i mean i dont like the date function either and would take it over a watch with one but i wouldnt pay extra for it, like the sub for example
and you cant really compare what one brand offers over the other then compare prices, thats simply not a fair comparison
come on now, patek vs seiko?
if this is going to be an argument here then i am simply gon’ tap out now
thats why i am comparing within omega, within the same line and they are milking because they know people will pay for it, i am absolutely not arguing that but me and plenty of others simply wont and it is not lost on me that its easier for me to say that because i wont be able to wear it as it stayed at 42mm
but its not limited to omega, piaget for example, been wanting a smaller polo however the 36mm polo cost more than the 42mm and its even crazier than the omega because its really just a shrunken version - zenith did the same with the defy skyline, they shrunk it to 36mm and removed the high beat sub dial (which was the watches/movements -the subdial moving fast as a novelty- selling point to begin with) and charged more, they have since changed the pricing and increased it on the bigger version but they were nuts they did it in t \he first place
and if you cant see the correlation between this watch and bond then i dont know what to tell you
thats like ignoring omega and their involvement with space/moon and how omega will never let you forget about it
thats as crazy as even mentioning seiko and patek in the same sentence
and of course its all subjective and all about personal preference, i am not arguing otherwise but we are discussing why “I” think they cost more by giving less and many view it the same way, i have been dying for a smaller SMP but if they charge me $1k more over the 42mm guise then its likely an easy pass for me (until i can get 30% off disco then id probably find it justified and get one
)
im no watch snob, i probably have the most quartz watches here that cost more than $100 so im also just a dude full of contradictions