- Aug 4, 2012
- 32,039
- 14,854
Oh you thought that was opinion? They did. It was published.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh you thought that was opinion? They did. It was published.
Cavs in 6 if no randleSo fellas…
I’m intrigued to know who you guys have winning the Knicks vs Cavs series? And in how many games?
What are your thoughts on this particular series & matchups?
Don’t worry I’m not going to be upset if you guys say the Cavs - Just be honest and objective.
They got 2 curry's. Poole a mini flame thrower
teams would rather have other guys do the offense than Curry. I don't believe the Warriors would have been that dominant in the playoffs without Curry. of course, we would give credit to the role players, but that's exactly what they are....role players.They got 2 curry's. Poole a mini flame thrower
You don’t “need help” for saying lakers aren’t that great. They are 7th seed, 1-2 games outside of play in. They aren’t some juggernaut.Chill bro. Let them tell it I'm just hating and need help.
You're not sure how Quickley wins? He's been the favorite to win 6MOY for the past 20 games or so lol. It'll be close though I'm sure, and you can't go wrong with either. Brogdon more efficient, but IQ more impactful to his team than MB (which isn't a knock on MB, just moreso the Celtics are so much better) + more games played + memorable games, (albeit they pretty much came when he started(. One knock I think voters may hold against IQ is that he started too many games. If the award was just for how they performed based only on their bench stats, then MB runs away with it in a landslideBrogdon and Quickley basically have the same counting stats except Brogdon is more efficient and plays for the team with the 2nd best record in the league.
Not sure how Quickley wins that one. He’s been very good though.
Yeah, I can definitely see the games played/minutes angle for Brooks, who's been incredible. But I think JJJ is winning. Anchor of a better defensive team, stepped up huge when Adams went out, better defensive stats, doesn't have Giannis/Jrue, etc..Triple J played 15 less games than Lopez. If he was closer to 75 games then I would've given him the nod.
I think Brogdon was more consistent dating to the start of the season. And a lot of Quickley's big games were more when he started, which boosted his overall averages.
I actually think Harden has been a success. He faced some incredibly tough teams. I can say this despite thinking his Rockets style of play is horrendous.
I feel the same way about Luka. Unbelievably good.
What I have issue with is that for some reason Luka isn’t held to the same standard Harden was. Luka plays no defense, whines constantly, plays zero off ball offense etc. He has clear flaws. When he’s at this best he showed what he could do - get his team to a WCF. In the NBa the true greats though are able to still have a “good” season even when everything isn’t perfect. Too much discourse on how bad his team in and not enough on him individually.
One knock I think voters may hold against IQ is that he started too many games. If the award was just for how they performed based only on their bench stats, then MB runs away with it in a landslide
He peaked at 24?Media switching up on Luka fast. That’s what happens when you peak too early.
All they need is to batter #30 and they will be done for.
Naw, when you look past the side step three, what else does he offer you?Media switching up on Luka fast. That’s what happens when you peak too early.
Media switching up on Luka fast. That’s what happens when you peak too early.
Quite the duo of posters hereNaw, when you look past the side step three, what else does he offer you?
So the case for Quickley winning 6MOY, since his numbers are worse, is that he starts more games?You're not sure how Quickley wins? He's been the favorite to win 6MOY for the past 20 games or so lol. It'll be close though I'm sure, and you can't go wrong with either. Brogdon more efficient, but IQ more impactful to his team than MB (which isn't a knock on MB, just moreso the Celtics are so much better) + more games played + memorable games, (albeit they pretty much came when he started(. One knock I think voters may hold against IQ is that he started too many games. If the award was just for how they performed based only on their bench stats, then MB runs away with it in a landslide
Yeah, I can definitely see the games played/minutes angle for Brooks, who's been incredible. But I think JJJ is winning. Anchor of a better defensive team, stepped up huge when Adams went out, better defensive stats, doesn't have Giannis/Jrue, etc..
Lot of these awards are recency bias. MB slowing down + IQ's surge the past 20-30 games will hold ton of weight. Can't really knock a 6th man for having big games when he starts though IMO lol, that's what they should do
Ehhh I don’t agree with that.Feel like its gonna do a lot for black peoples financial literacy
one of the few awards that is a toss up where both are equally deserving and there should be no qualms either way.