- 33,587
- 28,895
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
Lawson's rookie year was better? Really? How am I overrating his rookie season when he's in ELITE company considering the #'s he has put up? Also, I think Derrick Rose/Rondo do a "decent" job of running their respective offenses despite (rose, not so much anymore) having their limitations shooting. That being said, I'm sure Wall will put in work this summer to improve his outside shooting. Also, if you're gonna get on Wall for his high # of TOs, then you have to do the same for Curry. I'm putting Wall over the both of them...easily.Originally Posted by Osh Kosh Bosh
Uh I like Wall and he's got great potential because of his athleticism but let's not overrate what he's shown this season. He can't shoot, and he can't shoot 3's and it's very difficult to run a good offense when your point can't shoot three's.
He also commits a million turnovers, combine these two things no matter how good his passing is murders offenses.
Curry and Lawsons rookie years were better than Wall's, and let me tell you Wall most likely will fix these things, but to me for that position, Curry has potential to be every bit as good, I just think the GS situation hasn't really allowed him to develop.
Curry turnovers have to do with the pace GS plays at, his turn over rate is lower than Wall's.
I just don't see how this rookie year where he shot, 40/29/ with like 5 TO a game puts him in elite company, I understand that his athletic gifts make his cieling really high but I don't think he's been better than Lawson or Curry was.
and given how impactfull shooting is from the point gaurd position I think Curry has the potential to be every bit as good as wall.