darthska
Staff member
- 46,928
- 31,497
I think NO doubles on the stars is a stretch, but I'm sure you didn't mean that literally so there's no point in arguing the semantics there. I can totally see the other 2 points.No doubles at the best guys. Slow footed bigs galore. The defensive schemes were just basic. They’re so much more advanced today
So what if the contention was that it was less schematic but far more physical?