- Feb 24, 2016
- 12,114
- 12,759
So much fun
The Official Photography Thread - Vol. 3
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rap sizzle,
- Start date
So much fun
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,212
- 40,125
Can anyone recommend an EF Canon mount wide angle lens? 10-20mm or around there preferably. Budget id like to keep it around $500 or so...
Yeah im screwed arent I?
Yeah im screwed arent I?
- Nov 13, 2017
- 3,321
- 7,312
Tokina 11-16, I had the Canon 10-22 for a while and I honestly wished I had gone with the Tokina in the first place.
- Jan 29, 2013
- 471
- 448
Rokinon/Samyang 14mm (manual focus)
17-40 f4L used. $500-600 range typically
17-40 f4L used. $500-600 range typically
- Oct 8, 2007
- 13,077
- 7,285
I concur on that Tokina 11-14 f/2.8. The best thing is, you can find a used one for super cheap or a brand new one is like $400. It's a tank too and good glass for the price.
- Dec 5, 2009
- 3,540
- 1,870
Lens
My apologies for the confusion.
Haha, that was my guess anyways but I just wanted to make sure. Thanks again!
- Sep 6, 2006
- 1,667
- 797
untitled-08684 by eighty_8, on Flickr
- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,225
- 23,187
5DII w/100-400L will have to look at the exif data.
- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,225
- 23,187
- Sep 10, 2011
- 27,788
- 12,457
If you don't mind no AF go with Rokinon/Samyang
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,212
- 40,125
Dont know how confident id be with a manual focus, thinking about that Tokina but 11-16 kinda a small range no?
Went to London/Paris and that 50mm I normally use really limited me. New setup for travel (street/fashion) may be a 35mm and then a wide angle that im looking for now.
Went to London/Paris and that 50mm I normally use really limited me. New setup for travel (street/fashion) may be a 35mm and then a wide angle that im looking for now.
- May 7, 2015
- 1,312
- 1,124
Glad with the outcome here.
- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,225
- 23,187
That's cool and all, but I think you need to find better sceneries or subjects. This was also a longer exposure while being wide open which didnt render starburst, thus giving you ugly light circles. Instead you could of have shot this around f/11 or closer and the light would have been better. Just trying to help brother. If you dont want it, let me know and I won't critique anymore.Glad with the outcome here.
- May 7, 2015
- 1,312
- 1,124
Nah dude this is EXACTLY what I want. I need criticism only way I’ll get better.
- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,225
- 23,187
Since you're close to the Verrazano, try something like this for night photography.
I think this looks cooler and more interesting. In addition, see how the light has that burst effect? You have to close the lens, however, depending on lens you'll get different burst.
I think this looks cooler and more interesting. In addition, see how the light has that burst effect? You have to close the lens, however, depending on lens you'll get different burst.
- May 7, 2015
- 1,312
- 1,124
Since you're close to the Verrazano, try something like this for night photography.
I think this looks cooler and more interesting. In addition, see how the light has that burst effect? You have to close the lens, however, depending on lens you'll get different burst.
I’m trying to be able to take images like that dude. I’m just shooting whatever I can just to practice and hope to get better.
So shooting at a F11ish should help with that burst effect?
- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,225
- 23,187
No doubt, I'm not saying you are going to nail this, but who knows. What I'm saying is, since it seems you took that previous photo close to the Verrazano, why dont go to the Verrazano and do the same composition I posted. You'll need a steady tripod and a remote for the shutter release, since anything over 30 seconds will required one.
Make sure you look at your histogram and get the exposure right. You dont want to be way under and def nothing blown out unless is the light trails as you won't be able to bring it back in lightroom.
And continue to practice. But practice with interesting subjects.
- May 7, 2015
- 1,312
- 1,124
Will do I’ll get back to you personally
- Sep 10, 2011
- 27,788
- 12,457
Yes, a smaller aperture will give you that effect. In turn, you'll have to do a longer exposure.
- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,225
- 23,187
You dont have to ask me personally. Just post it here and ask for critiques. There are plenty of people here that are more than capable on giving you great feedback.
What camera and lens do you have?
- Sep 6, 2006
- 1,667
- 797
Since you're close to the Verrazano, try something like this for night photography.
I think this looks cooler and more interesting. In addition, see how the light has that burst effect? You have to close the lens, however, depending on lens you'll get different burst.
Damn I need to hit this spot
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,212
- 40,125
Looking at a used Tokina 11-16mm and slightly confused how its an EF mount but format capability is APS-C.
Arent EF mounts for full frane cameras?
Arent EF mounts for full frane cameras?
- Jun 15, 2013
- 26,225
- 23,187
EF mounts can be used for APS-C camera since those sensors are smaller than a FF. EF-S mount can only be used for APS-C since on a FF the mirror will slap the lens or you'll get heavy vignettes.
The reason why you see a lot if premium Lens for example Canon L on a rebel or xxD line.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,212
- 40,125
So this will fit my 6D?
https://www.keh.com/shop/tokina-11-...unt-lens-for-canon-aps-c-sensor-dslrs-77.html
https://www.keh.com/shop/tokina-11-...unt-lens-for-canon-aps-c-sensor-dslrs-77.html
- Nov 29, 2012
- 7,636
- 13,506
