geegee wrote:
Originally Posted by
Seymore CAKE
geegee wrote:
Originally Posted by
Seymore CAKE
^he needs to be focused on wars, health care, the country's financial collapse, alternative energy, etc. Shouldn't even have commented about the event in any way. we really don't need the leader of the so-called "free world" commenting about Kanye's behavior on MTV. Last time i checked there was a crazy body count in Iraq and Afghanistan. get your priorities straight Barack.
Are you serious? You think that he shouldn't answer any question that asked to him if its not related to public policy? Not to mention it was during downtime off the record while they were waiting for the set up to finish so they could start the interview. You don't think he deserves to be a human being G? Were you saying that about Bush, who's the reason that body count is as high as it is in the first place, posted up in Beijing for the Olympics? Are You Serious?
yes i am serious. i don't think he should be commenting on the behavior of an artist at a music awards show. that doesn't mean he should only comment on public policy issues but i don't think trivial award shows should be commented on by the president. that's my opinion. if you don't agree, that's okay with me. I know people on NT don't usually understand that everyone does not share the same opinion. Of course he deserves to be a human being, he watches sports and does plenty of other "normal" activities. I just don't think it was appropriate or professional to comment on Kanye's foolish antics on a award show. It doesn't matter if it was off the recorded because it was said and still reported. So it wasn't on the official record but it still made headlines. Yes I was saying a lot worse about Bush and yea he is the reason for the body count but Barack still continues many of Bush's policies.
I'm okay with you disagreeing with me and yea i am serious so make sure you know what your talking about before responding to my posts. Is that enough clarity? seriously
What the hell are you talking about? I responded to your post which implied that he should be some holier than thou type being and should be above discussing something that had his country in an uproar for the past 2days.
I don't care about us disagreeing, I simply asked questions I really wanted answers to.
^you left a snarky comment quoting my post because you disagree. so why wouldn't i address the fact that i'm okay with that? So you think Kanye put the entire country in an uproar.speak for yourself. seriously? I already answered your question but you keep writing stupidness that I have to address.I said I don't think it was appropriate or professional for the president to comment on Kanye's foolish antics on a award show, especially given the numerous major issues currently facing the nation. you have no points whatsoever and you really need to work on your interpretation of words because you just don't seem to get it.
Again... What The *$+% Are You Talking About? I didn't leave you a snarky comment,
I ASKED YOU A SERIES OF QUESTIONS THAT I WANTEDANSWERED. You obliged then said "Make Sure I Know What I'm Talking About Before Responding To Your Post" which made absolutely nosense at all since my response was a series of questions. That coupled with your latest attempt to rebuttle my response to that post with more rambling has mequestioning your comprehension abilities. If you had actually read what you just responded to right now then you would know this, I'll even bold it andput it in larger font for you.
Oh and last time I checked Kanye's antics were being discussed nationwide with the popular opinion amongst the population upset along with inflating someracial tension for 2 days, yet it wasn't an uproar?
