I was speaking in regards to perception, which I think is what your post was about. Had he lost, he would be getting killed. Even if he dropped 40. If you win, you can shoot 30% and be called great. That's why rings should never be near the top of the of the list of reasons why you consider a player the best.
Players get more credit for playing poorly and winning than they do for playing great and losing. If they do their part, how can you blame them? If they don't do their part and win, how can you give them so much credit? Lebron had a bad shooting night but had an all-around great game.
Do you not agree that LeBron hd a better game than Kobe did in 2010? Maybe if Bron didn't have a triple double and a game-saving block I would agree but I don't think he played as poorly as Kobe did in that series.