The 'Robert Horry' Argument: 'Stop it' (copyright: KLJ)
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by darthska,
- Start date
- 49,630
- 50,948
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2009
How is everything ska said not obvious tho? If its not obvious to any of you, you have some issues.
- 33,681
- 29,006
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
Rings are a team accomplishment, they don't really define my opinion at all on a player, but I am in the minority.
Like if Tim Duncan were to win two more rings in his diminished state, my opinion of him would remain the same, I know what Tim Duncan was at his best, everything else that happens is pretty irrelevant.
Like if Tim Duncan were to win two more rings in his diminished state, my opinion of him would remain the same, I know what Tim Duncan was at his best, everything else that happens is pretty irrelevant.
Last edited:
- 91,684
- 126,493
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
Repped.
- 1,981
- 163
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
Dudes need to stop using championship rings as the crutch of their arguments when comparing players altogether.
- 21,951
- 1,398
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2003
I thought people only brought this up jokingly.....
In the NBA it is a bigger deal than say the NFL, it will always be used.
In the NBA it is a bigger deal than say the NFL, it will always be used.
Last edited:
pabstblueribbon
Banned
- 1,137
- 172
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2013
Besides shaq carrying the lakers through those 3 peats Horry is the next reason they won.
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
dbl
Last edited:
As it should be avoided. It's a stupid *** trap question.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- 106,969
- 53,128
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
- 49,630
- 50,948
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2009
- 22,885
- 2,317
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2000
It is a variable in the equation. How much weight you put on that one particular variable is up to each individual
- 20,210
- 4,197
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
Yep just like Lebron was the only reason his teams didnt win the championship between 2009-11. He did the reverse 3 peat.....the choke peat
Lebron will always be the fake MJ and you know it. The ultimate frontrunner
Last edited:
- 42,182
- 43,968
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
Is this sarcasm?
- 20,210
- 4,197
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
Half and half
If Shaq was the reason why the Lakers won then by that simple logic, Lebron is the reason way his teams didnt win championships from 2009-11.
The other stuff, I dont really believe it, I was just using some Skip Bayless rants
Last edited:
jordan23dotcom
Banned
- 5,711
- 1,112
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2006
Rings don't define a player? LOL isn't that what all players play for? Isn't that why lebron jumped ship? Isn't that why Nash and Howard moved to LA? Isn't that why teams trade for better players? Isn't that why we watch the game?
- 884
- 169
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2012
Robert Horry may never get labeled as being a "great player", but he had some great games and shots while playing with the Rockets, Lakers and Spurs during the playoffs.
- 36,045
- 12,024
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
what are you smoking bro? him and magic are 1A 1B
- 15,661
- 4,793
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2008
Easily in the top 5 dumbest quotes in S&T history.
Speak of the devil...
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- 2,912
- 293
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2010
Like what I've asked in the other thread (a little off topic)... since basketball is a team sport should we be discussing the greatest team of all time or should it be the greatest player of all time?
Last edited:
- 29,630
- 1,863
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2003
Rings may not define a player but this super team choking against the mavs will always be on lebron and lebron alone.
When lebron loses- rings dont matter
When he chokes with a super team- rings dont matter
When he finally wins on a super team? - RINGZ YO!
When lebron loses- rings dont matter
When he chokes with a super team- rings dont matter
When he finally wins on a super team? - RINGZ YO!
- 40,141
- 11,080
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
