***Official Political Discussion Thread***

It’s pretty pathetic that the US and all other countries for that matter dare not to speak out against China due to fear of economic backlash.

Shows you the power of the dollar, and how weak America really is.
For what it's worth, to some degree the US is speaking out against China in spite of economic backlash. The distinction however is that the US is speaking out against China's currency manipulation, IP theft and corporate espionage, not the Hongkong situation and other human rights violations.


If you want to see the most pathetic display of bowing to China, read this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/world/asia/china-xinjiang-uighurs-belgium.html ( June 18 2018 )
A Muslim Family Sought Help at the Belgian Embassy in Beijing. The Police Dragged Them Out.
The last time Abdulhamid Tursun spoke to his wife, she was huddled in a Beijing hotel room with their four children, frightened after being evicted from the Belgian Embassy in the dead of night. Suddenly, plainclothes police officers burst into the room, cutting off the couple’s video call.

Mr. Tursun says he has not heard from her since.

His wife, Wureyetiguli Abula, 43, had gone to the Belgian Embassy to seek visas so the family — from the Uighur Muslim minority group — could be reunited with Mr. Tursun, 51, in Brussels, where he won asylum in 2017.

But instead of finding protection, Ms. Abula and her children, ages 5 to 17, were dragged away after the Chinese police were allowed to enter the embassy.
Now the case is raising alarms back in Belgium, where lawmakers are asking how it could have happened and where Mr. Tursun’s family has been taken. It illustrates how, two years after China began detaining Uighurs in a vast network of internment camps, the group has limited protections — even from Western democracies — against persecution by the Chinese government.

Even Uighurs who make it to the West have not always been safe. Early last year, Germany mistakenly sent back to China a 22-year-old Uighur asylum seeker, who has not been heard from since.

On Monday, Belgium said it was sending a special envoy to Beijing to clarify the whereabouts of Mr. Tursun’s family. The Belgian government also said its ambassador in Beijing would try to secure passports for Ms. Abula and the children.

In Beijing, a spokesman for the foreign ministry, Lu Kang, said at a regularly scheduled news briefing on Tuesday that he had no knowledge of the case.

China has sent around one million Uighurs to internment camps in Xinjiang, the semiautonomous region in western China where most of them live. The figure is equivalent to about one-tenth of the region’s Uighur population.

The government asserts that the Uighurs represent a terrorism threat to China and the world, an argument that is disputed by many Western nations, who see the internment effort as a systematic abuse of human rights. Some Uighurs who managed to leave the camps have told of being subjected to intense indoctrination under armed guard.

Uighurs outside the camps have seen their cities and homes turned into virtual prisons thanks to surveillance technology and a heavy military presence.
The Belgian Embassy’s handling of the case has come under criticism. Under international law, governments are obliged not to send people to countries where they are at substantial risk of being tortured, said Sarah H. Cleveland, a professor of law at Columbia University. Given that Ms. Abula and her children are Uighur, it was incumbent upon the Belgian Embassy to assess that risk, she said.

Ove Bring, a Swedish expert on human rights law, also said that Belgium appeared to have breached accepted standards of care. “Belgium could be criticized on grounds of international morality, having refused to offer humanitarian protection,” he said.
Since China intensified its crackdown in Xinjiang, some Western European countries have taken precautions to stop Uighurs who seek asylum from being sent back to China. Germany and Sweden said last year that they would refrain from deporting Uighurs.
Ms. Abula arrived in Beijing at the end of May, and on the advice of a nongovernmental organization in Belgium sought visas at the embassy that would allow the family to join Mr. Tursun in Brussels, where he works at an electronics company. He had been granted asylum in Belgium in late 2017 after his brother was arrested and placed in a detention camp.
The family group did not hold Chinese passports. But Mr. Tursun said his wife had been told by CAW, a Belgian group that helps immigrants, that along with the visas she and the children would each be issued a substitute travel document known as a laissez-passer.
At the embassy, Ms. Abula was told that the visas would take longer than she expected. Laissez-passer papers could not be issued because China does not recognize such documents, Matthieu Branders, the spokesman for the Belgian foreign ministry, said in response to written questions.
Scared and frustrated, Ms. Abula told embassy officials that she planned to remain on the grounds after their offices closed, according to Vanessa Frangville, a professor of Chinese studies in Brussels who has worked on the case.

When Ms. Abula settled into the front yard with her children, the staff complained that she was staging a “sit-in,” Mr. Branders said. They offered to drive her to her Beijing hotel in a diplomatic vehicle, he said. But Ms. Abula had already been harassed there by the police and was too afraid to return, Ms. Frangville said.

Soon after midnight on May 29, the police arrived at the embassy and disappeared inside, Mr. Tursun said, recounting what his wife and eldest daughter told him via the messaging app WeChat as events unfolded.
After about an hour, the police drove into the embassy yard, forced Ms. Abula and the children into the car and headed for a nearby police station, Mr. Tursun said.

It is unclear who called the police to the Belgian Embassy, who authorized them to enter, and who asked for Ms. Abula and her children to be removed. Asked on several occasions who let the police onto the embassy grounds, Mr. Branders declined to answer.

By midmorning that day, police officers from Xinjiang had taken charge of the family and transferred them back to the hotel, where they were left alone for a day.
Then on May 31, the plainclothes officers entered the room. “It’s you guys again,” Ms. Abula said, in Mr. Tursun’s recounting. She recognized them from the ordeal at the embassy, he said. Then her cellphone went dead.

Days later, Mr. Tursun learned through a friend that four male and three female police officers had guarded the family as they drove for about 30 hours across China back to their home in Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang.
His wife was now under house arrest, and the electronic equipment Mr. Tursun had left in the house had been confiscated by the police, the friend told him.

Upset that his family’s plans had gone so awry, Mr. Tursun, accompanied by Ms. Frangville, met with Joseph Bockaert, the director of consular affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Brussels.

During the meeting, Mr. Tursun asked the Belgians to press the Chinese about what happened to his family, he said. At one point, Mr. Bockaert replied that Belgium was a small country and could not risk putting too much pressure on China, Ms. Frangville recalled.

“We don’t want to be in conflict with China,” Ms. Frangville quoted Mr. Bockaert as saying. Asked if Mr. Bockaert had made the comment, the spokesman, Mr. Branders, declined to answer.

Belgium has cultivated warmer economic and diplomatic relations with China in the past year. In December, the e-commerce giant Alibaba agreed to invest in logistics infrastructure in the country, a project involving a big lease at the Liège cargo airport, and the first of its kind for the Chinese company in Europe.

The roughly 200 Uighurs who live in Belgium are treated well, Ms. Frangville said, and asylum is granted to those who request it when they arrive.

But she said it was astonishing that the police in Beijing were allowed onto the embassy grounds.

“Someone opened the door,” she said. “The Belgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs won’t say who allowed them in. Why such a mystery?”
 

source.gif
 
For what it's worth, to some degree the US is speaking out against China in spite of economic backlash. The distinction however is that the US is speaking out against China's currency manipulation, IP theft and corporate espionage, not the Hongkong situation and other human rights violations.


If you want to see the most pathetic display of bowing to China, read this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/18/world/asia/china-xinjiang-uighurs-belgium.html ( June 18 2018 )
A Muslim Family Sought Help at the Belgian Embassy in Beijing. The Police Dragged Them Out.
The last time Abdulhamid Tursun spoke to his wife, she was huddled in a Beijing hotel room with their four children, frightened after being evicted from the Belgian Embassy in the dead of night. Suddenly, plainclothes police officers burst into the room, cutting off the couple’s video call.

Mr. Tursun says he has not heard from her since.

His wife, Wureyetiguli Abula, 43, had gone to the Belgian Embassy to seek visas so the family — from the Uighur Muslim minority group — could be reunited with Mr. Tursun, 51, in Brussels, where he won asylum in 2017.

But instead of finding protection, Ms. Abula and her children, ages 5 to 17, were dragged away after the Chinese police were allowed to enter the embassy.
Everyone knows it’s happening, replace Uighurs with Jews and that’s basically Nazi Germany
 

I can't even begin to make sense of this buffoonery. Russia has been alleged to have violated the treaty prior to Trump taking office but you don't just throw out the baby with the bathwater.

Sure, the treaty allows Russia to observe the US, with some restrictions due to said alleged violation(s), but that's just something you have to deal with in exchange for being able to do the same.

The Trump administration only conducted a single surveillance flight in 2018 after an urgent request from Ukraine regarding the naval vessel issue but there were no indications that Russia was refusing to certify flights. The Trump administration blamed an unspecified "impasse."

Below is a letter from former Trump Defense Secretary Mattis, emphasizing the importance of the program and requesting support for upgrading the surveillance equipment on US surveillance planes. Congress effectively blocked that request in the bipartisan 2019 National Defense Authorization Act. While the passing of that law had broad bipartisan support, the successful lobbying against funding the updating of the equipment came from the GOP.
For this reason, it is true that Russia is much better than the US at these surveillance flights, successfully completing nearly all their flights and with far more advanced surveillance equipment on top of that.
That means that compared to Russia, the US is at a strategic disadvantage in this treaty. As Mattis suggested, the solution would be to fund those upgrades, not eliminate US surveillance flights over Russia entirely. After all, Russia would surely reciprocate and restrict all US surveillance flights.
https://www.fischer.senate.gov/publ...arding-the-open-skies-treaty-osd070739-18.pdf
0cfe73228200514acbff778625af5dd5.png
 
Sondland has a scheduled deposition tomorrow.


Based on the publicly available information, Sondland's interactions with Bill Taylor, the top US diplomat in Ukraine seem like the key point of interest.
https://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/textmessages1004.pdf
77ae2487d3f2c667bfa4a81f635239cb.png


As you can see below, the first few texts take place within minutes of eachother.
Bill Taylor then appears to deliberately establish a written record by stating "as I said on the phone" ahead of his view that military aid was being withheld to help Trump's political campaign.
Despite answering the previous texts within minutes, Sondland takes several hours to respond. When he does respond, it reads like a dictated talking point. Presumably he alerted the WH about Bill Taylor's incriminating text and asked for guidance on how to respond. At this point he also urges Taylor to "stop the back and forth by text."
46de4d958e9cbd754b6f3dc6447704a5.png
 
Giuliani's co-conspirators Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman notify Congress that they will not show up for a deposition or provide documents.


https://apnews.com/edd54b7c56f04d158f7addb69d157cc0
AP’s key findings about Ukraine gas deal Trump allies sought
e9d900b4c4985c66f1d136e5e7cceff8.png


3cf079e0c74f391bf5a2e045122105c7.png


09649b070bcab15374ec8036c9380529.png


John Dowd, the former Trump attorney now representing Parnas and Fruman, contradicts Giuliani's claim in the above excerpt about the deal.
83d81e6dc19f4a79541f957e3c4de334.png


9aeaabcf7951e02850d414abeca78516.png
 
Did trump piss off some MIC masters with this move in order to curry favor for his private business dealings. Guess this is what it takes for republican politicians to criticize him.
 
I can't wait to hear how they flip it to being in full agreement with the Pres. because he was right all along tomorrow.
The president, OUR president, in his great, unmatched, infinite and incredible wisdom, is always right. Always right, very right, very far right and as right as you can get. Dont cross our President or he will OBLITERATE you as he does all His enemies. #LockHerUp #BuildThatWall and #LetErdoganEat
 

Now watch the Dems still refuse to use their inherent contempt powers and opt instead to twiddle their thumbs hoping that these good people will have a change of heart and stop stonewalling at some point.


Trump confirms the order came from him, not just the State Dept:
 
and they gonna get nothing done yet again. They should throw in a failure to comply to subpeonas will result in a warrant for arrest
 
In any case, Dems should schedule a deposition for Ambassador Bill Taylor. The released text messages show he clearly believed there was an explicit quid pro quo on 2 fronts. He referred to a Trump-Zelensky meeting being conditioned on Ukraine's release of a drafted statement (with help from Giuliani) explicitly stating they would investigate Burisma and the 2016 election. Giuliani specifically requested the addition of Burisma to the statement, which was the company where Hunter Biden used to be a boardmember. Giuliani & co use Burisma as a euphemism for Hunter Biden.
Addtionally, Taylor explicitly referred to withholding military aid to Ukraine in order to help Trump's re-election campaign.
 
Back
Top Bottom