***Official Political Discussion Thread***

[cl-1b]

 
I'm a conservative....

Nobody brands me as a racist

conservative my A**

 

[gwap]

 

 
I'm a conservative....

Nobody brands me as a racist

conservative my A**

 

[cl-1b]

werent you in the "all conservatives are racist" discussion we had not too long ago?

 

[ccastro02]

 

 
I'm a conservative....

Nobody brands me as a racist

conservative my A**

[thread="509493"]what makes me not a conservative?[/thread]
[thread="509493"] [/thread]
[thread="509493"]we talking social or fiscal?[/thread]

I can't believe one is required to prove their conservatism.

 

[rolaholic]

Yet some folks wanna play the "party unity" card with Bern to pull out of the race when Hillary didn't give a damn in '08 even when she had no more statistical probable chance

 

[blco02]

I'm a conservative

 

[iamjusayn]

CL is silly putty smh [emoji]128527[/emoji]

 

[cl-1b]

CL is silly putty smh [emoji]128527[/emoji]

that boy smooth.. aint he 

 

[cl-1b]

i feel like Kanye right now.. most hated yet under-rated

 

[gwap]

 
werent you in the "all conservatives are racist" discussion we had not too long ago?

prove that i said that..

otherwise its just more unsubstantiated slander 

sig check

 

[rolaholic]

CL is silly putty smh [emoji]128527[/emoji]

That's so disrespectful to him ,dude actually used to make a lot of good points at times. His delivery was lacking though and was what got him in trouble with folks

 

[deleted]

This new troll is NOTHING like SillyPutty

NOTHING

 

[gwap]

 

CL is silly putty smh [emoji]128527[/emoji]

That's so disrespectful to him

,dude actually used to make a lot of good points at times. His delivery was lacking though and was what got him in trouble with folks

nah.... he was posting info from chain emails...

the thing with cl is that he's able to form an opinion and make it sound logical...

but the logic isn't stable enough to withstand sources and facts that counter it...

then he lost his composure and let his lack of social awareness show through...

once that was in the open, dude was done 

then he started saying he worked with "people like kendrick" and talking about black supremacy...

it's not a coincidence his opinion was opposed...then later he exposed himself

the lack of actual understanding was apparent in the very basis of his financial arguments

 

[RustyShackleford]

Yet some folks wanna play the "party unity" card with Bern to pull out of the race when Hillary didn't give a damn in '08 even when she had no more statistical probable chance

Umm I don't remember it happening like that, people where calling for Clinton to let it go towards like the end of April. And Super Tuesday was weeks earlier that election

Bernie's chances in 2016, are grimmer than Clinton's chances where in 2008

In early March 2008, I believe that race was still close. Before the break in voting happened

 

[cl-1b]

You obviously are misinformed. Im sorry that happened. Let me know if i can help 

 

[cl-1b]

its so easy to tell who is brainwashed by media these days 

 

[deleted]

its so easy to tell who is brainwashed by media these days 

Almost as easy as it is to tell who holds racist views

 

[cl-1b]

Almost as easy as it is to tell who holds racist views

please, shine some light 

 

[illmatic34]

the same way the leftists suppress your people 

Are you Rush Limbaugh by any chance?

 

[gwap]

 
its so easy to tell who is brainwashed by media these days 

 
cl-1b just resposted "facts" from a widely circulating chain email it seems....

 http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/twenty-six-lies-about-hr-3200/

Our inbox has been overrun with messages asking us to weigh in on a mammoth list of claims about the House health care bill. The chain e-mail purports to give "a few highlights" from the first half of the bill, but the list of 48 assertions is filled with falsehoods, exaggerations and misinterpretations. We examined each of the e-mail’s claims, finding 26 of them to be false and 18 to be misleading, only partly true or half true. Only four are accurate. 

 

 

just wanted to fact check your statements and this is the first issue i looked up..

 
We’re not sure how this particular claim came about, but it’s not the first time we’ve heard of problems the Affordable Care Act supposedly creates for those over the age of 75.

In 2012, we wrote about a bogus claim  that under the health care law “no one over 75 will be given major medical procedures unless approved by locally administered Ethics Panels.”

And the same email claiming that primary care physicians must admit patients to hospitals in order for Medicare to cover costs also says that, because of the ACA, “at age 76 when you most need it most, you are not eligible for cancer treatment.” That’s also not true.

That inaccurate claim was based on a misreading of H.R. 3200, an old House health care bill from 2009 that did not become law. David Kithil, a former judge in Burnet County, Texas, made the claim that cancer hospitals “will ration care according to the patient’s age” in a letter he had published in the River Cities Daily Tribune. He cited page 272 of the bill to support his claim about rationed cancer treatment

http://www.factcheck.org/2014/03/a-false-claim-of-a-medicare-change/

you've got to actually read the source material before you post claims in a thread.....

this is not a knock against the "right" or "conservatives"... i just wish you would actually read up on the issues you speak about 

instead of reposting misinformation just because it confirms your political opinion

at least CHECK THE ACCURACY OF WHAT YOU POST 

 

[cl-1b]

 

thought we were talking racism tho? nice try

 

[cl-1b]

Are you Rush Limbaugh by any chance?

Hillary? is that you?

 

[blco02]

 

[deleted]

please, shine some light 

Oh it's definitely not you man

 

[cl-1b]

Oh it's definitely not you man

ill be waiting