- 56,202
- 64,638
- Joined
- May 15, 2003
Fab and French "Ball Drop" >>>> that song
I thought that also. IMO it wasn't pushed enough, but it was on a mixtape
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Fab and French "Ball Drop" >>>> that song
Dudes only care about what's on the radio every 15 minutes.
There's so much hypocrisy and contradictions in this whole argument.
People will talk about relevancy, but what should matter is if it's good. What's lyrical.
I'm still wondering if Desiigner would be acceptable if he was from Atlanta or the south. If so that negates the whole argument. So you don't mind all the copycat south rappers? And you want pats on the back for a bunch of wack non-lyrical rappers. A 20 year old did what he should, rap what's popular and what he hears.
Dudes will **** on French Montana and say he's not lyrical, but then go in a Young Dolph thread.
And the second half of his career has been even better than the first
Lyricism comes in many forms
What forms? There's bad and there's good. You're saying something or not saying anything.
Dudes who say a lot of nothing and you can barely comprehend? Dudes who rap about the same subjects over and over?
If it wasn't for the production who would listen to those dudes? The crazy part is the producer is coming back, but they're still not making the money they should when they're literally making careers. Production makes Future, not what Future is talking about.
Dudes will **** on French Montana and say he's not lyrical, but then go in a Young Dolph thread
Desiinger would get the same exact slander if he was from the south. Stop it. There's a cat from NO that's trying to be young thug...the same way Desiigner is trying to be Future. And he's getting slandered equally. He's just not as popular.
I think the disconnect with you is you are a person that believes that being lyrical = quality. That is not always the case man. And lyricism comes in many forms.
And fab is my guy. He's been consistent for a very long time. But outside of NY and the Tri state..nobody is really "bumping him".
What? Maybe it's just nostalgia...but Fab when he came out >>>> Fab now. I was just bumping that "Renegade" freestyle with him and Paul Cain. Fab had a good mix of mainstream hits, mixtapes, and solid albums.
Comes in many forms. You look at lyricism as dudes who use multi-sllyables, double entendres, hidden meanings and stuff as many words into a bar as they can. That's "a form of lyricism".
There's also lyricism in people that say real sht. Relatable heartfelt lyrics and give it to you straight forward. Like a prime "Boosie" or Pac. That's a form of lyricism as well.
You can have somebody have a bunch of complex rap schemes...and they rap about absoltuey nothing. Or you can have somebody whose rapping in a "simpler" way...and connect with you.
Comes in many forms. You look at lyricism as dudes who use multi-sllyables, double entendres, hidden meanings and stuff as many words into a bar as they can. That's "a form of lyricism".
There's also lyricism in people that say real sht. Relatable heartfelt lyrics and give it to you straight forward. Like a prime "Boosie" or Pac. That's a form of lyricism as well.
You can have somebody have a bunch of complex rap schemes...and they rap about absoltuey nothing. Or you can have somebody whose rapping in a "simpler" way...and connect with you.
I agree with this wholeheartedly, coming from NYC it took me a while to accept because most of the guys i grew up listening to were doing both (using complex rap schemes & still saying real ****). The dude who switched my entire thought process on this was Pac (when i grew older) & Jeezy. The point of lyrics is to paint an image and draw feeling with the listener, that can be done without all the complex metaphors and double meanings.
A good example of this is Lupe, while he has always been extremely lyrical, during F&L/ The Cool he was still able to do that and convey his message clearly. Now compare that to T&Y which dropped he has lyrically gone to an even higher level lyrically but it's gotten so advanced that IMO it's more like a novel than music (Not that it isn't dope, but you literally need to STUDY the ****** music to really appreciate certain things).
And most of the dudes who you're trying to take up for are saying the same thing every single song about the same subject.
How many different ways you can hustling? sex? drugs? How many people can you kill?
Don't put Tupac in that category.
There's absolutely no diversity in these guys much less creativity in doing it. That's why everyones a rapper. Because being a rapper is easy now.
What do you mean "take up for"? Name most of these dudes you're talking about.
And idk why you think dudes soley rap about "hustling, drugs and sex".
As for the "newer rappers"...I listen to Future, Cole, Kendrick, Kodak Black, Bankroll Fresh off the top of my head. In the case of Future & Kodak (who I'm sure you're referring to), they rap about a lot more than just "drugs, killing and sex"....and rap about it in different ways...different flows, rhyme patterns, lingo and melodies/harmonies.
You said early that without production....nobody would listen to these dudes. Beat selection and production is part of being a rapper. That should never be a knock. Not only that...it's about what you actually do with the beat. You could give "March madness" to your local rappity rapper, lyrics lyrics lyrics rapper...and that sht would be phony.
I'm not listening to a rapper with wack production or no relatability. No matter how many syllables he can stuff into a bar.
Think that would be a waste of a beat.I'd listen to Future over an Alchemist beat if that means anything
Don't need Future over them dusty *** beats just let Metro Boomin executive produce a project where he works exclusively with Zay and Organized Noize
This is why rap trash now
Zero respect for its legends