- 29,014
- 4,130
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea what the foams pic is about at all but I knew his wife died of cancer and players were claiming they were going to win the game for her but I don't care. To me that's just bs to add a story to the game.Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
He couldn't have known. I mean, did you know ATGDKLJ3433KLJMLK? I trust that people aren't really that damn ignorant. He didn't know.....I hope.Originally Posted by MJGREATXII
Originally Posted by Brandon3000
You acting like a punk @%$ @@#$@. Really?
I mean the owner lost HIS WIFE, and you going post about some damn foams? I been on this site forever, but it seems like for the last year there have been some really messed up people on here.
I'll do you one better, have fun being a sorry @%$ cavs and browns fan that will NEVER WIN a damn thing.
Well, they were probably listening to "Practice" on a loop before that, so it was already low.Originally Posted by Deuce King
They let a super model put them in check like that......LOL. Their manhood has to be at an all-time low.
Originally Posted by Mr Marcus
she was getting harassed and she replied to her assistant that brady can't throw and catch passes......i mean thats his wife for christ sakes.....you giants fans are immature and you can keep those jersey cows.....
Salt.Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by LosALMIGHTY
I fail to see how the Hicks fumble and Bradshaw non-fumble are the same play. One was negated by a penalty and the other was a "forward progress stopped" play. No penalty = fumble and pats ball.
Wow. Talk about missing the point.
The penalty has NOTHING to do with what I am talking about. Its how the play was allowed to play out. The reason you fail to see how they were the same play is because you have homer goggles on. They were the exact same play. The only difference is the play in the Superbowl was not incorrectly whistled dead. Nicks' progress was barely stopped, and the refs let it play out like its regularly done in the NFL. Bradshaw's progress was barely stopped and the refs blew it dead far earlier than they should have.
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
I thought Birdmans money was on the Giants?
Originally Posted by LosALMIGHTY
Salt.Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by LosALMIGHTY
I fail to see how the Hicks fumble and Bradshaw non-fumble are the same play. One was negated by a penalty and the other was a "forward progress stopped" play. No penalty = fumble and pats ball.
Wow. Talk about missing the point.
The penalty has NOTHING to do with what I am talking about. Its how the play was allowed to play out. The reason you fail to see how they were the same play is because you have homer goggles on. They were the exact same play. The only difference is the play in the Superbowl was not incorrectly whistled dead. Nicks' progress was barely stopped, and the refs let it play out like its regularly done in the NFL. Bradshaw's progress was barely stopped and the refs blew it dead far earlier than they should have.
But seriously I'll have to look at the Nicks play again and then get back to you. I can't remember if Nicks had time to run/start his forward progress or not. Bradshaw ran for a couple of yards than was starting to be pulled down from behind.
When I get home from work tonight, I'll watch the Giants win the Super Bowl again and get back to you.
Originally Posted by dland24
Originally Posted by LosALMIGHTY
Salt.Originally Posted by dland24
Wow. Talk about missing the point.
The penalty has NOTHING to do with what I am talking about. Its how the play was allowed to play out. The reason you fail to see how they were the same play is because you have homer goggles on. They were the exact same play. The only difference is the play in the Superbowl was not incorrectly whistled dead. Nicks' progress was barely stopped, and the refs let it play out like its regularly done in the NFL. Bradshaw's progress was barely stopped and the refs blew it dead far earlier than they should have.
But seriously I'll have to look at the Nicks play again and then get back to you. I can't remember if Nicks had time to run/start his forward progress or not. Bradshaw ran for a couple of yards than was starting to be pulled down from behind.
When I get home from work tonight, I'll watch the Giants win the Super Bowl again and get back to you.
LOL at "Salt." I already specifically stated that I was bitter, so I dont know how you saying salt proves anything.
You should save yourself the time. It was the EXACT same. Yes, you are right. Bradshaw was "starting toe be pulled down." What if he broke it? I bet you would be b****ing as much as I am. The whistle was too early, and was in fact one of the reasons the Giants beat the Niners. Very disappointing for the 49ers, and makes it even worse to see the play called properly in the Superbowl.
Hadn't seen this last season. Thanks for spoiling it...Originally Posted by gambit215
First Deb finds out your secret now this......Originally Posted by WitnessMyCalm21
LOOK AT HIS FACE! LOOK AT IT!
Been a real bad year for Dexter Morgan thus far.................
The reason they aren't the same is cuz Nicks forward progression wasn't stopped and Bradshaw's forward progression was stopped. If you can't see that, sucks for you. Go ahead and carry that "blown" call with you the rest of your life.Originally Posted by dland24
Wow. Talk about missing the point.Originally Posted by LosALMIGHTY
I fail to see how the Hicks fumble and Bradshaw non-fumble are the same play. One was negated by a penalty and the other was a "forward progress stopped" play. No penalty = fumble and pats ball.
The penalty has NOTHING to do with what I am talking about. Its how the play was allowed to play out. The reason you fail to see how they were the same play is because you have homer goggles on. They were the exact same play. The only difference is the play in the Superbowl was not incorrectly whistled dead. Nicks' progress was barely stopped, and the refs let it play out like its regularly done in the NFL. Bradshaw's progress was barely stopped and the refs blew it dead far earlier than they should have.
It's the salt from their tears man.Originally Posted by HarlemToTheBronx
So much salt in here.
Originally Posted by venom lyrix
Originally Posted by Mr Marcus
she was getting harassed and she replied to her assistant that brady can't throw and catch passes......i mean thats his wife for christ sakes.....you giants fans are immature and you can keep those jersey cows.....
SALTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SHUT YOUR MOUTH GO CRY IN A CORNER SOMEWHERE VIC
I loved it when Cris Carter %$!!$*# all over Tiki last night after the game about all the disrespectful things he said about EliOriginally Posted by Scott Frost
One positive I can take from the game is Tiki Barber didnt win, again.
Originally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
I loved it when Cris Carter %$!!$*# all over Tiki last night after the game about all the disrespectful things he said about EliOriginally Posted by Scott Frost
One positive I can take from the game is Tiki Barber didnt win, again.
I haven't seen vids on it. You might be able to catch the rerun on ESPN. It's that lineup team of Stuart Scott, Keyshawn, Carter, and that other white guy who's name I forget.Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN
Is there a link to this? I need to see itOriginally Posted by ATGD7154xBBxMZ
I loved it when Cris Carter %$!!$*# all over Tiki last night after the game about all the disrespectful things he said about EliOriginally Posted by Scott Frost
One positive I can take from the game is Tiki Barber didnt win, again.