- 13,073
- 7,279
The pancake would be a great walk around lens. The only ting s the bokeh is only so good at f/2.8 but it's super cheap and even sharp. You're not going to find a better lens than that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been trying to find an accuse to buy another camera (have no clue why) but the Sony A7 series just isn't quite there yet. I've even heard that entry level DSLRs like Rebels have a better focus system then them. That really is a horrible bench mark. So I really don't see why anyone would invest in a Sony unless they plan to use it like a range finder and just shoot full manual on everything and just try and focus that way. The Sony A6000 sounds even like the better choice but the lenses aren't plentiful and you have to add in the crop factor. I think their 35mm f/2.8 is their solid lens but I would want something wide and their wides lens is an f/4. Until there is a better lens that is out for the Sony system and even a better A7, I am just going to stick with Canon for now.
Anyone picking up the Zony 35mm 1.4?
That 10-18 looks awesome I might pick that up after the 50. Honestly just want a good bodeg lens for my sneaker shots and some outdoor portraits, is there any better option to start with than the 50 for that?
Anyone picking up the Zony 35mm 1.4?
was just reading/watching some reviews on this, seems to be another excellent performer it is quite large...#thatpricetho, the 28mm f2 is supposed be dropping soon, at a 3rd of the price
Yup. Just chilling on my counter in the box. I am going to get around to selling it within the month or so. I am going to lose mad money on it but whatever. I still got to clean it up. The sensor is pretty dirty. One thing I hated about the MK2. My sensor got so dirty and I use my MK3 about he same way and I have marginal issues with it. It could just be me though.
Yea I'm most likely ordering that 24mm, thanks for comments. Coming from the gh2 I definitely understand the crop factor as its crazy on that.
I did want the f/ 1.8 but I'll just have to save for a nicer lens
Majority yesthese landscape shots are shot with tripods right?
It's obvious these mirrorless cameras aren't made for sports shooters... So, sometimes having not so quick auto focus is a non-issue. Everyone has their cup of tea and prefer what they prefer. Mirrorless with not be as fast as DSLRs anytime soon and that's the tradeoff. You're always going to have a tradeoff. Will you sacrifice auto focus speeds for lightweight and portability without sacrificing image quality? Hell yeah. For sports and quick moving shots, definitely stick to DSLRs.
Mirrorless Tour de France Verdict
I set out with fair expectations for the A6000 at a professional sporting event. Based on my tests so far I knew it should be okay when the action was a bit slower on the uphill sections, but I had little idea how it would fair on the faster flats and downhills.
That it delivered hundreds of technically good images over five days astounded me. Here was an affordable mid-range camera that consistently captured the best road cyclists in the World in a huge variety of conditions, even when they were hurtling towards me at speeds in excess of 80kph. Now I understand that’s not as fast as track cycling, nor anywhere near the same league as motor racing, and for those situations I can’t yet say how performs as I’ve simply not had a chance to try it.
But the fact it performed so confidently in the conditions I tested it opens it up to a wide variety of sports and events. It should handle pretty much any athletics, ball or court games, and of course your kids running around at any age. The FE 70-200mm f4G OSS is a great lens to pair it with for fairly close range action and I’d recommend it to any owner of the A6000 wanting a high quality telephoto zoom that’s also future-proofed for full-frame.