What passive aggressiveness? There is no argument.
The quality and value of a game is subjective. We probably don't even play the same games. What's worth $60 to me may not be to you.
This launch window has been a lot better than previous ones. FTR, not every game I've bought has been $60. Some were PS+ games that I would of never bought or played like Resogun and Outlast. Or Mercenary Kings, which I already planned on buying. Or games on sale like LEGO Marvel for half retail. I think having 4-5 retail games and another 3-4 digital games is pretty decent for the first 7 months after launch.
Your last sentence from your previous post was passive aggressive.
The quality is subjective, however the value is not subjective(imo.)
Hence why particular games get price cuts before quality games that came out at the same time.
I offered an objective way to qualify which games are worth $60. I personally think that all CODs/sports games are worth $60, since people play them alot.
However those games' quality to me are lack luster.
I agree with the last sentence.