- May 10, 2018
- 3,574
- 3,996
Rony siekley woulda started on 60s celtics. Lol.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All the centers in the league aged out by Shaq’s “peak” except for Duncan. They saw the Spurs 4 straight years in the ‘00s and Kobe was the leading scorer every single time.
You’re envisioning 2000s Shaq killing Smits, Todd McCollugh and 34-year old Mutombo.
Cap has a claim to being the greatest of all time. Respect to Shaq but he’s on a lower tier any way you look at it.
Rony siekley woulda started on 60s celtics. Lol.
You bring up solid claims. However I'll say this about SAS and Pops-- I feel like Pops made it a point to try to stifle Shaq and him being the #1 objective (not an Earth shattering strategy but yeah) all while having the personnel to make it happenAll the centers in the league aged out by Shaq’s “peak” except for Duncan. They saw the Spurs 4 straight years in the ‘00s and Kobe was the leading scorer every single time.
You’re envisioning 2000s Shaq killing Smits, Todd McCollugh and 34-year old Mutombo.
Cap has a claim to being the greatest of all time. Respect to Shaq but he’s on a lower tier any way you look at it.
bob cousy was out there dribbling like Stanley from the office man I’m not rolling with anyone from that era in goat talk
It's 1 am and I'm slicing apples for a cake. Quarantine has officially taken my mind.
Eye am NOT comparing Stromile Swift to Bill Russell
Eye am saying that someone with that physical profile (same could be said of Wilt IMO)in that era, playing a different form of basketball, with all of the best players on his team, is toooo much of a leap to include him with guys of the semi modern / modern era of basketball.
In fact, the 11 rings thing alludes to this. It is inconceivable that a player playing anything close to a form of modern basketball could win 11 rings.
Cousy got tried for witchcraft once cause he dribbled with his left hand
Cap was damn near 40 when he saw Hakeem and got the same 27 a night, equal opportunity work to the whole Rockets frontline. You move Hakeem to his prime, shave a decade off KAJ and I don’t think the result would be too much different.I've heard this argument before, I actually use to believe it but as i've gotten older i think it's pretty silly.
2000 shaq is dominating any center in history save for Wilt Chamberlain and Bill Russell.
a non prime 22 year old Shaq put up 27, 12 and 6 on Hakeem,
Hakeem is easy money top 5 defender of all time. If Hakeem can't slow down a young Shaq
Who the hell is stoppin 2000 Shaq, who was even bigger, more skilled and a better passer.
Ive said this before, but take Ronny Seikley
poison him with led as a child,
have inhale mercury from terrible pre clean air act america pollution,
play in chuck taylors
from birth until it was time to play basketball and how good do you think he would do?
You can see it in the way for example Magic Johnson dribbled you can see he grew up with strict carrying rules, vs. Allen Iverson who grew up as the rules loosened.
Bro....you literally had to poison a player as a child and change the composition of the air he was breathing in order to make your comparison.That is worse logic than anything pulled out than anything used in the “MJ would average 40-45PPG in this era” discussion. Maybe that’s a sign it’s a comparison that shouldn’t be made
Bro....you literally had to poison a player as a child and change the composition of the air he was breathing in order to make your comparison.
of course no one would win 11 rings now there were only 8 teams in the league.
the rules were totally different, players didn't access to basketball training and skill development at young ages,
but to me this makes them more impressive not less,
it was league that where you had to rely on your natural athleticism and feel for the game and isn't that a truer test of your talent level?
like Stromile Swift had access to all this training, was able to watch way more basketball, absorb way more coaching, and he turned out as a low IQ energy big.
If I took him back to 1950's america,
stripped him off that knowledge,
gave him the child hood diet of a 1950's black america pre civil rights
and added in a dash of led poisoning,
how good of an NBA player do you think he would have been?
Magic is a whole 2 years older than zeke man and a year older than sleepy Floyd. They grew up with looser carrying rules?
I'm not even saying that you're necessarily wrong,
But what I am saying that the things you mentioned, the rules conditions, climate, the amount of teams in the league, are all all the reasons why projecting Russell into a modern game is a hurdle that seems to large to jump.
The game is so different, that anything aside from Russell's athleticism I can't even try to translate.
Everything you said about Russell may be right, but he didn't play basketball as we know it to be, in an 8 team league he hoarded all of the all stars, and while he was obviously elite during that time, I'm not taking anyone who wins 11 rings in the context that I just mentioned, seriously. 11 Rings, with all of the all stars on his teams, playing a sport that hardly resembles basketball? Yeah I have to pass.
You can make the argument that if he wasn't fed poison in his cereal that he would translate to this era, but he could just be DeAndre Jordan or Rudy Gobert. He didn't show much of an offensive arsenal in that era
In an 8 team league in which it didn't resemble modern basketball at all, everything aside from Russell's physical profile I take with a grain of salt if I take it out of the 60's context.
I get what both sides are saying but I think Bill Rusell would have been an all timer no matter the era. Of course its hard splitting hairs and comparing era's and all that.
I just think that the older era players should be given more respect at least being innovators. No one thought them how to shoot , dribble, defend yet they were ahead of the curve.