- 3,603
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2007
I don't think a Rose/Wade backcourt would be sick at all. They both need to be primary ballhandlers in order to be effective.
Rumor: Miami Rejected Amare for Marion/Beasley
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by youngtriz,
- Start date
- 4,058
- 11
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2007
I would have rejected too. Chill on Beasletys first year. Son will be the truth mark my words, and Marion is a sick player AND an expiring contract. + Amarecan very well peace in 2010 anyway which means Miami would give up cap space and their future big man for a player who would leave them which would probablyprompt Wade to leave also if he has no cast. Good move by Riley IMO, you dont trade your #2 pick in his rookie year, esp one who was like NCAA POY as affreshman
And Amare playes 0 D
And Amare playes 0 D
DYNAMICS
formerly diplomat tdot
- 28,602
- 3,814
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2002
/thread.Originally Posted by Carlos Tevez
If Miami were really offered this trade, it's a no-brainer to turn it down. Beasley has a huge upside, along with Wade and some serious cap room in the summer of 09 and 2010, Miami will be a force to be reckoned with.
Heat fans, we'll gladly give you Jermaine O'Neal for Marion's expiring deal
- 5,416
- 12
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2005
No way.
- 1,297
- 544
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2004
I am a Heat fan, and I think Riley is a smart for not doing this trade. Amare plays no defense, and he needs others to set up his shot. Sure he scores 20 anight, but he also gives up about that much. I always found it kind of odd that a guy that athletic and big can barely get one block a game. Wade is a bettershot blocker then Amare. That tells you all you need to know about this guys defense.
All those people who are down on Beasley must not watch Heat game. This guy is getting like less than 24min (23.4 to be exact) a game. On games that he doesget burn, he produces. Mayo and Rose get over 37 min a game, and they have the green light to shoot whenever they want.
- 629
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2007
Everyone knows the way to a NBA Title is to have at least 2 Superstars. I did say 2010 so none of usincluding you would know what kind of roster Chicago will have in 2 seasons.Wade & Rose with solid role players would contend year in & year out. If Wade really wanted to be in Miami so badly he would have resigned for 5yrslike Carmelo did, but instead did the 3yr contract. Wade already has his ring & may want to bring back a Title to Chicago & create his Legacy in hishometown. So do yourself the favor & ease off because all I said was a Wade & Rose backcourt would be sick not that it will happen. Some NTers doanything for attention.Originally Posted by YoungTriz
the only reason wade would go to chicago its because its his home town... which he probably visits all the time in the off season anyways..what do the bulls have to offer wade besides rose?? beasley & chalmers >> rose.... plus marions 17mil contracts ends..Originally Posted by NICEFITDOMINICAN
You said it Perfectly... Amare doesn't have a clue what Defense is... Beasley is just a rookie with potential & his contract is cheap... D Wade may go home to Chicago in 2010... A Rose & Wade backcourt would be sick...Originally Posted by chinoman1782
Mavs fans be killin me.
Why would we want to trade Beasley who's rookie contract helps us for what Riles wants to do for Amare. We don't need a big man that plays no d here. This team plays in the east and over here defense is Spolstras main focus.
plus wade knows that the heat are his team.... the heat are gonna find players to build around wade.... so why would wade go to team just for a #1 draft pick...
- 5,299
- 273
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2007
THANK YOU RILEY FOR NOT PULLING THE TRIGGER.
why trade a marginal asset and the potential of a #2 overall for an Amare 17 month rental??
unless they agree to a contract extension
. i would rather keep the booksclear for '10 to lock up wade and make a run at nash/bosh/ETC because i dont think wade+amare can run the east for say the next 5 years.
why trade a marginal asset and the potential of a #2 overall for an Amare 17 month rental??
unless they agree to a contract extension
- 12,911
- 843
- Joined
- May 4, 2005
Originally Posted by NICEFITDOMINICAN
Everyone knows the way to a NBA Title is to have at least 2 Superstars. I did say 2010 so none of us including you would know what kind of roster Chicago will have in 2 seasons. Wade & Rose with solid role players would contend year in & year out. If Wade really wanted to be in Miami so badly he would have resigned for 5yrs like Carmelo did, but instead did the 3yr contract. Wade already has his ring & may want to bring back a Title to Chicago & create his Legacy in his hometown. So do yourself the favor & ease off because all I said was a Wade & Rose backcourt would be sick not that it will happen. Some NTers do anything for attention.Originally Posted by YoungTriz
the only reason wade would go to chicago its because its his home town... which he probably visits all the time in the off season anyways..what do the bulls have to offer wade besides rose?? beasley & chalmers >> rose.... plus marions 17mil contracts ends..Originally Posted by NICEFITDOMINICAN
You said it Perfectly... Amare doesn't have a clue what Defense is... Beasley is just a rookie with potential & his contract is cheap... D Wade may go home to Chicago in 2010... A Rose & Wade backcourt would be sick...Originally Posted by chinoman1782
Mavs fans be killin me.
Why would we want to trade Beasley who's rookie contract helps us for what Riles wants to do for Amare. We don't need a big man that plays no d here. This team plays in the east and over here defense is Spolstras main focus.
plus wade knows that the heat are his team.... the heat are gonna find players to build around wade.... so why would wade go to team just for a #1 draft pick...
- 2,805
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
a trade of this magnitude needs 3 teams
- 1,297
- 544
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2004
Not really. As long as the salaries match, it can be done. In this case, the salaries match.
- 7,769
- 2,050
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2007
Originally Posted by NICEFITDOMINICAN
Everyone knows the way to a NBA Title is to have at least 2 Superstars. I did say 2010 so none of us including you would know what kind of roster Chicago will have in 2 seasons. Wade & Rose with solid role players would contend year in & year out. If Wade really wanted to be in Miami so badly he would have resigned for 5yrs like Carmelo did, but instead did the 3yr contract. Wade already has his ring & may want to bring back a Title to Chicago & create his Legacy in his hometown. So do yourself the favor & ease off because all I said was a Wade & Rose backcourt would be sick not that it will happen. Some NTers do anything for attention.Originally Posted by YoungTriz
the only reason wade would go to chicago its because its his home town... which he probably visits all the time in the off season anyways..what do the bulls have to offer wade besides rose?? beasley & chalmers >> rose.... plus marions 17mil contracts ends..Originally Posted by NICEFITDOMINICAN
You said it Perfectly... Amare doesn't have a clue what Defense is... Beasley is just a rookie with potential & his contract is cheap... D Wade may go home to Chicago in 2010... A Rose & Wade backcourt would be sick...Originally Posted by chinoman1782
Mavs fans be killin me.
Why would we want to trade Beasley who's rookie contract helps us for what Riles wants to do for Amare. We don't need a big man that plays no d here. This team plays in the east and over here defense is Spolstras main focus.
plus wade knows that the heat are his team.... the heat are gonna find players to build around wade.... so why would wade go to team just for a #1 draft pick...
3 years at 60 million>>>5 years at 80 million. 'Melo was just stupid.
arstyle27
Supporter
- 10,505
- 3,548
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2001
Yes....Wade to Chicago in 2010.
And for the record, winning in Chicago will always....always > winning in Miami.
And for the record, winning in Chicago will always....always > winning in Miami.
- 591
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
good rejection
- 4,751
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2004
Get out of here with that crap.
Be happy with your boy Rose, cause yall won't sniff DWade in '10
- 6,781
- 1,025
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2004
Wade is not going to no damn Chicago
- 7,993
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2007
Keep dreaming doggie.
- 17,900
- 793
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
Originally Posted by 8tothe24
Here is the biggest deal breaker, Beasley is 20, Amare is 26 (like you said, those knees are not getting younger). The East is owned by CLE and BOS right now. Unless Miami can make a serious move, then they would be crazy to make that deal. Wade's future is uncertain, so dumping a top pick is out of the question. If they can sign/trade Marion (Bulls might be willing to do something) at the end of the year for some descent role players then Miami would be set to make a run in 2-3 years when Boston is over.Originally Posted by worldbeefreeg
Originally Posted by Mateen Cleaves
Amare has never been the same player that he was since he injured his knee, and is one of the worst defensive big men in the league. Isn't a good rebounder or shot blocker either. He is a force in the post and has stepped up his range, but Beasley is far more versatile offensively and will ene up getting better on D. Dude is a tremendous rebounder. He has played so well in his limited minutes this year and will be an all-star within two years.
Leave my struggling franchise/front office all the way out of this one please.
Sincerly Yours,
Bulls Fans Across The Land.
- 16,732
- 14
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
sheed/AI for Jrich/Amare!
