- Mar 31, 2011
- 72,985
- 117,227
The EXACT same.So basically the same thing that happened with Otto Porters and the WIZARDS?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The EXACT same.So basically the same thing that happened with Otto Porters and the WIZARDS?
I see where Swaggy P is coming from. A lot of these nerds run with these labels and get to decide what’s good basketball and what’s not. And I love analytics, but I was a hooper for so long that I definitely see where he coming from. A lot of politics
Never that I was amateur at best lol. I was just saying though, the NBA doesn’t really prioritize guys that are just good at ball no more. They would take a worse player with a longer wingspan over a guy averaging 20 ppg in a small conferenceOR you’re trying to prop yourself up against better/more complete basketball players
I didn’t actually mean YOUNever that I was amateur at best lol. I was just saying though, the NBA doesn’t really prioritize guys that are just good at ball no more. They would take a worse player with a longer wingspan over a guy averaging 20 ppg in a small conference
Lock in the money before you force a trade.
Right.Players like Nick Young have existed long before analytics were introduced to basketball. And they promptly got moved or benched when it was time to win.
Such a basic concept that eludes “bag” twitter & social mediaLike Nick Young is a better scorer than someone like Sam Hauser. But he needs the ball a lot to do it. And he doesn’t deserve the ball as much as Tatum or Brown if he’s on the court because he’s not as good as THEM at it.
Meanwhile someone like Hauser can space the floor, shoot at an extremely high level, doesn’t need to even dribble the ball, and can hold his own defensively.
He’s a more useful player than Swaggy despite not being the same kind of scorer. It’s not analytics. Just common sense.
has the hitch always been this visible?
Most Auraless NBA Champions Ever
Tatum couldn’t make a jumper and didn’t want to shoot them. Booker did all of those things you wanted Tatum to do.But what if the "scorer" could do all those things that the other player does, he just always has been the first option? For example Im sure Tatum could have did all the things Derrick White was doing for team USA if he put his mind to it. But White does not have the talent to do what Tatum can do. Hypothetically. Some guys in the league today they just box in too early I feel.