But I mentioned that, multiple times.
"Too many INT's"
1 per game.
One.
One is too many. Think about that. It isn't about defending Luck, or any other QB, ONE, a game, is "too many"
Tannehill threw 12. Luck threw 16.
Do those 4 make any sort of impact?
And why didn't the objective writer point out that amount of passes Luck threw, vs INT's? A rate right in line with the best of the best.
You throw 450 passes, 10 INT's, acceptable.
You throw 650 passes, 16 INT's, unacceptable?
How's that work, objectively?
"Too many INT's"
1 per game.
One.
One is too many. Think about that. It isn't about defending Luck, or any other QB, ONE, a game, is "too many"
Tannehill threw 12. Luck threw 16.
Do those 4 make any sort of impact?
And why didn't the objective writer point out that amount of passes Luck threw, vs INT's? A rate right in line with the best of the best.
You throw 450 passes, 10 INT's, acceptable.
You throw 650 passes, 16 INT's, unacceptable?
How's that work, objectively?