elpablo21
Supporter
- 106,059
- 194,617
[QUOTE="Belgium, post: 31246338, member:
NYT: White House says Trump's tan is the result of ‘good genes’
Good lord...
I would KILL for these genes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[QUOTE="Belgium, post: 31246338, member:
NYT: White House says Trump's tan is the result of ‘good genes’
Can confirm the melanin glow on our President elect is indeed natural. Libs just need to appreciate that he is certifiably handsome and would never have to resort to beige Sunday pulpit suits like obummer to offset his personal glow.
And again, the difference between support and worship on full display[QUOTE="Belgium, post: 31246338, member:
NYT: White House says Trump's tan is the result of ‘good genes’
Which is why I hope he tans as often as possibleUsing tanning beds is associated with a significant increase in risk for skin cancer. This is especially true for white people. If this idiot has been regularly using tanning beds and hasn't developed skin cancer he's pretty lucky.
Which is why I hope he tans as often as possible
You can’t make this stuff up. Who lies about using a tanning bed or bronzer?
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...zjLzcW_8dkdSipoWSGXedcNsqgkSVSTPZ5YWhlL23pIpA
NYT: White House says Trump's tan is the result of ‘good genes’
Which is why I hope he tans as often as possible
Trump is starting to raise funds for a general election contest against Hillary Clinton after mostly relying on media attention and his own fortune to prevail in the Republican primary. Trump held his first fundraising event in California last week, and is planning gatherings in Texas, New York, and elsewhere over the coming days.
Clinton, for her part, has been assembling her fundraising infrastructure for more than a year. Just in the past three weeks, the main super-political action committee supporting her spent $5.7 million on advertising attacking Trump.
Several groups of Trump supporters are advancing plans for super-PACs, which can accept donations of as much as $1 million or more, but none has yet emerged as the dominant vehicle.
Trump, who had earlier pegged the cost of a presidential bid at $1 billion, said in the interview that he now sees no reason to raise even half that amount, because he can continue to rely on free media.
Like Trump himself, the real-estate executives he invited to today's meeting aren't staunchly partisan in their political giving. Over the years, Lefrak, Lorber, and Fascitelli, the biggest spenders of the bunch, have each given between $200,000 and $400,000 to federal races, according to Federal Election Commission records. Each gave at least a quarter of his money to Democrats. None of the five had donated to Trump as of April 30, the last day for which campaign contributions have been disclosed. None of the five returned phone calls or emails today.
LeFrak actually donated to a different candidate during the Republican primary—Governor John Kasich of Ohio.
Liked for the selective outrage.Wow smh
it's funny how coherent and articulate Trump suddenly becomes as soon as it's a Democrat who does something racist.
The man seriously has no clue. This isn’t real estate where you can just throw something together and then not pay the bill - moving an army and everything it requires is a huge undertaking. But how could anyone know that? It’s not like it’s been done before. Buhleeve me.