If lowers the number of votes needed to end one.

And I said i was comfortable with the GOP being able to use it if they gain power. Guess you missed that part.

And i guess you didn't pass Government in High School. If the president and Congress disagree and the President vetoes a bill what is that. Kinda like how Obama and Dems disagree with the TPP and the suing of Saudi Arabia. And look at the public option was killed. Or what if the Supreme Court deems a law unconstitutional.

Checks and Balances are built into our system of government, they still exist even with a super majority.

And like I said, not all Democrats are the same. Even the party platform was a compromise between different factions of the party.

Stop making yourself look stupid by not being able to grasp simple concepts, then using a " :lol " to look in control. It is not working.

-BTW, Once again you don't know what communism it. You're just making yourself look sill with the commie talk
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom