ice city fc
Banned
- 5,031
- 2,109
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2013
For a city championed for the culture and diversity of its residents, San Francisco has become shockingly homogenous.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
thats the best situation imo...find a nice spot right outside the city where you have access to everything, but still have your space, quiet, and not having to worry about police and dumb **** going on on every cornerLiving in the suburbs with close proximity to the city>>>
I live 15 mins from DC, but im looking outside to the woods with deer, foxes, raccoons and ****. Silence.
how do these areas crumble when property values skyrocket? when an area is deemed "up and coming," rent and housing exponentially rise.
if you mean crumble in terms of culturally and in terms of character, i completely agree. its sad seeing small, local business replaced with larger, and often more expensive corporate brands.
however, its not just a taste of saying they lived somewhere, cities are much more convenient to live in and young people are realizing that. also, many of these people aren't having kids or if they do, they ARE staying.
until suburbs move away from these antiquated, sprawled out, car-centric models that are the norm, younger people will continue to flock to urban areas.
Living in the suburbs with close proximity to the city>>>
I live 15 mins from DC, but im looking outside to the woods with deer, foxes, raccoons and ****. Silence.
this is a perfect way to describe it! lolFor a city championed for the culture and diversity of its residents, San Francisco has become shockingly homogenous.
What kind of "hood" do you live in where houses get sold for 1.6 mill lol
In the 60's the housing associations wouldnt make cetain areas available to minorities. They only offered the most depleated part of the city to these individuals creating ghettos. Just like how blacks and Latino's were not allowed to live in some parts of LA, they were forced to live in area with poor housing plumbing etc like East LA and Watts.Did blacks get priced out of SF and moved to Oakland or what? Or have they never really had a presence in SF? Even though there is a huge property value difference, there is rent control, so that's how folks like ninjahood are living in manhattan still since their families have been there for decades. I never understood how SF could be so White and Asian and Oakland could be so Black, when they're separated by just a bridge.
Camden is in South jersey right across the bridge from Philly, not NY...and Oakland always did its own thing, i wouldn't call it a little brother city to SF..same with Flint, it had its own auto making industry separate from Detroit.Did blacks get priced out of SF and moved to Oakland or what? Or have they never really had a presence in SF? Even though there is a huge property value difference, there is rent control, so that's how folks like ninjahood are living in manhattan still since their families have been there for decades. I never understood how SF could be so White and Asian and Oakland could be so Black, when they're separated by just a bridge.
In the 60's the housing associations wouldnt make cetain areas available to minorities. They only offered the most depleated part of the city to these individuals creating ghettos. Just like how blacks and Latino's were not allowed to live in some parts of LA, they were forced to live in area with poor housing plumbing etc like East LA and Watts.
In addition back when the country was more industrial every major city had a "little brother city" where they would have a lot of their factories and their waste plants. Many african amercians would live in these cities because they could work in these factories. Then when the factories left the Major city would still be doing well while the "little brother city" quickly went down hill and were really unhealthy to live in. St Louis had East St Louis, Detroit had Flint, New York had Camden, LA had Compton and SF had Oakland.
i thought so, like when people really be from Farmington Hills but say they from Detroit when theyre out of townIt's like the Bay Area (which is short for San Francisco Bay Area) which has multiple cities other than SF.but aint places like Culver City, Santa Monica, etc in LA the city? or whats happenin
When people say LA, they're referring to LA County, which includes cities other than Los Angeles like Santa Monica, Culver City, etc.
only problem with that is Flint aint close to Detroit at all. . . . Ann Arbor is closer to Detroit than FlintIn the 60's the housing associations wouldnt make cetain areas available to minorities. They only offered the most depleated part of the city to these individuals creating ghettos. Just like how blacks and Latino's were not allowed to live in some parts of LA, they were forced to live in area with poor housing plumbing etc like East LA and Watts.Did blacks get priced out of SF and moved to Oakland or what? Or have they never really had a presence in SF? Even though there is a huge property value difference, there is rent control, so that's how folks like ninjahood are living in manhattan still since their families have been there for decades. I never understood how SF could be so White and Asian and Oakland could be so Black, when they're separated by just a bridge.
In addition back when the country was more industrial every major city had a "little brother city" where they would have a lot of their factories and their waste plants. Many african amercians would live in these cities because they could work in these factories. Then when the factories left the Major city would still be doing well while the "little brother city" quickly went down hill and were really unhealthy to live in. St Louis had East St Louis, Detroit had Flint, New York had Camden, LA had Compton and SF had Oakland.
only problem with that is Flint aint close to Detroit at all. . . . Ann Arbor is closer to Detroit than FlintDid blacks get priced out of SF and moved to Oakland or what? Or have they never really had a presence in SF? Even though there is a huge property value difference, there is rent control, so that's how folks like ninjahood are living in manhattan still since their families have been there for decades. I never understood how SF could be so White and Asian and Oakland could be so Black, when they're separated by just a bridge.
In the 60's the housing associations wouldnt make cetain areas available to minorities. They only offered the most depleated part of the city to these individuals creating ghettos. Just like how blacks and Latino's were not allowed to live in some parts of LA, they were forced to live in area with poor housing plumbing etc like East LA and Watts.
In addition back when the country was more industrial every major city had a "little brother city" where they would have a lot of their factories and their waste plants. Many african amercians would live in these cities because they could work in these factories. Then when the factories left the Major city would still be doing well while the "little brother city" quickly went down hill and were really unhealthy to live in. St Louis had East St Louis, Detroit had Flint, New York had Camden, LA had Compton and SF had Oakland.
Ann Arbor isn't close to Detroit either tho (which was my point)Ann Arbor didn't do as much auto-manufacturing as Flint though.only problem with that is Flint aint close to Detroit at all. . . . Ann Arbor is closer to Detroit than FlintIn the 60's the housing associations wouldnt make cetain areas available to minorities. They only offered the most depleated part of the city to these individuals creating ghettos. Just like how blacks and Latino's were not allowed to live in some parts of LA, they were forced to live in area with poor housing plumbing etc like East LA and Watts.Did blacks get priced out of SF and moved to Oakland or what? Or have they never really had a presence in SF? Even though there is a huge property value difference, there is rent control, so that's how folks like ninjahood are living in manhattan still since their families have been there for decades. I never understood how SF could be so White and Asian and Oakland could be so Black, when they're separated by just a bridge.
In addition back when the country was more industrial every major city had a "little brother city" where they would have a lot of their factories and their waste plants. Many african amercians would live in these cities because they could work in these factories. Then when the factories left the Major city would still be doing well while the "little brother city" quickly went down hill and were really unhealthy to live in. St Louis had East St Louis, Detroit had Flint, New York had Camden, LA had Compton and SF had Oakland.
i still visit lil havana , they got the best fritas and pan con bisteqYou not far from me bruh. I used to stay on 10th ave in East Lil Havana but I HAD to get up outta there, now I'm on 22 ave near Flagler, still "candela" as they say but ain't gotta worry about no stray fi'e or nothing
The amount of "educated young adults" taking over Harlem and Brooklyn, they getting people tf outta there
Harlem and Brooklyn shrinking
Bronx will always be a hell hole tho, there isn't any saving the Bronx. That's Iraq.
doesnt mean a retailers can survive on just gentrifers...if da hood dont support them they'll up and leave.business's get bought out