- 29,630
- 1,863
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
no respect
that scene was awesome
what did he specifically change from the script
that scene was awesome
what did he specifically change from the script
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Basically, they don't have the subtle humanizing characteristics that most Tarantino characters have (Marcellus Wallace's wife's corny little joke, Mr. Pink's Madonna story, etc.).Originally Posted by koolbarbone
In a nutshell:
If it was a Tarantino film then audiences would have really found Mickey and Mallory cool. Instead, they are portrayed as deranged offshoots of the 90s media culture.
Natural Born Killers was based upon a screenplay written by Quentin Tarantino, in which a married couple suddenly decides to go on a killing spree. Tarantino had sold an option for his script to producers Jane Hamsher and Don Murphy for $10,000 after he had tried, and failed, to direct it himself for $500,000.[sup][3][/sup] Hamsher and Murphy subsequently sold the screenplay to Warner Bros. Around the same time, Oliver Stone was made aware of the script. He was keen to find something more straightforward than his previous production, Heaven & Earth; a difficult shoot which had left him exhausted, and he felt that Natural Born Killers could be what he was looking for.[sup][4][/sup]
Director Oliver Stone, associate producer Richard Rutowski, and writer David Veloz rewrote the script, keeping much of the dialogue but changing the focus of the film from journalist Wayne Gale (Robert Downey, Jr.) to Mickey and Mallory. Indeed, the script was changed so much that as per WGA rules, Tarantino was credited for the film's story only. In a 1993 interview, Tarantino stated that he no longer held any animosity towards Stone, and that he wished the film well;
"It's not going to be my movie, it's going to be Oliver Stone's, and God bless him. I hope he does a good job with it. If I wasn't emotionally attached to it, I'm sure I would find it very interesting. If you like my stuff, you might not like this movie. But if you like his stuff, you're probably going to love it. It might be the best thing he's ever done, but not because of anything to do with me. [...] I actually can't wait to see it, to tell you the truth."[sup][5][/sup]
Initially, when producers Jane Hamsher and Don Murphy had first brought the script to Stone's attention, he had seen it as an action movie; "something Arnold Schwarzenegger would be proud of."[sup][6][/sup] As the project developed however, incidents such as the O.J. Simpson case, the Menendez brothers case, the Tonya Harding/Nancy Kerrigan incident, the Rodney King incident and the Federal assault of the Branch Davidian sect all took place. Stone came to feel that the media was heavily involved in the outcome of all of these cases, and that the media had become an all-pervasive entity which marketed violence and suffering for the good of ratings. As such, he changed the tone of the movie from one of simple action to a satirical critique of the media in general.[sup][4][/sup]
The whole satirical critique would've been so much better if Robert Downey Jr. played more of a role throughout the film, than just the last act.
John Travolta agrees to play John Gotti - http://bit.ly/h6hVHk
http://bit.ly/h6hVHk
Guess karma really does exist.
And Dub, I meant the whole interview thing with Woody and Robert Downey Jr. The escape was pretty badass, I'll give them that.
Edit: Wait, I think you're talking about the Dangerfield scene, took me a minute to get the "no respect"
Speaking of Wood and Downey, anybody watch A Scanner Darkly? Just watched it before and that is one trippy #!+ movie.
Basically, they don't have the subtle humanizing characteristics that most Tarantino characters have (Marcellus Wallace's wife's corny little joke, Mr. Pink's Madonna story, etc.).Originally Posted by koolbarbone
In a nutshell:
If it was a Tarantino film then audiences would have really found Mickey and Mallory cool. Instead, they are portrayed as deranged offshoots of the 90s media culture.
Natural Born Killers was based upon a screenplay written by Quentin Tarantino, in which a married couple suddenly decides to go on a killing spree. Tarantino had sold an option for his script to producers Jane Hamsher and Don Murphy for $10,000 after he had tried, and failed, to direct it himself for $500,000.[sup][3][/sup] Hamsher and Murphy subsequently sold the screenplay to Warner Bros. Around the same time, Oliver Stone was made aware of the script. He was keen to find something more straightforward than his previous production, Heaven & Earth; a difficult shoot which had left him exhausted, and he felt that Natural Born Killers could be what he was looking for.[sup][4][/sup]
Director Oliver Stone, associate producer Richard Rutowski, and writer David Veloz rewrote the script, keeping much of the dialogue but changing the focus of the film from journalist Wayne Gale (Robert Downey, Jr.) to Mickey and Mallory. Indeed, the script was changed so much that as per WGA rules, Tarantino was credited for the film's story only. In a 1993 interview, Tarantino stated that he no longer held any animosity towards Stone, and that he wished the film well;
"It's not going to be my movie, it's going to be Oliver Stone's, and God bless him. I hope he does a good job with it. If I wasn't emotionally attached to it, I'm sure I would find it very interesting. If you like my stuff, you might not like this movie. But if you like his stuff, you're probably going to love it. It might be the best thing he's ever done, but not because of anything to do with me. [...] I actually can't wait to see it, to tell you the truth."[sup][5][/sup]
Initially, when producers Jane Hamsher and Don Murphy had first brought the script to Stone's attention, he had seen it as an action movie; "something Arnold Schwarzenegger would be proud of."[sup][6][/sup] As the project developed however, incidents such as the O.J. Simpson case, the Menendez brothers case, the Tonya Harding/Nancy Kerrigan incident, the Rodney King incident and the Federal assault of the Branch Davidian sect all took place. Stone came to feel that the media was heavily involved in the outcome of all of these cases, and that the media had become an all-pervasive entity which marketed violence and suffering for the good of ratings. As such, he changed the tone of the movie from one of simple action to a satirical critique of the media in general.[sup][4][/sup]
The whole satirical critique would've been so much better if Robert Downey Jr. played more of a role throughout the film, than just the last act.
John Travolta agrees to play John Gotti - http://bit.ly/h6hVHk
http://bit.ly/h6hVHk
Guess karma really does exist.
And Dub, I meant the whole interview thing with Woody and Robert Downey Jr. The escape was pretty badass, I'll give them that.
Edit: Wait, I think you're talking about the Dangerfield scene, took me a minute to get the "no respect"
Speaking of Wood and Downey, anybody watch A Scanner Darkly? Just watched it before and that is one trippy #!+ movie.
Hoop Dreams is a great 90's film period. I honestly thought it would slip low enough in the draft for me to steal it.Originally Posted by Big J 33
No love for Hoop Dreams
Hoop Dreams is a great 90's film period. I honestly thought it would slip low enough in the draft for me to steal it.Originally Posted by Big J 33
No love for Hoop Dreams