- Jul 24, 2012
- 629
- 447
The two are different, so it's difficult to compare them. But...I'm considering being in the market for one of these 2 watches soon. If not the speedster, than a seamaster.
I know the Speedmaster is comparable to a Daytona rather than the Sub, but whatevs.
How do you like the 2 in comparison? Which do you prefer or a more regular basis?
-The Speedy is manual wind so you gotta wind it daily. That can get annoying if you don't like winding.
-The Submariner ref 114060 is almost twice as expensive as the Speedmaster hesalite moonwatch
-Sub can take a lot more abuse...it's probably the most durable watch out there
-Sub will get attention, while Speedy will go unnoticed
-Subs movement is more accurate
-Lume for the sub is brighter...much more legible im dark compared to the speedy
-Both have good resale value
I prefer the Sub for a regular basis. Better water resistance, keeps time better, can take more damage
However, both are arguably the two most iconic timepieces with the most history in horology. Can't really go wrong with either...or both. But I sold the Speedy to eventually upgrade for the JLC deep sea.