And yet still not comparable.
In your opinion*
So we're just stating the obvious now like it's profound?
I don't like Broner at all but I don't see either being "irrelevant" any time soon. Sad but true. Garcia not even close either.
Garcia/Paulie just put up the highest Boxing ratings on ESPN in close to 20 years.
Obviously Paulie was a part of that. But it takes two. Thurman couldn't do something like that on his own.
Not a fan of some of Garcia's recent fights. Even as a fan, I thought Herrera beat him and Peterson fight was tough and could, probably should, have gone the other way.
But when he fought great fighters, he fought well. At least well enough to make them competitive. Something I haven't seen Broner do in a while.
Herrera is a tough out. Peterson is no joke. But he didn't get washed the way Broner did vs. Maidana and Porter.
And he does still have W's over Khan, Matthysse, under his belt.
Even looking at the way they fight....not at all similar. Danny is at least active.
Hence, not at all comparable.