- 9,253
- 3,007
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2005
Logical conclusion for you. Many have already explained why that parallel can't be drawn. But you keep wanting to push it because that's the only counter you have. You're grasping at straws and it's showing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
but they arent currently instilling and enforcing those ways...Thats like blaming me for my dad selling drugs and then telling me oh if i dont try to in some revisionist history type of way right his wrongs by becoming a narc or drug counselor or something i need to leave the country...Nothing i can do to change the past, but there is something i could do to affect the present and future.I'm not blaming all whites, just Americans who could have read up on the history and bounced. (Btw, I, personally, don't blame all American whites for those things, I, a reasonable man, understand it was a few who did this, it was also part of the times, so not everyone who is a practicing white American is to blame, it's just the logical conclusion of everyone else's argument.)
Well I think he meant the white ppl of that time era (and whoever supports it today) so I think it'd be fine to blame the majority of white ppl in America and Europe for that.blame all white folks for what exactly?First of all, the Catholic Church qualifies, under most generally accepted political science definitions, as a State and a Nation, it's not a country but it does own one, so can we quit the straw man.
The point being, if you can prejudge and blame all Catholics I should be able to prejudge and blame all white folks.
![]()
Well if by a few you mean hundreds of thousands of white ppl in a position of power and all those who let it happen without speaking up (you know the all adage about letting evil prosper and good men doing nothing) over the course of 5 centuries compared to the countless millions of Africans enslaved over that same time then yeah sure it's a few white ppl and I'm being reasonable.I'm not blaming all whites, just Americans who could have read up on the history and bounced. (Btw, I, personally, don't blame all American whites for those things, I, a reasonable man, understand it was a few who did this, it was also part of the times, so not everyone who is a practicing white American is to blame, it's just the logical conclusion of everyone else's argument.)
id agree with that but those ppl no longer exist... and they arent still here associating themselves with slavery and promoting slavery... now if there ancestors of that era are here and now and still believe and associate themselves with that mindset then id understand his point.Well I think he meant the white ppl of that time era (and whoever supports it today) so I think it'd be fine to blame the majority of white ppl in America and Europe for that.
I don't think anybody is saying blame all white ppl now for the crimes of their ancestors.
Well if by a few you mean hundreds of thousands of white ppl in a position of power and all those who let it happen without speaking up (you know the all adage about letting evil prosper and good men doing nothing) over the course of 5 centuries compared to the countless millions of Africans enslaved over that same time then yeah sure it's a few white ppl and I'm being reasonable.
People can't choose where they are born but they can choose what organizations they subscribe to. Children are not held accountable if they are born catholic, they essentially have no choice. But once they become the age to choose and they decide to remain catholic, then they have made a conscious decision to continue endorsing the rape of little boys across the world.
Well yeah obviously they're long dead but I don't think the point was to look for ppl to blame who are still living.id agree with that but those ppl no longer exist... and they arent still here associating themselves with slavery and promoting slavery... now if there ancestors of that era are here and now and still believe and associate themselves with that mindset then id understand his point.Well I think he meant the white ppl of that time era (and whoever supports it today) so I think it'd be fine to blame the majority of white ppl in America and Europe for that.
I don't think anybody is saying blame all white ppl now for the crimes of their ancestors.
Well if by a few you mean hundreds of thousands of white ppl in a position of power and all those who let it happen without speaking up (you know the all adage about letting evil prosper and good men doing nothing) over the course of 5 centuries compared to the countless millions of Africans enslaved over that same time then yeah sure it's a few white ppl and I'm being reasonable.
But those same religious beliefs principles bylaws rules, gods etc.. still exist and while the originators arent here. it isnt the same as the example of the whites because one their views and actions are still being conducted... and there are ppl still apart of it and promoting and associating themselves with it aka current believers
One does not simply choose to move out the country though. That is not in anyway the same thing as renouncing your faith.Can't the same be said for a person who reaches the age to choose to move and remains in their country?
The US has done some ****** up stuff, one of the biggest being becoming the US. But I'm not moving because some whites killed native americans. Cobra Kai never killed a native american.
Well that's more Thanksgiving than the 4th of July but technically yeah that is what ppl are indirectly celebrating. Same with Columbus Day.If you celebrated the fourth of july, you support the genocide of Native Americans. See how stupid that sounds.
but being a member and continuing to be associated with and promoting it you are supporting the org the good and the bad... Like i said before whether im shipping the dope in, packaging, cooking it, outright selling it, or just being the lookout man, id still be apart of the drug distribution cycle.I really don't think a lot of you understand the church and the day to day lives of Catholics. But, if you're willing to concede that all white Americans can be blamed for slavery, for the same reasons we can blame all Catholics for the acts the church commits, even that catholic in Ks, who has no connections with the attracties of the church other than being a continuing member, and supporting the organization then I've got nothing more to argue.
I don't understand how your not getting the Catholic Church = government connection...like that's almost self evident..but whatever.
I swear, even when cats agree with me, they find a way to make me wrong...NT, goin Nt I guess.
My grandfather new a lot of the Patriarca/Atwells guys back in the day.Real talk... I think my step father may have been Mafia connected... He had 8 years in San Quinton that was never explained... Born and died in deeply Italian RI town...
Can't speak for the Irish mobsters (most of whom are catholic) but the Italians take their religion seriously.
is religion that big among mafiosas? don't know any made men, so i wouldnt know...
also, did anybody want a hot dog after reading the exorcism article?
Idk, I'm not getting it.
Catholic Church - organization whose subjects have agreed to follow its law through threat of force (hell)
Gov. - organization whose subjects agreed to follow its law through threat of force (prison)
Church commits atrocities, every member or supporter is held responsible, forever
Gov commits atrocities, only those alive during the time the atrocities were committed are held responsible.
The Holy See is recognized as a sovereign state
In international law, meaning it is its own Gov. So I don't understand how the church is different from any other sovereign state. Like, I don't understand.
Sovereign state + atrocity = all people part of that sovereign state are to blame. But, the American gov is the exception? I don't get it.
Thought they were already excommunicated or was that the cartel
DIDNT YOU COMMIT SUICIDE?So I guess someone is going to tell me why I can't hold all catholics responsible for the atrocities the church still commits today?
Yeah you just don't get it.Idk, I'm not getting it.
Catholic Church - organization whose subjects have agreed to follow its law through threat of force (hell)
Gov. - organization whose subjects agreed to follow its law through threat of force (prison)
Church commits atrocities, every member or supporter is held responsible, forever
Gov commits atrocities, only those alive during the time the atrocities were committed are held responsible.
The Holy See is recognized as a sovereign state
In international law, meaning it is its own Gov. So I don't understand how the church is different from any other sovereign state. Like, I don't understand.
Sovereign state + atrocity = all people part of that sovereign state are to blame. But, the American gov is the exception? I don't get it.
It's funny cuz the one thing the mafia likes to do is never admit the mafia exists. So seeing this they'd be like so what? They'd be like how can you excommunicate something that isn't real?You can't excommunicate the whole mafia just like that in one big move tho imo.
Well. Tell me. What makes a sovereign state different from a religion, specifically the Catholic Church? It conducts its international affairs as a sovereign state, it has its own gov. It's own laws, it can petition other states to allow its subjects to come under its jurisdiction. Someone, please tell me the difference...we're not even talking about the Holy Roman Empire, were talking about today, in 2014, why isn't the Catholic Church a state?
Well. Tell me. What makes a sovereign state different from a religion, specifically the Catholic Church? It conducts its international affairs as a sovereign state, it has its own gov. It's own laws, it can petition other states to allow its subjects to come under its jurisdiction. Someone, please tell me the difference...we're not even talking about the Holy Roman Empire, were talking about today, in 2014, why isn't the Catholic Church a state?
Because the only punishment the church offers is hell... Which doesn't exist...
Well. Tell me. What makes a sovereign state different from a religion, specifically the Catholic Church? It conducts its international affairs as a sovereign state, it has its own gov. It's own laws, it can petition other states to allow its subjects to come under its jurisdiction. Someone, please tell me the difference...we're not even talking about the Holy Roman Empire, were talking about today, in 2014, why isn't the Catholic Church a state?
Because the only punishment the church offers is hell... Which doesn't exist...
You can't prove it does or doesn't exist now can you?