***Official Political Discussion Thread***

this whole uproar over people being paid to give speeches is dumb. first it was Hillary, now Obama. people get upset when liberals make money legally from willing payers but they're happy when trump frauds innocent people with every new undertaking.
 
[thread="509493"]Guess he would know what's distasteful considering his wife's fed investigation[/thread]

His wife sounds like a damb Alt-right person at times.

Apparently she hates having to be "politically correct", I wonder what that means :rolleyes
 
Last edited:
this whole uproar over people being paid to give speeches is dumb. first it was Hillary, now Obama. people get upset when liberals make money legally from willing payers but they're happy when trump frauds innocent people with every new undertaking.

I saw Obama speak at the air force academy graduation last year... hands down one of the best speeches I have ever seen. I'd pay good money to watch him speak again. I don't understand why people would be upset.
 
 
this whole uproar over people being paid to give speeches is dumb. first it was Hillary, now Obama. people get upset when liberals make money legally from willing payers but they're happy when trump frauds innocent people with every new undertaking.
I saw Obama speak at the air force academy graduation last year... hands down one of the best speeches I have ever seen. I'd pay good money to watch him speak again. I don't understand why people would be upset.
It's not the speaking. It's not even the paid speaking. It's how much he's getting paid for it.

It's not enough that he's going to continue to be an uppity negro, he's also gonna be a rich uppity negro.
 
Sam Harris is officially a white supremacist in my book.

I used to think it was ignorance, or poor understanding of statistics, but dude Charles Murray onto his podcast and left him spew his ignorance and even cosigned it at times.

He acts like something at has been debunked as race baiting nonsense and is a favorite of true to the game vile white supremacist is just the left attacking free speech.

**** that dude.
 
Last edited:
We got George W. Bush profiting off of acid trip finger paintings but Obama can't do some speeches? 
mean.gif
 
Sam Harris is officially a suspected white supremacist in my book.

I used to think it was ignorance, or poor understanding of statistics, but dude Charles Murray onto his podcast and left him spew his ignorance and even cosigned it at times.

He acts like something at has been debunked as race baiting nonsense and is a favorite of true to the game vile white supremacist is just the left attacking free speech.

**** that dude.
Took you this long? 
laugh.gif
 Dude been suspect in my eyes 
laugh.gif
 
Bernie looks realllllllly suspect in the light.

Bernie has always looked funny in the light. The thing was some, including me, where willing to put that aside because they were willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

But he has a bad habit of confirming worst fears about him.
 
Sam Harris is officially a suspected white supremacist in my book.

I used to think it was ignorance, or poor understanding of statistics, but dude Charles Murray onto his podcast and left him spew his ignorance and even cosigned it at times.

He acts like something at has been debunked as race baiting nonsense and is a favorite of true to the game vile white supremacist is just the left attacking free speech.

**** that dude.

Sam Harris been suspect since the Glenn Loury talk he did about racism in America.

Dude is a douchebag. And he loves the phrase "identity politics".

Son needs to stick to bashing religion and stroking his own ego cuz every time I've seen or heard him speak on racism, he makes himself look like a whole entire uneducated privileged moron.

With that "the only identity we need is homo sapien" ********.
 
Sam Harris is officially a suspected white supremacist in my book.


I used to think it was ignorance, or poor understanding of statistics, but dude Charles Murray onto his podcast and left him spew his ignorance and even cosigned it at times.


He acts like something at has been debunked as race baiting nonsense and is a favorite of true to the game vile white supremacist is just the left attacking free speech.


**** that dude.

Took you this long? :lol  Dude been suspect in my eyes :lol

I edit my post, he is a white supremacist. I suspected him before. I changed the structure of the sentence and didn't edit it properly before I posted it.

Before I just blamed how poorly he read statistics. I can tell he has no idea what a regression is, dude reads summary statistics and thinks he is doing it. And he sounds like an *** on many topics not just race

But the dude got a Blco level resume of racial ignorance at this point.
 
Last edited:
 
this whole uproar over people being paid to give speeches is dumb. first it was Hillary, now Obama. people get upset when liberals make money legally from willing payers but they're happy when trump frauds innocent people with every new undertaking.


I saw Obama speak at the air force academy graduation last year... hands down one of the best speeches I have ever seen. I'd pay good money to watch him speak again. I don't understand why people would be upset.

It's not the speaking. It's not even the paid speaking. It's how much he's getting paid for it.
It's not enough that he's going to continue to be an uppity negro, he's also gonna be a rich uppity negro.
Yup.

Same people who run their ******* mouths saying that black athletes make too much money (if you prod them, you'll get their true feelings, which is that athletes don't deserve to get paid millions of dollars because they're just dumb monkeys running around).

And of course those same people praise a fraud like trump for scamming people out of billions of dollars.

Same people who are anti-communism and call Obama a socialist but the minute a black man makes lots of money in sports or music, they're first in line to bring them down, talking about how they don't contribute to society like a doctor or schoolteacher so how dare they make more money.

**** them
 
Last edited:
 
this whole uproar over people being paid to give speeches is dumb. first it was Hillary, now Obama. people get upset when liberals make money legally from willing payers but they're happy when trump frauds innocent people with every new undertaking.


I saw Obama speak at the air force academy graduation last year... hands down one of the best speeches I have ever seen. I'd pay good money to watch him speak again. I don't understand why people would be upset.

It's not the speaking. It's not even the paid speaking. It's how much he's getting paid for it.
It's not enough that he's going to continue to be an uppity negro, he's also gonna be a rich uppity negro.
Yup.

Same people who run their ******* mouths saying that black athletes make too much money (if you prod them, you'll get their true feelings, which is that athletes don't deserve to get paid millions of dollars because they're just dumb monkeys running around).

And of course those same people praise a fraud like trump for scamming people out of billions of dollars.

Same people who are anti-communism and call Obama a socialist but the minute a black man makes lots of money in sports or music, they're first in line to bring them down, talking about how they don't contribute to society like a doctor or schoolteacher so how dare they make more money.

**** them

I can't rep this enough
 
Oh now there's an issue with the paid speeches despite this being a staple of every past President's life? even Trump's rambling, incomprehensible *** will command the same.
 
Yeah, I was under the impression that former presidents giving paid speeches was accepted as the norm a long time ago.

Wonder what makes this different.[emoji]129300[/emoji]
 
The relationship between the financial services sector and politics is troubling no matter what you look like. The idea that President Obama's ties to Wall Street are innocuous because he is a black man is a one of the rare instances of "playing the race card."

Normally an accusation of playing the "race card" is false because the accuser is not seeking material gain and is setting a social and political issue in its proper context, which is the relentless white supremacy that pervades American society and politics. In the specific case of Obama and his speaking fees, pointing out his blackness is a non sequitur.

Now with that said, Barack Obama is about the last political figure to worry about when it comes to huge speaking fees from big business. Unlike Hillary Clinton and every Republican on the planet, Barack Obama is not seeking to become President so the revolving door, the quid pro quo is not something that could even happen.


More broadly, I do remind my progressive friends three things about Barack Obama. One is the obvious obstruction whose intensity was largely fueled by white supremacy. There is the other thing and that is the fact that Barack Obama did not campaign as a strong progressive, he campaigned as a left of center politician and during those brief windows where he had a Democratic Congress, he delivered good center left policy which was unambiguously to the left of Bill Clinton's "triangulation." The third thing to recon for is the fact that one of the many aspects of white privilege is that white guys can have far left politics and forceful language and not be seen as a traitor or a menace to their society. A black man or a white women cannot be, publicly at least, as outspoken as a Bernie Sanders.

So, whatever, Obama's speaking fees post presidency are a non issue. What we really need to care about are the speaking "fees" for politicians who are still in the game.
 
Last edited:
this is one reason why i detest the idiotic argument that electing a rich man (trump) to the presidency is a good idea because he won't need to profit off it.

becoming president is an automatic insurance policy that you and your offspring will be financially well off for the rest of your lives. it doesn't matter if you're Bernie Sanders or don trump.

this is ignoring the other major problem with the argument, where trump apologists claim that he already has enough money so he won't be greedy anymore. that's some first grader naivete right there.

one other comment on Obama speaking: he's one of the great orators of our time. even if he wasn't president his speeches would be worth a lot of money. granted, they wouldn't be worth $400k a pop, but I've seen fraudulent megachurch pastors and motivational speakers who can't hold a candle to Obama make millions by speaking.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom