- 151,164
- 202,581
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- 64,966
- 196,177
A lot of dudes are gonna be for this
Looking at the Kevin Samuels thread, I would guess there will be a lot of supporters of this on NT.
- 151,164
- 202,581
- 151,164
- 202,581
and they have zero clue how it would actually work out
so take trump.. infidelity would be used as the reason for the divorce and whomever he cheated with would be named in the action and evidence would have to be given and all that
- 64,966
- 196,177
They just want to stop women from getting a divorce by saying there are irreconcilable differences within the marriage.
So for them to get a divorce they have to prove some kind of misconduct by their husband. Adultery, abuse, etc.
So if you are a ****** husband or you verbally abuse your wife, she can't gotta say married to you.
- 151,164
- 202,581
abuse is one of the grounds, just goes to court and have to give evidence and it’s not just physical abuse
but divorce is expensive in our system and the payouts aren’t anywhere near as close to what happens in the states
but given how publicly horrible these dudes are, don’t imagine finding evidence would be hard.. it’s just typical them trying rig the system with conservative judges
- 151,164
- 202,581
i assume them same dudes going want to get rid of martial rape laws soon too
- 151,164
- 202,581
- 151,164
- 202,581
- 7,091
- 5,385
- 8,703
- 8,710
Pretty cool seeing a super power crumble from within.
- 151,164
- 202,581
- 151,164
- 202,581
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 33,926
- 81,154
- 151,164
- 202,581
- 18,386
- 34,061
I'm sure the libs will somehow twist his words to make it sound like this is bad, but it's refreshing to see your hero in a moment of thoughtful reflection. when was the last time somebody like Anderson Cooper talked about how fantasizing about a mob beat a defenseless kid to death was maybe not cool?
coal >
- 26,830
- 38,449
Last edited by a moderator:
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 33,926
- 81,154
- 14,955
- 36,300
Who the **** does the job of editing at the NYT?
Did they really think that quoting "this is not how white men fight" was more poignant than what
Belgium
highlighted? It's only surprising to those who think Tucker isn't a white supremacist, and it looks like the higher ups of these media companies still don't take the threat of the right wing media machine seriously.That's very problematic. These people mean what they say because they are acting on their threats.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 151,164
- 202,581
- 55,498
- 147,075
Who the **** does the job of editing at the NYT?
Did they really think that quoting "this is not how white men fight" was more poignant than what
That's very problematic. These people mean what they say because they are acting on their threats.
It’s 100% a “limited hangout”.
Another example of this, was a day ago…when they released this “exclusive” “leak” about Tucker. All designed to make him & Fox look good, overall.
Look at how the intended audience is reacting:
They’re. All. In. On. It
Last edited by a moderator:
- 21,641
- 10,257
In no seriousness whatsoever...Tucker runs for President now...he wins the nomination over Trump?
- 64,966
- 196,177
- 34,115
- 29,458
Its funny how the media over indexes on secret information.
Tucker said worse stuff on his show every night.
Trump constantly exploited this blind spot by simply announcing his crimes in public.
Media loves secret information even if the information being revealed is totally not a secret.
- 15,591
- 8,376
I think he’d win it over DeSantis
Similar threads
