- 511
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2008
Originally Posted by s dubl
so they had a 13 in Spring Greens...didnt JTTL just drop an arm and a leg yesterday on a pair
AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by s dubl
so they had a 13 in Spring Greens...didnt JTTL just drop an arm and a leg yesterday on a pair
gooey ~ you'd be the founder for the team greedy bastid. ;-)
Yeah G, you should sell me those DW samples which are a tad too small for you
Cris - Nice shot of those Blood Clots
Steve - Finally!Funny on how you can make the same cw of those blk/white on ID but it just doesn't come out the same
Originally Posted by zyr12
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eB...erSize&item=170469665654
Does this look legit?
The gradient is completely off...Originally Posted by tak
Originally Posted by zyr12
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eB...erSize&item=170469665654
Does this look legit?
Absolutely NOT ..
I've only got retros (women's cw) and they are very comfortable. Never had the OGs, but I still can't imagine the retro cushioning being superior (don't know if that's ever been the case for any shoe). If anything, Nike usually tends to skimp on the amount of zoom in retros, at least in basketball shoes. With OGs, though, you're running the risk of aging degradation, not so much in the midsole but in the 3m and swoosh cracking/checking and the outsole detaching. Anybody with both care to comment (Justin or anybody?)Originally Posted by deuce02
and i need to find me some spiridons. i've always thought they were nice shoes, but never copped a pair.
i think i would prefer the retros since the zoom is probably much better. anyone have some input to this.
Originally Posted by gooeywooey
Seth - sorry to hear about the 96s. Another casualty in the pursuit of finding our fave old classics. I know it's happened and will happen again to me. All part of the 'fun' of the hunt I guess.