- 11,640
- 506
Screw it.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by TheGift23,
- Start date
- 105
- 10
Entertaining game
Unfortunately, the entertainment value for most Skins fans was not whether or not we would win but rather how we would lose.
Unfortunately, the entertainment value for most Skins fans was not whether or not we would win but rather how we would lose.
- 14,666
- 2,207
No I don't but I also don't make an absolute opinion based off of ONE close game either. Sure the Skins got screwed on that fumble in OTbut the saints still scored the tying TD and made the pick on Campbell. Take the records out of the picture and no matter what you or anyone says the Vikingshave played ONE TOUGH OPPONENT all season. They're schedule has been weak, therefore they aren't impressive to me. I have a right to my own opiniondon't I?Originally Posted by JPZx
The Titans had the best record in the NFL last year....by your logic they were the best team in the NFL.
No wonder your opinions suck. You just stare at records and formulate opinions based strictly on that.
EDIT: Are the Saints still a great team? Without a doubt. But how, after this performance, is anyone able think that they are the best team in the NFL, let alone the NFC? It was the Deadskins...
- 6,382
- 4,145
- 7,349
- 243
Seriously though, how have they not cut Suisham by now? Dude has been hot garbage ever since he's been here.
In the long run though this is the best possible outcome like I've been saying all year. We played a pretty damn good game but still lost so we can get agood draft pick.
- 3,606
- 760
Like, I really want to watch some more football, but I just can't today. I'm done.Originally Posted by The Natural Mystic
Im just hurt right now...its not even funny.
- 11,640
- 506
Vikings ScheduleOriginally Posted by ExtRaOrDinaRy SwAg
No I don't but I also don't make an absolute opinion based off of ONE close game either. Sure the Skins got screwed on that fumble in OT but the saints still scored the tying TD and made the pick on Campbell. Take the records out of the picture and no matter what you or anyone says the Vikings have played ONE TOUGH GAME all season. They're schedule has been weak, therefore they aren't impressive to me. I have a right to my own opinion don't I?Originally Posted by JPZx
The Titans had the best record in the NFL last year....by your logic they were the best team in the NFL.
No wonder your opinions suck. You just stare at records and formulate opinions based strictly on that.
EDIT: Are the Saints still a great team? Without a doubt. But how, after this performance, is anyone able think that they are the best team in the NFL, let alone the NFC? It was the Deadskins...
| Regular Season Schedule/Results | |||||||
| WK | DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | W-L | HI PASSING | HI RUSHING | HI RECEIVING |
| 1 | Sun, Sep 13 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/cle.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Cleveland | W 34-20 | 1-0 | Favre 110 | Peterson 180 | Harvin 36 |
| 2 | Sun, Sep 20 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/det.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Detroit | W 27-13 | 2-0 | Favre 155 | Peterson 92 | Berrian 46 |
| 3 | Sun, Sep 27 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/sfo.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">San Francisco | W 27-24 | 3-0 | Favre 301 | Peterson 85 | Taylor 70 |
| 4 | Mon, Oct 5 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/gnb.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Green Bay | W 30-23 | 4-0 | Favre 271 | Peterson 55 | Berrian 75 |
| 5 | Sun, Oct 11 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/stl.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ St. Louis | W 38-10 | 5-0 | Favre 232 | Peterson 63 | Harvin 66 |
| 6 | Sun, Oct 18 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/bal.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Baltimore | W 33-31 | 6-0 | Favre 278 | Peterson 143 | Rice 176 |
| 7 | Sun, Oct 25 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/pit.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Pittsburgh | L 17-27 | 6-1 | Favre 334 | Peterson 69 | Rice 136 |
| 8 | Sun, Nov 1 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/gnb.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Green Bay | W 38-26 | 7-1 | Favre 244 | Peterson 97 | Harvin 84 |
| 9 | BYE WEEK | ||||||
| 10 | Sun, Nov 15 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/det.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Detroit | W 27-10 | 8-1 | Favre 344 | Peterson 133 | Rice 201 |
| 11 | Sun, Nov 22 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/sea.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Seattle | W 35-9 | 9-1 | Favre 213 | Peterson 82 | Rice 89 |
| 12 | Sun, Nov 29 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/chi.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Chicago | W 36-10 | 10-1 | Favre 392 | Peterson 85 | Harvin 101 |
| WK | DATE | OPPONENT | TIME (ET) | TV | TICKETS | LOCATION | |
| 13 | Sun, Dec 6 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/ari.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Arizona | 8:20 PM | NBC | Tickets | U of Phoenix Stadium | |
| 14 | Sun, Dec 13 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/cin.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Cincinnati | 1:00 PM | CBS | Tickets | Metrodome | |
| 15 | Sun, Dec 20 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/car.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Carolina | 8:20 PM | NBC | Tickets | Bank of America Stadium | |
| 16 | Mon, Dec 28 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/chi.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Chicago | 8:30 PM | ESPN | Tickets | Soldier Field | |
| 17 | Sun, Jan 3 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/nyg.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">NY Giants | 1:00 PM | FOX | Tickets | Metrodome |
Saints Schedule
| Regular Season Schedule/Results | |||||||
| WK | DATE | OPPONENT | RESULT | W-L | HI PASSING | HI RUSHING | HI RECEIVING |
| 1 | Sun, Sep 13 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/det.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Detroit | W 45-27 | 1-0 | Brees 358 | Bell 143 | Henderson 103 |
| 2 | Sun, Sep 20 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/phi.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Philadelphia | W 48-22 | 2-0 | Brees 311 | Bell 86 | Colston 98 |
| 3 | Sun, Sep 27 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/buf.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Buffalo | W 27-7 | 3-0 | Brees 172 | Thomas 126 | Colston 67 |
| 4 | Sun, Oct 4 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/nyj.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">NY Jets | W 24-10 | 4-0 | Brees 190 | Thomas 86 | Thomas 46 |
| 5 | BYE WEEK | ||||||
| 6 | Sun, Oct 18 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/nyg.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">NY Giants | W 48-27 | 5-0 | Brees 369 | Thomas 72 | Colston 166 |
| 7 | Sun, Oct 25 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/mia.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Miami | W 46-34 | 6-0 | Brees 298 | Bell 80 | Shockey 105 |
| 8 | Mon, Nov 2 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/atl.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Atlanta | W 35-27 | 7-0 | Brees 308 | Thomas 91 | Colston 85 |
| 9 | Sun, Nov 8 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/car.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Carolina | W 30-20 | 8-0 | Brees 330 | Thomas 50 | Meachem 98 |
| 10 | Sun, Nov 15 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/stl.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ St. Louis | W 28-23 | 9-0 | Brees 223 | Bush 83 | Henderson 72 |
| 11 | Sun, Nov 22 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/tam.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Tampa Bay | W 38-7 | 10-0 | Brees 187 | Thomas 92 | Colston 74 |
| 12 | Mon, Nov 30 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/nwe.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">New England | W 38-17 | 11-0 | Brees 371 | Thomas 64 | Colston 121 |
| 13 | Sun, Dec 6 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/was.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Washington | W 33-30 OT | 12-0 | Brees 419 | Bell 34 | Meachem 142 |
| WK | DATE | OPPONENT | TIME (ET) | TV | TICKETS | LOCATION | |
| 14 | Sun, Dec 13 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/atl.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Atlanta | 1:00 PM | FOX | Tickets | Georgia Dome | |
| 15 | Sat, Dec 19 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/dal.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Dallas | 8:20 PM | NFL | Tickets | Superdome | |
| 16 | Sun, Dec 27 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/tam.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">Tampa Bay | 1:00 PM | FOX | Tickets | Superdome | |
| 17 | Sun, Jan 3 | http://a.espncdn.com/i/te...s/nfl/med/trans/car.gif) no-repeat scroll 100px -15px; -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-origin: padding; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous;" align="left">@ Carolina | 1:00 PM | FOX | Tickets | Bank of America Stadium |
You got to be out of your mind if you still think the Vikings are the better team.
- 16,335
- 13
When did you get so damn annoying, JPZ?
jpzx
Supporter
- 58,526
- 27,909
Of course you are entitled to your opinion, but:Originally Posted by ExtRaOrDinaRy SwAg
No I don't but I also don't make an absolute opinion based off of ONE close game either. Sure the Skins got screwed on that fumble in OT but the saints still scored the tying TD and made the pick on Campbell. Take the records out of the picture and no matter what you or anyone says the Vikings have played ONE TOUGH GAME all season. They're schedule has been weak, therefore they aren't impressive to me. I have a right to my own opinion don't I?Originally Posted by JPZx
The Titans had the best record in the NFL last year....by your logic they were the best team in the NFL.
No wonder your opinions suck. You just stare at records and formulate opinions based strictly on that.
EDIT: Are the Saints still a great team? Without a doubt. But how, after this performance, is anyone able think that they are the best team in the NFL, let alone the NFC? It was the Deadskins...
1.) You are basing your opinion off of the Vikings ONE close game loss to the Steelers (
2.) The Saints have had plenty of close games. The St. Louis Rams were one hail mary pass away from beating the Saints a few weeks ago...and the Saints neededunlikely comebacks to beat the Panthers and Dolphins. And now the ******** game today...
Last week I said that the Saints are without a doubt the best team in the NFL. Things change and opinions change as the weeks progress. After seeing this gameI wouldn't call the Saints the best team in the NFL anymore.
The Colts handily beat one of the hottest teams in the NFL today, while the Saints struggled to beat a 3-8 (now 3-9) team
...
nycknicks...you just posted the two teams schedules. You didn't make a point.
- 1,045
- 61
seriously, who cares who's better now? it doesn't matter until january.
jpzx
Supporter
- 58,526
- 27,909
When Brett Favre arrived.
True.
I'm just heated right now. I gotta relax...
- 11,640
- 506
My point is...Lookng at the schedules the Vikings obviously have the easier schedule to deal with than the Saints.
- 25,503
- 666
QFT
Los Angeles
formerly bright nikes
- 23,216
- 4,883
damn jpz let it go.
jpzx
Supporter
- 58,526
- 27,909
QFT.
My teams bring out the worst in me. I feel like I need to defend them at all times, when I don't. I gotta just relax man.
- 58,750
- 30,152
Saints on the road in a tough environment against an awesome defense where Campbell has a career game...I think that clearly shows how great the Saints arethis year. Are they better than Minnesota? I could care less right now.
If these two teams are the top two teams in the Conference then we will find out in the NFC Championship game no? That's when we find out the best in theConference. Saints and Colts can own the regular season for all I care.
If these two teams are the top two teams in the Conference then we will find out in the NFC Championship game no? That's when we find out the best in theConference. Saints and Colts can own the regular season for all I care.
- 58,750
- 30,152
Saints on the road in a tough environment against an awesome defense where Campbell has a career game...I think that clearly shows how great the Saints arethis year. Are they better than Minnesota? I could care less right now.
If these two teams are the top two teams in the Conference then we will find out in the NFC Championship game no? Then we can talk best in the Conference.Saints and Colts can own the regular season for all I care.
If these two teams are the top two teams in the Conference then we will find out in the NFC Championship game no? Then we can talk best in the Conference.Saints and Colts can own the regular season for all I care.
- 21,151
- 37
I was so busy this afternoon, but I caught bits and pieces of the game.
Tell me...is there another team in the NFL who finds a way to lose more than the Skins? They had the game at hand, but it WOULD happen to a ******** kicker tomiss a 20 yard chip shot...it WOULD happen to a ******** DB to lose a fumble off of a INT and have it taken to the house...it WOULD happen to Mike Sellers tofumble in a key situation (See the Cincy game last year)....it's frustrating, but expected....
I gotta gave the boy Devin Thomas props for playing like a @#*@#@+ man today.
I can't wait for the offseason overhaul of sucky vets....
*again...is it me, or is the offense BETTER without Portis, Cooley, and Samuels? This season, I like the tandem of Cartwright/Ganther > Portis/Betts...
Tell me...is there another team in the NFL who finds a way to lose more than the Skins? They had the game at hand, but it WOULD happen to a ******** kicker tomiss a 20 yard chip shot...it WOULD happen to a ******** DB to lose a fumble off of a INT and have it taken to the house...it WOULD happen to Mike Sellers tofumble in a key situation (See the Cincy game last year)....it's frustrating, but expected....
I gotta gave the boy Devin Thomas props for playing like a @#*@#@+ man today.
I can't wait for the offseason overhaul of sucky vets....
*again...is it me, or is the offense BETTER without Portis, Cooley, and Samuels? This season, I like the tandem of Cartwright/Ganther > Portis/Betts...
- 12,209
- 277
Honestly, what is that about? How do you not get the offense clicking with the stars in? Is it playcalling? Is it the defense not having enough film on theback-ups?
That's so damn backwards, it's not even funny.
INTLplayers
formerly xcg11pinoYx
- 4,579
- 190
^^either way we're going to need a tandem at RB next year..Cartwright shut me up about deserving a spot on this team, he's a leader and whichever areahe chosen to contribute at next year, I will support (except KR).
If we can somehow get Mitchell and Kelly more involved the rest of this season, no doubt we have a bright spot at that position.
Draft OL, RB, and secondary and don't look back.
If we can somehow get Mitchell and Kelly more involved the rest of this season, no doubt we have a bright spot at that position.
Draft OL, RB, and secondary and don't look back.
- 21,151
- 37
I know it sounds backwards
lilstarz07
Banned
- 3,227
- 10
at least you all have a team who tries hard and plays gutsy ... sellers had tears in his eyes ... you think anyone on dallas would ever cry about a game or aplay during a game? ... the last person on the cowboys who actually cared about a loss would be TO and gets clowned for it ...
i woud love to be a skins fan today ... team played their #%*@% off ... jason campbell showed promise ... your receivers played good ... fred davis ... backuprbs ...
%%*! ...
i woud love to be a skins fan today ... team played their #%*@% off ... jason campbell showed promise ... your receivers played good ... fred davis ... backuprbs ...
%%*! ...
- 4,584
- 53
******** are a backwards team...the "better" or "more effective" players aren't/weren't getting the appropriate time in thegame...with the right management they could be a .500 team or a few games away and on the rise...they're bad but its not the talent that's the issue
INTLplayers
formerly xcg11pinoYx
- 4,579
- 190
I would say getting something in return for Portis would be the better option...having Cooley and Davis on the field at the same time would be nasty
- 7,349
- 243
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
I know it sounds backwards...but it's strange, and I don't know the reasoning behind it. I don't know if it's Sherm Lewis taking over playcalling from Zorn, or if it's the absence of Portis, Cooley, and Samuels...whatever the reason, this team has been better at putting points on the board over the past 4-5 weeks...
co-sign x1000000000
i woud love to be a skins fan today ... team played their #%*@% off ... jason campbell showed promise ... your receivers played good ... fred davis ... backup rbs ...
bittersweet loss because the dudes played well enough to win...but found a way to lose. These guys really care...the young guys stepped up.
*Call me crazy, but I would trade Cooley and try to get a draft pick or two in return...I think Davis has a higher ceiling....I know Cooley is a top 5 TE in the game when healthy, but I'm all for rebuilding by way of the youth movement.
I agree. I love Cooley but it seems like Fred Davis isn't a downgrade at all. Davis and Yoder (with Kozlowski every once in awhile when wefeel like signing him off the street) is good enough. I'd rather get rid of Portis for a pick or O-lineman and draft a RB in the mid rounds thisyear.
And yea, as ridiculous of a loss as this was, I was proud of the way we fought, and I have been all year. Clearly we don't have all the pieces to be a goodteam right now, but these guys are really giving it their all out there. That's been one of my gripes with the team ever since I can remember, is that theyreally aren't going all in. Not this year though; they really seem to be giving a full effort. Devin Thomas has stepped up lately and Campbell lookedpretty good. If we could just patch together an O-line and get a serviceable running back, we'd be able to contend for a playoff spot next year.
Similar threads
