SUITS APPRECIATION VOL USA

Can anyone who is more knowledgable about law tell me why the corrupt general would even bother flying to testify against Ava? I'm pretty sure bribery is how business gets done in the country he is in and what would Cameron Dennis or Steve Huntley have that would make him get on a plane for a trial?
 
Can anyone who is more knowledgable about law tell me why the corrupt general would even bother flying to testify against Ava? I'm pretty sure bribery is how business gets done in the country he is in and what would Cameron Dennis or Steve Huntley have that would make him get on a plane for a trial?

I'm sure Cameron threatened dude in some way or he promised Ava's head on a silver platter. He's not the one on trial so he shouldn't feel threatened, and even if he was, he can't be tried in the U.S. since the crimes did not happen on this soil.

Harvey is a fool for actually telling Jessica. If u don't want it anymore, go to Darby and tell him so and also ask about Huntley, he dropped the ball on that one. After this episode, it looks like the knives will no longer be hidden behind backs but in the forefront and I can't wait. :lol

On another note, Luis in the beginning after seeing Harvey's name on the wall......tears, real tears
 
Can anyone who is more knowledgable about law tell me why the corrupt general would even bother flying to testify against Ava? I'm pretty sure bribery is how business gets done in the country he is in and what would Cameron Dennis or Steve Huntley have that would make him get on a plane for a trial?
Plea deal, say Ava is guilty in exchange of lesser sentence for carrying out the murder those people. This is the only thing i can think off unless Huntley had some dirt on the general. I think Huntley had a vested interest in having Ava being sent to jail, he tries to derail Harvey's case various times and wanted to Harvey to take the deal. If I had to take a wild guess and knowing Hessington oil was a Darby client, I say Huntley was involved somehow in the actual murder of those people.
 
So every time Harvey wins a big case the ritual is to smash Donna? :lol :smokin :evil

Where did you get that from?

Before they used to talk ****. After doing the act when both of them quit the DA's office, they changed it to strictly professional.

Harvey is a fool for actually telling Jessica. If u don't want it anymore, go to Darby and tell him so and also ask about Huntley, he dropped the ball on that one. After this episode, it looks like the knives will no longer be hidden behind backs but in the forefront and I can't wait. :lol

I think he did it, because he knew she would find out about it, so he felt it best come from him.

He didn't want there to be something Stephen or Darby could hold over him.
 
Last edited:
I think the problem with Harvey telling Jessia goes back to what she taught him, there is nothing wrong with making moves in the night, there is no moral code for them since they are attorneys, the problem is telling the people you making the move.
 
This case is getting stretched out way to long. Imo Harvey did nothing wrong in telling Jessica he made a move. And I don't seee why Jessica should be upset, besides its what she taught him. Plus she should've seeen it coming. But She's probably still salty because of all of the behind the back that's been going on between them lately.

Harvey and Donnnna did go back to being professional but then again there's some kinky ish going on with the can opener ritual lol
 
Yeah, I said that about the case a week or two ago. I like it better where they handle multiple cases over the course of the season. This case isn't that interesting to begin with. It's too many twist and turns and the characters aren't all that interesting.
 
Yeah they're taking this cat nonsense too far and it's taking up too much time. When the ep started I was shocked at how many minutes was being devoted to it.

It's clear they're padding for time with this Ava murder case that's been dragged out this whole season. The way I see it, writer's tried a different approach, a long form story arc instead of various story arcs with an underlying subplot developing throughout the season. If sidelining the season with subplot whose is a climax about a mock trial dealing with the rights of a cat the writers have failed. To me they could've done better with a Louis vs. Nigel subplot. It started off really good and had a lot of potential.

On another note :{ @ Katrina being sent away to Italy.
 
I kept thinking this was a dbz style filler episode until the last five minutes.

But I realize this was a way to realign the chess pieces, with Jessica, Harvey & co. on one side (with Louis) v. Darby, Stephen & Nigel.
 
I kept thinking this was a dbz style filler episode until the last five minutes.

But I realize this was a way to realign the chess pieces, with Jessica, Harvey & co. on one side (with Louis) v. Darby, Stephen & Nigel.
darby and nigel wont align with stephen. stephen was a fixer who used dirty tactics to get things done. yet another case of the number 1 (darby) not knowing what number 2 did. plus given Darby's history with hessington he wouldn't sign off on exposing Ava like that.
 
I will say that revelation caught me off guard. I didn't expect they'd make dude a murdering attorney. Playing rugby with African warlords :lol

That fight in the bathroom though :rollin :hat

Wonder what Darby will think when he finds out.
 
how this dude lose to a paralegal, though
the only difference between the lawyer and paralegal is a degree (which courses are mostly test prep for the bar exam) and that the lawyer can represent someone else. a good para can be just as effective as an attorney. 
 
a freakin cat?? louis was a decent character before.........real sharp and kinda evil. now hes lame AF

the show takes no risks the core cast is always making nice with each other.
 
how this dude lose to a paralegal, though
the only difference between the lawyer and paralegal is a degree (which courses are mostly test prep for the bar exam) and that the lawyer can represent someone else. a good para can be just as effective as an attorney. 


And Nigel's star witness was the office idiot.



a freakin cat?? louis was a decent character before.........real sharp and kinda evil. now hes lame AF

He's a great character but he's always been one of the lamest on TV...only difference is he isn't doing much legal work to balance it out.
 
Last edited:
Now that we know every player, how do you guys see the rest of the summer playing out and what do you guys want to see happen.
 
Hey Harold was not that stupid, he was brilliant in law school, thats how Mike was able to get him a better job. he just wasnt the right fit for how Litt is. Working for someone like Nigel would have made a world of difference for Harold. Dont knock Rachel she did a good job with her line of questioning, she was able to portray Litt as a caring likeable person and she was able turn around Harold who all the associates would have related to because of the way Litt treated them. Also keep in mind that Rachel is more highly regarded than the majority of the associates, she has her own office and probably has better paychecks that alot fo the associates.
 
the michael vick line had me
roll.gif
 
harvey being able to beat anyone up is not realistic. Especially a rugby brute who hangs with murderers. Litt would probably knock harvey down.

Is Columbia law school better than Yale's or was Rachel just happy that she can stay in NY?
 
Columbia is one of the top law schools in the country.

Plus it is in NYC where she wants to stay
 
Last edited:
I, too, thought the cat thing dragged on entirely too long.....up until the point where everything came together at the end.

I think you guys are missing a HUGE point in this cat thing.  While the premise of a cat custody battle was lame, it was a way to majorly advance the storyline.  The "cat mock trial" had two incredibly large payouts at the end......1) Rachel showing that she can in fact be a lawyer, and her getting into law school, and 2) Louis getting the associates back.

So while I am in total agreement with you that the cat storyline was stupid, it served its purpose by advancing the storyline a hell of a lot.
 
I never doubted Rachel could be a lawyer. She just sucked at taking tests.
a freakin cat?? louis was a decent character before.........real sharp and kinda evil. now hes lame AF

the show takes no risks the core cast is always making nice with each other.
The writers basically you gave you the reason for his lameness when he talked with Rachel. Thing is Mike ditching him, Harvey getting his name on the wall, getting pushed out of the Ava case on all fronts, losing the 1st years to Nigel, etc. haven't been shown to be that much of a negative impact on Louis. Son lost his edge, got no bite to his style anymore like he use to have.

Sure everybody has their low periods they shouldn't have focused so much on him if they were gonna make him look this bad. I think it'll be corny if they're waiting for the season finale for Louis to figure out Mike's secret to I guess make him another villain next season.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom