- Apr 22, 2012
- 85,159
- 114,217
The Official Flightposite 2014 Thread Vol. Carbons, H20, Possible Coppers
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by da shoefreak,
- Start date
- Jul 26, 2014
- 979
- 875
Copped one pair on NDC and tried to cancel after finding a pair at a local FootAction store with a birthday coupon. NDC rep tells me I cant cancel after 30 minutes of the order being placed. Now I gotta wait til it ships and return it while they hold my money! SMH
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,582
- 21,771
Been that way for forever now.
- Jun 18, 2001
- 5,019
- 2,820
They wouldnt let me add a discount code
- Nov 11, 2007
- 10,465
- 1,756
fall appropriate. id use my bday coupon but w ny tax that's still 2
KanyIZZY
formerly j o 19
- Oct 1, 2004
- 18,681
- 49,739
THIS PIC IS RIDICULOUSLY SICK… TOO BAD THEY PRACTICALLY KILLED FLIGHTS WITH THAT INNER MIDSOLE CRAP
- May 15, 2003
- 56,739
- 65,817
The on feet of these look good. Still passing though.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,212
- 40,122
Im assuming TTS?
- Jul 16, 2013
- 601
- 122
For me its tts
- May 6, 2014
- 6,550
- 1,131
what inner midsole thing Before you guys tear me to Niketalk peices this is my first ever pair of flights
- Jul 4, 2012
- 4,164
- 1,332
It's some minuscule irrelevant half inch piece of rubber that "sneakerheads" complain about to establish they are such sneaker connoisseurs that focus so intently on OG designs of classics. Smh. Literally means nothing to the overall design of the shoe.
- Mar 30, 2004
- 12,396
- 4,802
^ While it is a small part of the overall design of the shoe, it's definitely much more significant than you make it out to be. At least to most of the guys in this thread.
Not sure if this is a good (or valid) comparison, but look at the midsoles on GS Jordan 4s. If they decided to make men's sizes with that design, it'd cause an uproar. It's a relatively minor change, but it screws up the entire flow of the shoe.
This
Or this
Small piece of rubber, HUGE difference.
Not sure if this is a good (or valid) comparison, but look at the midsoles on GS Jordan 4s. If they decided to make men's sizes with that design, it'd cause an uproar. It's a relatively minor change, but it screws up the entire flow of the shoe.
This
Or this
Small piece of rubber, HUGE difference.
Last edited:
- May 19, 2014
- 639
- 343
While that little quarter of a circle missing from the inside does make them look off compared to previous years releases, it would not deter me from copping if caught on a good sale price!
- Jan 10, 2010
- 4,658
- 6,773
COPPED FOR $120. MY VERY FIRST PAIR OF FLIGHTPOSITES, THEY ARE QUITE COMFY. WASNT TOTALLY EXPECTING THEM TO BE AS COMFY AS THEY ARE.
View media item 1197923
View media item 1197923
- May 6, 2014
- 6,550
- 1,131
how the hell you get em for 120?
bigj505
Staff member
- Jan 23, 2007
- 42,582
- 21,771
Nike employee store
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,777
- 48,006
need the gold flightposites to retro again please....
- Nov 20, 2013
- 4,611
- 1,217
If that's what you have to tell yourself to justify paying so much for a garbage retro then so be it. More power to you young buck.
- Mar 11, 2013
- 11,177
- 1,537
these look nice
- Apr 13, 2013
- 2,599
- 801
I'd easily cop at $120, missing midsole or not. **** $220.
- May 24, 2008
- 4,164
- 1,070
- Jul 4, 2012
- 4,164
- 1,332
Fixed, Old guy.
- Nov 20, 2013
- 4,611
- 1,217
Lol old guy. I remember back in 99 when the OGs dropped for $160. Your living my past but with a cheaply made version at $220.
G-UNIT
G-UNIT
- Jul 4, 2012
- 4,164
- 1,332
You pay $220, not me Senior.
- Jan 10, 2010
- 4,658
- 6,773
FIXED.
I GOT A FEW GOOD PEOPLE I KNOW, THEY HIT ME UP SAYING THEY HAVE MY SIZE, TELL ME THE PRICE, I ASK NO QUESTIONS.
I DONT CARE WHERE THEY GOT EM FROM. THEY GOT MY SIZE SO I JUMP ON IT.
Last edited:
