SMH @ Democrats vol. vent

nyvictory45

Banned
685
10
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Well now that the Pennsylvania primary has come and gone and Hillary got an impressive win I can already see in my head the Democrats losing in November. Whatshould have been a sure win for them after 8 terrible years of Republicans running things
sick.gif
is starting to look more and more dubious. And I already know what some of youare thinking and waiting to post: That Hillary has gone too negative and made this less about the democrats than it is about her and blah and blah, I wish shewould trip into a blackhole, etc.
grin.gif


In my opinion that's nonsense. Although Hillary did ignite the negativity between the two candidates I actually think its best the democrats get it out ofthe way now so that the public can become fatigued with the dumb soundbytes and stories. And the notion that showing a 1 second image of Osama Bin Laden is toonegative is nonsense especially considering the two ads the Republicans are getting ready to put out in NC and other states.
eyes.gif


But enough about Hill-rod. I think the real problem is the voters themselves. These visceral, irrational, spiteful, democratic, crybaby voters. Many of theexit polls from Pennsylvania and even before that are showing a disturbing trend between the two fragmented coalitions of Hillary and Obama and that supposedlymany of the supporters of each of them will not vote for the other or even vote Republican.
indifferent.gif


And I've seen this type of nonsense on here as well. The main culprits, as shown by polls, have been low-income white catholics, African-Americans, youngvoters, middle-aged white women, and possibly hispanics. I'm not asking why these groups say they won't vote in November or will vote Republican,I'm asking why these people think their reasons make any sense at all. I already also know the common lines of argument that will be put forth as to whythey hate the other candidate and why they should drop out or they won't vote.

-It's mathematically impossible for Hillary to win. She needs to drop out and stop wasting time so Democrats can come together.
-I hate Hillary and her negative campaigns. She and Bill have 789 different scandals and I don't respect her so I won't vote for her if she gets thenomination. She's too sneaky and untrustworthy and she's using Rovian tactics.
-Barack is out of touch, he doesn't understand the common American citizen, he called me bitter, he's a bad bowler, he's an elitist from Harvardwho looks down on me.
-Barack is too extreme a liberal. He's the most liberal Senator and he knows this radical guy Ayers, and he attended a Church with a questionable pastor.He'll either put a bunch of black panthers in the white house or he might turn the U.S. into a socialist nation.

There are a hundred other idiotic arguments like these that democrats have been using against one another. We should fully expect the Republicans to use someof these peripheral issues to smear the character of the democrats since they cannot win on the issues but to use them against one another is becoming amasochistic exercise whereby democrats begin engaging in the same type of thinking and politics that they originally set out to eliminate at the start of thiselection cycle.

So what ever happened to the atmosphere of mutual respect between the supporters of each candidate? A few months ago everyone was talking about a dream ticketand how the Republicans would be destroyed and the country would have either the first African-American or first woman President to truly start leading us intothe 21st century. It seems to me that once the two candidates got a little tougher all of a sudden all the supporters wanted to get nasty toward one another aswell as the opposite candidate and soon enough we had a bunch of little democratic Sean Hannity's running around spreading and repeating nonsense to try todiscredit the other candidate while simultaneously trying to scare everyone by saying they won't vote if their guy or girl doesn't win. How stupid doesthis sound?

I'll admit I too fell into this state of mind. It was my candidate or nothing. I would consider Mc.Cain or might not vote at all because my candidate isbetter and deserved it. Then one day while watching Fox News and angrily thinking in my head how dumb and ridiculous the station and its supporters must be andwondering how anyone could take this drivel seriously I realized that I too began to sound like them. When debating family members or friends I started tobring up the distractive, illogical crap that doesn't help the candidates and more importantly not the country. The line of decency and logic which hadpreviously separated my thinking from that of the republicans had become blurred. Up until then I had been anxiously turning on the news hoping not to see abad story about my candidate while rejoicing whenever the other democrat did something dumb, not realizing that my own emotion-driven thinking was the truemechanism which was tearing the party apart and guaranteeing a Republican victory in November.

As it stands, its my opinion that as of now John Mc.Cain has a very good chance to win in November. The democrats have become fractured along race, gender,age, income level, and type of living area. To simply be optimistic and use the line of thinking that the party will automatically come together in Novemberwhile continuing to bludgeon one another is not a good idea. To consolidate the party I believe both Obama and Hillary need one another but that after both ofthem have pointed out the weaknesses of the other this has become impossible and the idea of a dream ticket has become a faded memory. Because of the unlikelychance that they will be on the same ticket that makes it even more imperative that democrats coalesce around the nominee even if it isn't their firstchoice. Rooting against a fellow democrat and bringing up stories about Bosnia and Wright and deciding to switch parties or skip the election not onlywon't help us but it won't help the country. To me it seems as if people are less concerned with getting a democrat put in office than putting the"rockstar" or the woman who's "turn" it is put in office.

All of Obama's supporters and all of Hillary's supporters agree on 2 things. They are the issues and that a republican does not need to be put inoffice for another term. So before making a dumb decision and saying dumb things, take a step back and think. Don't let your emotions get the best of you.Don't be spiteful just so you can feel better for a month or 2 before John Mc.Cain wins. Use your heads@*!# and think through your decisions. You might notlike everything about the other democratic candidate but either of them is better than John.Mc.Cain so start rooting for all the democrats as a party and tryto root for both of their strong candidates instead of just rooting for one person.






The End
tired.gif
 
I heard this on the radio the other day....

it's all about 2012.
Hilary is bloodying up Obama so he'll lose in Nov and McCain wins. Then in 2012 she'll run again.

don't think that's the case...but I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.
 
Yea I really don't want to think that about Hillary but if it was true I wouldn't be surprised.
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

I heard this on the radio the other day....

it's all about 2012.
Hilary is bloodying up Obama so he'll lose in Nov and McCain wins. Then in 2012 she'll run again.

don't think that's the case...but I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.

I would not put it past that slimy woman and her entourage to do such a thing. She wants to be President by any meansnecessary, even if that means bringing down the Democratic Party in the process. Too bad Obama is going to be the Democratic nominee.
 
Selfishness. smh!

Now that I'm almost at a voters age everything seems much more in dismay than I realized.
 
Obama needs to win a big state... and he can't so I don't see why everyone says she is being selfish. He ain't hit the magic number of delegatesyet, so Hillary can do what she wants.
 
if I had a vote and it somehow magically was between clinton and mccain, i'd suck it up and vote for clinton even though i despise her as a person. at thevery least she would get us out of this war.
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

I heard this on the radio the other day....

it's all about 2012.
Hilary is bloodying up Obama so he'll lose in Nov and McCain wins. Then in 2012 she'll run again.

don't think that's the case...but I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.

smartest thing youve said in a while, in terms of your political views
 
You really believe a large number of Democrats would vote for McCain? Many of his policies are complete opposite of what Hillary or Obama, who are close tosimilar, want to do. I'm voting Democrat personally, don't matter which, but I don't like anything about McCain. I actually liked Huckabee and JohnEwards a decent bit.

But you mention Fox News, and the other similar stations, it seems like Republicans might win every election from now til the end of time if Dem'sdon't create an equally biased station full of propogandists pontificating, spinning, and muddying up and manipulating truth and their own opinion,masquerading them as one and the same.

I mean I think it's stupid and relatively irrelevant, but since Obama caught so much flack for it, I'm still mad nobody has made any mention ofMcCain's pastors and their comments.
 
I think most democrats will vote for either of them in November I'm just unsure of how many won't. I think come November the Democrats as a party needto stop being soft and really call Mc.Cain out on his flip-flopping and his policies which are opposite to what most Americans want and really be successful atmaking a connection between him and Bush. Recently a harsh ad came out in NC and Mc.Cain played the role of the mature, repspectful republican by denouncing itmeanwhile getting the other members of the party to do the dirty work for him. That's what the dems will have to do in November, especially if Obama is thenominee. While he stays above the fray and pushes Change, let the other top-tier democrats try to destroy Mc.Cain.

I think the difference between 3 percent of dems defecting or staying home and 10 percent doing so lies in how well the dems attack Mc.Cain. They need to bluntthe attraction Republicans have usually provided for low-income blue-collar workers and successfully remind them not to make the same error in judgment thatthey did in electing Bush.

Edit- Lol I heard Ron Paul has an ad out attacking Mc.cain.
 
Originally Posted by Toy Collector123

Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

I heard this on the radio the other day....

it's all about 2012.
Hilary is bloodying up Obama so he'll lose in Nov and McCain wins. Then in 2012 she'll run again.

don't think that's the case...but I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.

smartest thing youve said in a while, in terms of your political views
Why? Because you're a democrat & Dirty is a republican (seems like it) so you disagree.... making it not "smart"
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
indifferent.gif
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

I heard this on the radio the other day....

it's all about 2012.
Hilary is bloodying up Obama so he'll lose in Nov and McCain wins. Then in 2012 she'll run again.

don't think that's the case...but I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.

Seriously, I dont understand this woman, every speech she says he's not ready to be a candidate, then you hint towards possibly having him on yourticket. What if Obama wins the nomination, then she's basically just spent a year tearing down her parties candidate. I've never wanted to punch awoman in my life except for Hillary Rodham
 
i see it like this, whoever is in office will cater to the people for the first year, and then after that the spoils go to the lobbyists. return on investment
 
ron paul will never be president unfortunately. I feel hes the only candidate truly for America and not his own agenda.
 
btw....
Originally Posted by Toy Collector123

Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

I heard this on the radio the other day....

it's all about 2012.
Hilary is bloodying up Obama so he'll lose in Nov and McCain wins. Then in 2012 she'll run again.

don't think that's the case...but I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.

smartest thing youve said in a while, in terms of your political views
that doesn't mean much coming from someone who needs to come to NT for girl advice
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.

cmon, dude....obama is a product of the chicago political machine. the MOST corrupt political organization in the country.
 
Originally Posted by DatZNasty

But you mention Fox News, and the other similar stations, it seems like Republicans might win every election from now til the end of time if Dem's don't create an equally biased station full of propogandists pontificating, spinning, and muddying up and manipulating truth and their own opinion, masquerading them as one and the same.

what, you dont get msnbc?
Originally Posted by DatZNasty

I mean I think it's stupid and relatively irrelevant, but since Obama caught so much flack for it, I'm still mad nobody has made any mention of McCain's pastors and their comments.

hagee isnt mccains self-admitted mentor or pastor, nor is mccain a lifetime member of his church. if you arent able to sort out the differences between thetwo situations, there isnt anything i can do for you. hagee is an embarrassing endorsement mccain publicly dismisses, much like obama and the black panthers. on the other hand, obama would have us believe he, and is family, sat in the pews for twenty years but never inhaled.
 
Originally Posted by SchruteFarms

if I had a vote and it somehow magically was between clinton and mccain, i'd suck it up and vote for clinton even though i despise her as a person. at the very least she would get us out of this war.

i was in the same boat, but with the politricks she's pulled out in the pass months my conscience won't let me, I'd be throwing away myvote...but I'd have to mark Nader.
 
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

btw....
Originally Posted by Toy Collector123

Originally Posted by Dirtylicious

I heard this on the radio the other day....

it's all about 2012.
Hilary is bloodying up Obama so he'll lose in Nov and McCain wins. Then in 2012 she'll run again.

don't think that's the case...but I wouldn't put it past her... the Clinton machine is ridic.

smartest thing youve said in a while, in terms of your political views
that doesn't mean much coming from someone who needs to come to NT for girl advice
roll.gif


oh and dirty, do you say "ridic" because you can't spell it without pulling up a dictionary? (not trying to bash, because i think im gonna startdoing that too
laugh.gif
)

but anyways, who are you pulling for? Barack?
 
Originally Posted by roback1991

I think it's cute that people support Ron Paul.
laugh.gif
i know. it's like he's a figure of worship to some people. but those people are a very small minority
laugh.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom