***Official Political Discussion Thread***

ninjahood ninjahood rico x hood rico x hood

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/clinton-leads-trump-breitbart-poll

Aiming to address a recent slew of “mainstream media” polls showing Hillary Clinton holding a decisive lead over of Donald Trump, Breitbart News conducted its own survey. But the conservative news site came up with similar results.

In a poll out Sunday from Breitbart and Gravis Marketing, Clinton led a four-way contest with 42 percent of the vote to Trump’s 37 percent. Libertarian Gary Johnson earned 9 percent of the vote, while the Green Party’s Jill Stein received 3 percent.
 
Meanwhile, Rico's boy, Rubio is still backing Trump, despite calling him a con man.
In the heat of the Republican presidential primary, Marco Rubio called Donald Trump a “con man.” And he doesn’t take it back.

“I’ve stood by everything I ever said in my campaign,” Rubio told the Miami Herald editorial board Monday.

But Rubio still supports Trump for president. In fact, Rubio insists, Trump is partly why he reversed himself and chose to run for the U.S. Senate again.

“We’re in a different place now. Now we have a binary choice — not a choice between 15 people or 12 people. There are two people in the world that are going to be the next president, either Donald or Hillary” Clinton, he said. “In our republic, while the presidency is powerful, there is a balance of power in this country, and a significant amount of it resides in the United States Senate. It’s one of the reasons why I seek to run again.”
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/election/marco-rubio/article95752532.html
 


1000
 
With all the voter IDs laws going around in red states (many that that been found discriminatory, and violates the constitution), it is the liberals that don't care about the process :rolleyes


What a load of ********
*Waits for Ninja to come in and start spewing his "how can voter ID laws be discriminatory? da identity politics at work again" bs

Nah he been spewing "But the court said the intention weren't for them to be disciplinary, la liberals using identity politics to make this political"

Completely ignoring that months ago, he was right there with Blco saying the laws weren't discriminatory at all


With all the voter IDs laws going around in red states (many that that been found discriminatory, and violates the constitution), it is the liberals that don't care about the process :rolleyes


What a load of ********
*Waits for Ninja to come in and start spewing his "how can voter ID laws be discriminatory? da identity politics at work again" bs

u got served when da judge concluded da laws weren't enacted with a intent on being discriminatory (Texas ruling)

Called it. im too lazy to even think of new reason why i keep blaming others

judge found no intent on discriminatory behavior...should be case closed from here. but with ur SJW tendencies u cant help yourself :{ :lol
 
Picking and choosing I see. Obama completely flip flopped on Hillary being qualified to be President.

And what does it say about Hillany that she'd even solicit from him? Trump has stated many time that it was his business to be on good terms with everyone. His donations weren't based on ideology.
 
a campaign ad more than eight years ago.

:lol

How desperate is Trump these days? Looking up old ads to try to make a point... pathetic! Too bad for Trump all those past Obama ads, rivalry/competition to be used against Clinton became dead and forgotten once they embraced and he endorsed her.
700
 
In regards to da biased media, I've always found it odd to see national news stations blatantly inject personal opinions and bias into the reporting of news. Is that common place in all of these mainstream stations?

In contrast, we only have 2 national news stations on tv here in the northern part of Belgium but both pride themselves on being as neutral as possible. There is always gonna be some bias in what they choose to report of course (one leans left, the other right) but the station and their news anchors never comment on what they're reporting, neither do the reporters. In the case of da Donald, a segment about him can be summed up as "Donald trump makes statement that caused controversy" followed by a video of whatever he said and that's that, no opinions about the content. 

On the other hand, Fox News for example feels more like I'm watching propaganda instead of real reporting.

Do y'all have any laws regarding national news bias? Our newspapers are heavily biased, arguably more than those in the US, but they are recognized as such and are put in a different category than our national news. The idea here is that national news broadcasts should ideally provide completely neutral reporting, whereas newspapers are free to do whatever they want.
 
Last edited:
In regards to da biased media, I've always found it odd to see national news stations blatantly inject personal opinions and bias into the reporting of news. Is that common place in all of these mainstream stations?
In contrast, we only have 2 national news stations on tv here in the northern part of Belgium but both pride themselves on being as neutral as possible. There is always gonna be some bias in what they choose to report of course (one leans left, the other right) but the station and their news anchors never comment on what they're reporting, neither do the reporters. In the case of da Donald, a segment about him can be summed up as "Donald trump makes statement that caused controversy" followed by a video of whatever he said and that's that, no opinions about the content. 
On the other hand, Fox News for example feels more like I'm watching propaganda instead of real reporting.
Do y'all have any laws regarding national news bias?

Unfortunately, yes. It's the only reason I stick to NPR/WTTW (public broadcaster) whenever I listen to the radio or watch TV to stay informed on current events (in addition, both broadcast the BBC news hour, which I like because i get to see how the US is portrayed abroad) . Unsurprisingly, the GOP led the charge to (and succeeded in) defunding the network of stations, which means that they've had to rely on more fundraising drives and private donations to operate.

There is an awesome book I'd recommend to understand the current abysmal state of US journalism. It will not cover the last decade of US journalism but it's a pretty good overview of how we got to the point where news outlets have come to rely on third hand accounts instead of going straight to the source. The title is "Bad News".
 
Picking and choosing I see. Obama completely flip flopped on Hillary being qualified to be President.

And what does it say about Hillany that she'd even solicit from him? Trump has stated many time that it was his business to be on good terms with everyone. His donations weren't based on ideology.
I didn't pick and choose anything.....  all I did was point out that IN THE SAME ARTICLE you used to show how Obama said Hillary is full of **** also mentions the fact that Trump said "she'd make a great president" 

LOL... listen to yourself fam..... you criticizing and supporting hypocrisy at the same damn time 

never change NT 
 
good news, everyone! we're going to defeat Isis!

Trump has finally let us in on his secret plan. I'm going to whisper it in case the terrorists are listening. *in case the Islamic terrorists are listening. (adding "Islamic" makes it more effective, like adding a roofie to alcohol).

The secret? Are you all ready?

Vetting!

Yes, and not just any vetting. Not even just extreme vetting.

No, this is even better. This is extreme, extreme vetting!!!

giphy.gif


I finally feel safe walking the streets of America again! Yay for Trump.

(that's ninja, Rick, and blco in the picture.)
 
Last edited:
I didn't pick and choose anything.....  all I did was point out that IN THE SAME ARTICLE you used to show how Obama said Hillary is full of **** also mentions the fact that Trump said "she'd make a great president" 

LOL... listen to yourself fam..... you criticizing and supporting hypocrisy at the same damn time 

never change NT 

In 08 Obama told us exactly what he thought of Hillary as far as a presidential candidate. Now he's playing politics with the country by supporting her. Trump was simply putting himself in the best position to conduct his business. That's why he donated to BOTH sides. Big difference.
 
if anyone is interested in a full hour of intellectual dishonesty, here is Drumpf's speech:

trump saying he will shut down the intended. bye bye net neutrality.
 
Last edited:
I didn't pick and choose anything.....  all I did was point out that IN THE SAME ARTICLE you used to show how Obama said Hillary is full of **** also mentions the fact that Trump said "she'd make a great president" 

LOL... listen to yourself fam..... you criticizing and supporting hypocrisy at the same damn time 

never change NT 

In 08 Obama told us exactly what he thought of Hillary as far as a presidential candidate. Now he's playing politics with the country by supporting her. Trump was simply putting himself in the best position to conduct his business. That's why he donated to BOTH sides. Big difference.
you don't think maybe he said that because she was his opponent in the election? i mean it's a bit of a stretch, i know, but wanted to float it out there.
 
Back
Top Bottom