- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,966
- 196,177
He DOES have the will of the people, by the system that determines the presidency. What are you talking about a strawman? The popular vote in the 2016 election is meaningless. Fact. Thats NOT the current system. Fact.No it is not. Miss me with this strawman
It was brought up before to argue against Trump having a mandate, or his presidency reflects the will of the people.
I have even given you alternative reasons why it is bad, ones you seemed to have completely ignored out of convenience
Moving to popular vote, if it every happening, doesn't guarantee or make more likely any of the things you listed.
Holding onto a strawman after strawman seems to be your only tactic in this debate.
The "2 million lead" some of you want to talk about has no relevancy. Thats not to say that there can't be discussion about its merits, but it is completely and utterly irrelevant to the 2016 election, and a good chunk of the discussion is certainly happening because we don't like that Trump won.
Any changes to the current method wouldn't be straightforward. States have inconsistent laws regarding voting that would have to get changed, things would get more standardized, probably a bit tighter overall. The Electoral College allows for the inconsistency and puts more powers in the states hands, but it wouldn't work in a direct vote. It would get way more federal, and considering who's in charge there, I'd argue they could easily make it worse off than you'd want.
-You're not listening to what people are saying FACT.
-You're just running you mouth because you feel you're schooling people. FACT
-The election was decided by 100,000 votes in three states. FACT
-Liberal have had problem with the system since 2000. That was over spilled milk, but still, how that work out for America. Not very well. FACT
-Lower populated states get a disproportional amount of electoral college votes than large ones because the number of electors is locked. This happen in 1929, and as a result have given rural areas more power FACT
-Most states don't give electoral out votes proportionately and that makes it less representative. FACT
-Million of America citizens who lives are affect by the president, and disenfranchises by the popular vote. FACT
-So get you head out the sand and stop thinking we hare just bringing this up to complain about Hillary not winning. That is not why we have been bringing it up, that is where you building the straw man. Pedaling the idea that his discussion was just about spilled milked. You wrong. FACT
-The electoral college is not to meant to represent the will of the people. In fact it is meant to be a firewall against people electing a reckless leader. It is meant to do against the will of the people if need be. FACT
That is why is doesn't present the will of the people, not only because it is a direct election (the Electoral College isn't bound by any law to follow state votes) but more people that voting wanted one candidate over the other. I am fully aware of this is the system, I fully accept it, and but that fact still remains. We don't have to go to popular vote, but that doesn't mean the problems with the electoral college shouldn't be ignored. Geez
And the discussion regarding this since election day has always had more to do with Trump's political capital than anything else.
And just yesterday I said I didn't want to see a recount because Trump won and people have to accept that. So ******* miss me with this bull **** straw man that I am just crying over spilled milk when you won't even stop, get your head out the sand and listen to my other point regarding the failings of the system.
And if you're just gonna talk past me again. I couldn't care less what less you have to say on this subject, with your silly Trump memes. FACT
Last edited: