- 1,594
- 5,839
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
Does anyone know when the Moleskin notebooks will be released this season? It's the only must-cop for me since those are my go-to work notebooks
Official Supreme Thread FW24 Week 3
millzszn93
formerly nikeairmillz93
- 8,233
- 8,173
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2012
idk how and why ppl are buying these dirty forces
- 898
- 2,142
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2022
wanted to buy these mid ones. guess ill pass.
I remember when af1 were hot in the late 90s/early 2000s. lower retail and better quality. Even the jordan retros had good quality at their price at that time.
Now these ones have cheaper quality and higher msrp.
I remember when af1 were hot in the late 90s/early 2000s. lower retail and better quality. Even the jordan retros had good quality at their price at that time.
Now these ones have cheaper quality and higher msrp.
- 2,481
- 8,022
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
Quarter century ago. You gotta adjust those prices for inflation
Did this the other day when reminiscing about when thinking about how Skittles used to cost 0.59 cents when I was a kid. Then I remembered people was making $3.50 an hour in the 90s
- 898
- 2,142
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2022
yeah but more or less Skittles taste the same in terms of quality.Quarter century ago. You gotta adjust those prices for inflation
Did this the other day when reminiscing about when thinking about how Skittles used to cost 0.59 cents when I was a kid. Then I remembered people was making $3.50 an hour in the 90s
At least the skittles quality doesn’t seem as different as the difference in quality is between the 90s/2000s af1 and todays af1. I mean not that theres really a comparison between taste and material.
The inflation is true though. But for the wages and prices, at least the quality was worth buying back then.
I took a look at the checkout for these mids, $156.78. I’d bet the quality is thin, flimsy, and hollow or light feeling. Leather probably stiff too. Thats why I was thinking about the early days and when it was worth that.
- 25,929
- 19,094
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2003
Did anyone cop? I saw that these were sold out... I couldn't pull the trigger... the white pair is nice just don't see myself rocking them anytime soon lol
- 7,501
- 8,973
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
I feel like this is more of an indictment on Nike than anything related to Supreme. When it comes to quality materials for the price point I’ve rarely been let down by Supreme’s hoodies or pants. Seems like quite a bit of evidence out there the cost on those Supreme products is higher than the average streetwear brand.
- 1,940
- 4,509
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2002
"Sold Out". Don't fall for that Supreme okie doke. They'll magically appear sooner or later with an FSR.
Last edited:
- 5,199
- 7,762
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2013
these def have to be planned less made than the lows over the years
- 39,030
- 40,178
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
on nike
- 898
- 2,142
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2022
These ‘24 af1 mid were $134. And just 2 years ago those BAMN sb dunk highs were $128. The Rammellzee sb dunk lows were $138, hi were $148. Af1 prices should stay within the price range of its worth, and imo thats under $100.
- 2,541
- 5,155
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2019
AF1 material quality, shape, and pricing are so incredibly inconsistent. It's infuriating for someone who genuinely likes the silhouette. Then again, the COTM AF1 releases were some of the best shape and materials on an AF1 in a LONG time, were basically the same price as the garbage, and they all sat and went on HEAVY clearance. Most of the people who buy sneakers just don't care about material quality and shape, unfortunately.
- 7,501
- 8,973
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Well you also have to remember that if you’re under 30 you probably don’t have a frame of reference on quality. Which is why I feel the COTMs were aimed at an older AF1 consumer, not a kid in their 20’s. Nike gives Supreme a price point, Supreme agrees, this is the quality Nike delivers to them at that price point.
- 638
- 590
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2014
Both S logo jerseys came in. Size L camo is WAY too big on me. If anyone wants for $130 shipped dm me
Size M way better fit.
Size M way better fit.
bankstevens
formerly juice8732
- 2,194
- 2,195
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2007
Tan Raindrop Camp came in. Got a green box logo sticker and camps still made in USA 
- 16,936
- 22,861
- Joined
- May 2, 2010
How big no karamo
- 38,804
- 77,284
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
- 25,274
- 53,552
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2005
JPS
formerly instagram
- 30,730
- 35,999
- Joined
- May 4, 2015
If the width is 24 inches I’ll take it. Is it tight or loose?
- 1,637
- 3,709
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2017
That vanson is copped!! Another one to add to the collection!!
- 1,637
- 3,709
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2017
Damn, I'm dreading these posts. I'm normally a medium but this is scaring tf out of me. Big boys squeezing into mediums?!!
- 15,688
- 12,039
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2006
Men shouldn't ‘squeeze’ into anything but one thing only lol
- 2,541
- 5,155
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2019
I wear an XL in Supreme t-shirts and my L jersey fits. Seems like the provided measurements were pretty spot on. They're very lightweight though.
- 7,710
- 7,775
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
Forgot I had these in the back of my closet.
- 1,637
- 3,709
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2017
The tongue looks crazy on those.
