- 33,608
- 28,911
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
if NBA players don't care about the history of the league, that's fine.
if they don't care about the future players who are harmed by less popular league, okay that's their choice.
if they are only narrowly concerned about their own salaries, and they want maximize that at the expense of any other consideration. okay, that's your choice.
but in what world do you get to do public antisocial things and face zero criticism?
it's feels like this weird Milton Friendman ideology come to basketball "a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders"
we live in a free country, you can do antisocial things for your own benefit.
but that will generally piss people off, it's actually a normal human reaction.
if they don't care about the future players who are harmed by less popular league, okay that's their choice.
if they are only narrowly concerned about their own salaries, and they want maximize that at the expense of any other consideration. okay, that's your choice.
but in what world do you get to do public antisocial things and face zero criticism?
it's feels like this weird Milton Friendman ideology come to basketball "a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders"
we live in a free country, you can do antisocial things for your own benefit.
but that will generally piss people off, it's actually a normal human reaction.