- May 14, 2013
- 14,861
- 20,635
To be clear, I’m only talking about the TS T-Rex/Jumpman Jack line. Obviously, Nike/JB have the infrastructure to make retros in huge GR releases lol
I also think you are underrating how many people don’t want to rock fusions. The only way to make a fusion model enticing is to build up hype and the way they are doing that is by making them in such little quantity that resell is insane. Eventually, people get used to seeing the model and it is hyped enough that they will cave and buy the takedown or GR version without TS “JACK” branding, etc. I guarantee you this is the long term strategy because fusions can’t rely on the rich MJ-led and sneaker history like retros can (to include TS retros). Until then, nobody is buying this Jordan Brand shoe for MSRP without Travis’ name and branding attached to it, regardless of how limited it is.
These jumpman jacks aren’t releasing in a vacuum though. They’re the first signature shoe In a collaboration that will be a decade old in 2027. I’m questioning the point of the collaboration in totality if the goal isn’t to flush out this line more and increase supply? I don’t know whether or not the jumpman jacks would do well at 300k stock instead of 30k stock, but I don’t think that matters. Nike continually makes shoes that routinely go on discount and don’t have nearly the demand even this jumpman Jack has at $200 retail/$500 resell as part of their retail strategy. What’s the excuse to keeping the entire line as limited as they have? They either want to sell more shoes with Travis’ name on them or they don’t and it’s just marketing for the brand as whole. If its the latter than that’s trash on Nikes part.
People are rarely one and done when it comes to new stuff but you gotta actually try new stuff get attached to it. If these trainers are supposed to be a a major part of the collab moving forward, Nike is doing the line a disservice by keeping these out of people’s hands.