- 23,950
- 15,687
As long as the infrastructure is good in your city, it’s not worrisome. Most of the buildings in San Francisco are retrofitted to handle a big earthquake. The only area I wouldn’t want to be around is under scaffolding or near an old brick building.I know but if you live near any of those faults, and figure you’re gonna be alive over the next 30 years
If scientists say there’s a 7/10 chance something will happen before 2054
Doesn’t that scare anyone near there? Who knows where you’ll be standing. Apparently the mid-level office buildings are going to be the most prone to collapse over because seismic waves most match to that height of building in terms of toppling them. Towers should be good apparently because they are too modernly structured to topple, unless they are old/foundation is brick or concrete.
Thanks NOVA, I was already scared for people near the faults.
People do still talk about the 1989 one over here and everyone has a story of where they were at, but I noticed that the biggest issues they had with it was the power being out for a while, they had a hard time checking on loved ones, and getting through all of the mess on the street trying to get home.
I just think it doesn’t happen enough for it to be looming over our heads, but when it does happen, we probably won’t shut up about it.
But like I said earlier, 3.0 usually reminds people to get some emergency supplies because most news outlets will remind you that a 7.0 earthquake is 1,000,000 times stronger than a 3.0 earthquake. And 3.0 is enough to make dishes fall and sway a grown adult.