Where in the hood they giving fitteds out for $15-16 a pop?
Interesting about grey unders in 2007 and 2010, and what Jeter has (white sweatband).^.
I'm seeing that the TBTC (turn back the clock) hats this year will have the flag on them. I know in the past, some teams have just used old TBTC stock to supply "new TBTC" events, or they just wore regular on fields, or they were in fact "new". SO what we see this year may be old stock but with the flag glued on. Beware.
Last year, I know the Reds and Mets had TBTC grey under on fields. The brewers and padres was your regular black under. I have great interest in trying to understand what teams used in the past. I bet some teams did use grey unders at some point in time within the past 5 years, maybe for an obscure TBTC game. Maybe those same caps were worn by various players throughout the season .I could see a mets player wearing the '86 tbtc for regular games. Although the grey under seems somewhat new to 2016 TBTC on fields. Does anyone know any other TBTC on fields that were grey under?
Mlbcollectors.com is good for so much. But those obscure TBTC events and hats are almost not worth their time (one or two games out of a season). But it's cool to look back on. They don't seem to take note of player/equipment differences like you guys mentioned above.. MLBC does note that in 1997 the Angels were one of the only teams to try out black under (keeping with 100% wool and white sweatbands). Yet it wasnt until 98 or 99 that they saw the whole team transition. It's funny when I see these
Custom" grey under Angels fitteds. They should technically be black under "customs"
Craniumfitteds.com sale got extended. Ends tonight. And yeah @alp, I have never seen on fields go for that cheap. We're basically talking $14 pre tax (let alone pre shipping). $16 shipped to your house
Back to the flag on on fields for a minute. I was at a AAA game the other day and noticed almost more people with MLB "on fields" that had flags (like they bought them within the past month) than the non flagged version. They very well be fashion based or "customs". But truly that made me realize, between the fashion varieties and the new on fields, the flag is everywhere, and people don't seem to care. I'll never buy one at retail knowing some custom that looks identical now is half the cost. The flag is everywhere now (what they wanted) but it de legitimizes what an on field used to represent. From a quick glance, I can't tell if these people are wearing some china made custom, or the new on fields. I think thats a sad observation for NE.
If I'm not mistaken that's usually old bs joints, a new era patched joint ain't normally $15
just seen an old lady getting on bus with this same hat lol. It was a snapback tho
That old Bowie Baysox logo from 1993, was much better than today's logo. It added more flair to the hat, the letter ''B'' with the sailboat and the waves, it was really dope. Today's logo is more plain looking to me, really nothing special about it. That's the reason why I don't be buying no Baysox hats, it could have the most sickest looking customade color scheme on the hat and it still wont do it for me cause of the logo being too plain. I'm really picky when it comes to my logo's on the hats and color scheme's.
Cool!
Just in general going back to 2007 black poly era. I find it interesting that such a uniform change is allowed (even for just a game). And if its not a huge uniform deal, I don't know why some teams or players havent done their own thing since the switch on a more consistent basis. Angels had black unders before anyone else for three season. The pirates had red unders for a season. etc..
