So now your evidence is conjecture?
Add to that, we have to assume the people at Harvard are lying for your theory to work.
Oh, ok
If you had a company and had to fulfill a diversity requirement, would you go out and say "alright, we hired some _____ people. Come on, you're talking in circles now. Another reason why Spinning Rusty is so fitting. And you still have not spoke on why no one will just say why the Native American woman was. It would be the easiest way to end this controversy?
Let me answer conjecture and mental gymnastics with some of my own:
A dude that is a Republican, that worked under Reagan, during an election year, where Warren is up against a weak Republican, repeatedly goes to bat for Warren dismissing the claims, after he is not even in the position he is in anymore.
Yet reality goes against your theory:
The Herald has twice quoted Charles Fried, the head of the Harvard appointing committee that recommended Warren for her position in 1995, saying that the Democratic candidate’s heritage didn’t come up during the course of her hiring. “It simply played no role in the appointments process,” he said. “It was not mentioned and I didn’t mention it to the faculty.”
The Herald later quoted Fried, a former U.S. Solicitor General under President Ronald Reagan, saying, “I can state categorically that the subject of her Native American ancestry never once was mentioned.”
Harvard Law School at the time was embroiled in a fierce debate over lack of faculty diversity. African American law professor Derrick Bell took a two-year leave of absence to protest the program’s hiring policies, students held frequent demonstrations over the same cause and the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination had filed a probable cause finding against the school for denying tenure to Clare Dalton, a liberal instructor.
But several news accounts during that period identified Fried as a conservative faculty member who downplayed the need for change. The Globe described him in April 1992 as an “outspoken defender of the beleaguered faculty appointments committee.”
Nonetheless, Fried showed signs of acquiescing around the time that he joined the faculty appointments committee. The Harvard Law Record asked him in a 1992 Q&A, “How aggressively is the appointments committee pursuing women and minority faculty members?” Fried replied, “Very.”
When asked by the Record whether he believed in affirmative action, Fried replied, “Yes.”
Dude's word pretty much throw your theory out the window. He openly said they are searching for minorities and women, but Warren's claims of being a minority played no part.
But he must be untruthful
-------------And what controversy? Blco made a BS claim and I showed there is no evidence
So Broke Boy Rico, what controversy is there? I'm lost.
Seems you hitch your wagon to the wrong star because you wanted to shade me. Now you're scrambling to save face. Did Harvard report Warren was a Native AMerican, yes, did it have anything to do with her getting the job, no. And I say no because there is literally no evidence that points to that, other than your mental gymnastics
As a white woman, she would still be regarded as a minority, and Harvard was actively seeking qualified women professors too. So you entire reach right now is Harvard doubled dipped on reporting Warren based on her seemingly BS claim?
Is that what you so desperately want me to admit?
