- 3,937
- 2,069
Repped for the trademark
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm reading what you're saying and it's not making sense.Jesus Christ what the **** are you talking about? You haven't read one sentence correctly.
Just never mind, Rey = Luke's daughter so you won't be confused. ****.
Are you talking to me ...
of course not.
Zik has confused himself with every post.
Who takes Rey away? Why aren't they taking her to Leia or Han? Why doesn't Ben just take his sister right there and then?
Either way, what I said before still stands: If Leia doesn't know her daughter is alive then her hugging Rey first doesn't matter or mean anything. Maybe Leia just didn't want Chewy's wet fur on her right away after all of his crying.
Well I didn't know about thatDid they market him as BEING a Jedi. Or did they just show him holding a lightsaber? I never saw anything that flat out implyied he was an actual Jedi.From what I understand about those complaints it was marketing that fooled some ppl. They portrayed the black actor as a Jedi and as the main character in a lot of the promo and commercials. The rest was fighting in the air and nostalgia of Han and Chewy.
People made assumption and hurt their own feelings as far as Im concerned. Like that dude that committed suicide when he found out there would be a black Jedi protagonist.
I dont feel sorry for that idiot just like Im not really buying this outrage from the "bait and switch"
Well I could stop you right there. Nobody gives a **** about green ppl or green aliens. Let Piccolo and those other green ************* post their outrage.I agree. Its a sensitive subject. But what about Jabba The Hut's slave girl that he fed to the Rancor like a doggie snack. Sure, she was green
If she was a black chick or Native American chick painted green, maybe.but if you reach enough one could make the case that it is another example of racism on film.
Sure but that doesn't mean we should start ignoring the obvious racist stuffPoint is, if you look hard enough there is ALWAYS something that someone can say is "racist" and be genuinely outraged about it.
Well this complaint depends solely on who you are talking to. This blanket generalization that we got ppl outraged about a movie but not about stuff going on with the world today won't fly with most ppl. A person can be outraged about both.Outraged about a movie but then completely ignore the current slave mentality that plagues our people everyday. In todays world.
Well we aint living in that world b. History isn't just gonna be forgotten, racism and the plethora of ways it's been used and seeped in to all levels of society aint gonna just vanish and our memories of it as well.I say we should stop being outraged about things we can never change( like the fact that we WERE slaves) and start being (more) outraged about the things we can change.
That's all I was saying.
too much sand on that planet, he hates sandMan too much had happened to Vader on that planet, he was not going back.
too much sand on that planet, he hates sandMan too much had happened to Vader on that planet, he was not going back.
in one of the trailers when han says "its all true, the force, the jedi, all of it"Did they market him as BEING a Jedi. Or did they just show him holding a lightsaber? I never saw anything that flat out implyied he was an actual Jedi.From what I understand about those complaints it was marketing that fooled some ppl. They portrayed the black actor as a Jedi and as the main character in a lot of the promo and commercials. The rest was fighting in the air and nostalgia of Han and Chewy.
People made assumption and hurt their own feelings as far as Im concerned. Like that dude that committed suicide when he found out there would be a black Jedi protagonist.
I dont feel sorry for that idiot just like Im not really buying this outrage from the "bait and switch"
but leia is the top position at the resistance, she should have more security than anyone in the galaxy
it would be like obama giving his daughter a new identity and making her grow up in Bali rather than just keeping her close and trusting the white house security
literally right after her son turned evil and she regrets not keeping him close
She also commands an army of people with caretakers and medics on staff.
Leia IS as prime of a target you can get, if the first order is america then Leia is Bin Ladin. It makes no sense for them to send her off to a random desert where she could die from falling into quicksand and they would never know.
Luke has no way of taking care of her himself since he's having some alone time, the mom is probably dead, so it makes sense for his character and what we already know about his character to drop rey off as a kid.
the luke is rey's dad backstory takes 2 lines to explain and the audience would understand character motivations.
I knew I didn't misread this.I'm reading what you're saying and it's not making sense.Jesus Christ what the **** are you talking about? You haven't read one sentence correctly.
Just never mind, Rey = Luke's daughter so you won't be confused. ****.
Are you talking to me ...
of course not.
Zik has confused himself with every post.
Who takes Rey away? Why aren't they taking her to Leia or Han? Why doesn't Ben just take his sister right there and then?
Either way, what I said before still stands: If Leia doesn't know her daughter is alive then her hugging Rey first doesn't matter or mean anything. Maybe Leia just didn't want Chewy's wet fur on her right away after all of his crying.
Read this slowly.....
Han/Leia know she could be prime target.
Again, why can't Leia or Han do this?They take her to a family at age 2-3 to protect her from ANY threat. Snoke, FO, some other threat we haven't met yet.
This is literally a tv drama's hr worth of material Maybe 2.THAT family changes her name to help conceal her identity. THAT family comes under fire later, doesn't even have to be about Rey. Maybe they owe money to the mob, pick a reason. Make something up.
They are who Rey "thinks" is her family.
Han/Leia find out. They assume Rey has been killed with the family. They grieve.
Damn, I guess they weren't good at protecting themselvesThat family is killed.
I grasped this all from the jump. Perhaps you weren't understanding the questions I was asking?Meanwhile, Rey is on Jakku, alive, the entire time. But reported as dead. No one knows. Not her, not Han, not Leia, not Luke, not Snoke, no one.
If you don't freaking grasp this this time, I'm blocking you.
why do you think it's not luke's kid?Where Leia goes, or where the White House is, makes a child a stationary target.but leia is the top position at the resistance, she should have more security than anyone in the galaxy
it would be like obama giving his daughter a new identity and making her grow up in Bali rather than just keeping her close and trusting the white house security
literally right after her son turned evil and she regrets not keeping him close
She also commands an army of people with caretakers and medics on staff.
Leia IS as prime of a target you can get, if the first order is america then Leia is Bin Ladin. It makes no sense for them to send her off to a random desert where she could die from falling into quicksand and they would never know.
Luke has no way of taking care of her himself since he's having some alone time, the mom is probably dead, so it makes sense for his character and what we already know about his character to drop rey off as a kid.
the luke is rey's dad backstory takes 2 lines to explain and the audience would understand character motivations.
Hide a child on any one of a billion planets, lot harder to find that child.
She could hide the child even before Ben turns. He could still be training with Luke.
Luke needs alone time makes sense, but not protecting the Generals daughter?
Like I have said, they've left it open so it can swing either way. She could be a Skywalker, she could be a Solo, she could be a Kenobi. Rian will explain the truth one way or another in Ep 8.
But I assure you, its been done before already. Leia/Han hid their children on a remote, secret base. It's been done. It could be done again. Easily. I'm an idiot and have already given an outline on how to do it. They'd just have to flesh it out better than I did. Simple.
I have it
59% chance she is a Solo
39% chance she is a Skywalker
2% chance she is a Kenobi
We'll see what Rian Johnson does.
why do you think it's not luke's kid?
but leia is the top position at the resistance, she should have more security than anyone in the galaxy
it would be like obama giving his daughter a new identity and making her grow up in Bali rather than just keeping her close and trusting the white house security
literally right after her son turned evil and she regrets not keeping him close
She also commands an army of people with caretakers and medics on staff.
Leia IS as prime of a target you can get, if the first order is america then Leia is Bin Ladin. It makes no sense for them to send her off to a random desert where she could die from falling into quicksand and they would never know.
Luke has no way of taking care of her himself since he's having some alone time, the mom is probably dead, so it makes sense for his character and what we already know about his character to drop rey off as a kid.
the luke is rey's dad backstory takes 2 lines to explain and the audience would understand character motivations.
Where Leia goes, or where the White House is, makes a child a stationary target.
Hide a child on any one of a billion planets, lot harder to find that child.
She could hide the child even before Ben turns. He could still be training with Luke.
Luke needs alone time makes sense, but not protecting the Generals daughter?
Like I have said, they've left it open so it can swing either way. She could be a Skywalker, she could be a Solo, she could be a Kenobi. Rian will explain the truth one way or another in Ep 8.
But I assure you, its been done before already. Leia/Han hid their children on a remote, secret base. It's been done. It could be done again. Easily. I'm an idiot and have already given an outline on how to do it. They'd just have to flesh it out better than I did. Simple.
I have it
59% chance she is a Solo
39% chance she is a Skywalker
2% chance she is a Kenobi
We'll see what Rian Johnson does.
why do you think having her be han's kid makes for a better story?
As far as the slave parallels, yes I can see that. But slaves are a part of that universe.
Nobody was up in arms about Fett's clones being slaves, or all the other white slaves on other planets in the galaxy.
Nope. Just when we see ONE black character.
The whole looking for racism in everything rap is tired AF.
I'll be frank to start off, nobody gives a **** about white ppl being depicted as slaves in movies like that. That's just a fact.
When black ppl complain about similarities to slavery in media and portrayals that harken back to black ppl simple minded ******* who are oafs and goofballs you're gonna get an equal reaction and real outrage. Racism is still a sensitive topic and it isn't treated with kiddie gloves. That **** will be dragged out on front street in broad daylight.
It's not that slavery exists in the SW universe, it's that a sambo slave narrative like the runaway slave was applied to a black character.
So it's obvious as day why black ppl in the real world, would feel some type of way about ONE black character being portrayed in this manner in the movie.
This is not the extended universe. They take bits and pieces but other than that it makes the most sense both in star wars and as a screenplay to make the story as simple as possible.Because of the Jacen/Kylo parallel.why do you think it's not luke's kid?but leia is the top position at the resistance, she should have more security than anyone in the galaxy
it would be like obama giving his daughter a new identity and making her grow up in Bali rather than just keeping her close and trusting the white house security
literally right after her son turned evil and she regrets not keeping him close
She also commands an army of people with caretakers and medics on staff.
Leia IS as prime of a target you can get, if the first order is america then Leia is Bin Ladin. It makes no sense for them to send her off to a random desert where she could die from falling into quicksand and they would never know.
Luke has no way of taking care of her himself since he's having some alone time, the mom is probably dead, so it makes sense for his character and what we already know about his character to drop rey off as a kid.
the luke is rey's dad backstory takes 2 lines to explain and the audience would understand character motivations.
Where Leia goes, or where the White House is, makes a child a stationary target.
Hide a child on any one of a billion planets, lot harder to find that child.
She could hide the child even before Ben turns. He could still be training with Luke.
Luke needs alone time makes sense, but not protecting the Generals daughter?
Like I have said, they've left it open so it can swing either way. She could be a Skywalker, she could be a Solo, she could be a Kenobi. Rian will explain the truth one way or another in Ep 8.
But I assure you, its been done before already. Leia/Han hid their children on a remote, secret base. It's been done. It could be done again. Easily. I'm an idiot and have already given an outline on how to do it. They'd just have to flesh it out better than I did. Simple.
I have it
59% chance she is a Solo
39% chance she is a Skywalker
2% chance she is a Kenobi
We'll see what Rian Johnson does.
why do you think having her be han's kid makes for a better story?
Because Brother/Sister square off >>>> cousins squaring off.
Because of the Father you never had, trust me he woulda let you down, comment by Kylo.
Because JJ okie doked us with Finn not being a Jedi, and Rey was the one.
Or selling us that Phasma was gonna be bad ***, but she wasn't.
But he's just gonna lob this one up, on easy street? No misdirection on this one? Just straightforward he's your dad?
Naw.
Makes just as much sense for her to be a Solo as it does a Skywalker. And we already have the (scrapped) blueprint.
Rey = Jaina
Ben = Jacen
If it was soooooooooooo easy, slamdunk Luke is daddy, why didn't they flat out say it? Why stretch it into the second film? They kept it open for a reason. Finishing the layup is not great drama, I believe there's more to it.
We'll see what Rian does.
In Empire Strikes Back Han uses lukes lightsaberThe non force user using a light sabre did throw me off but for different reasons. Again, not a huge star wars guy but I always thought you had to have the force to even activate the sabre. I vaguely remember a character from a previous film trying and failing to use a light sabre because he didn't have the force. That close up shot of kylo pushing a little button to turn on his light sabre was hella lame to me
As far as the slave parallels, yes I can see that. But slaves are a part of that universe.
Nobody was up in arms about Fett's clones being slaves, or all the other white slaves on other planets in the galaxy.
Nope. Just when we see ONE black character.
The whole looking for racism in everything rap is tired AF.I'm not sure if people are understanding that the entertainment/media industry in America has ALWAYS been INCREDIBLY racist, explicit and deliberate brainwashing/mind control adolf hitler Nazi Germany type propaganda and that's no exaggeration. Nowadays it's just more subtle. So you have to excuse folks if they come across as suspicious or over sensitive. That said, I'm personally not upset over the finn character. I try to look at things in isolation for their own merit and I said earlier that if finn was white I wouldn't care so I'm not gonna trip because he's black. Slavery is not inherently a black thing but there were lines in the movie that indicated to me at least that finn was black or otherwise unique from others and not just some ambiguous character. The scene where they are acting confused about how he looks, not even sure if that works with a white actor in his place. "Droid please"....like c'monI'll be frank to start off, nobody gives a **** about white ppl being depicted as slaves in movies like that. That's just a fact.
When black ppl complain about similarities to slavery in media and portrayals that harken back to black ppl simple minded ******* who are oafs and goofballs you're gonna get an equal reaction and real outrage. Racism is still a sensitive topic and it isn't treated with kiddie gloves. That **** will be dragged out on front street in broad daylight.
It's not that slavery exists in the SW universe, it's that a sambo slave narrative like the runaway slave was applied to a black character.
So it's obvious as day why black ppl in the real world, would feel some type of way about ONE black character being portrayed in this manner in the movie.. Again I'm not tripping but you can't just dismiss it as reaching.