- 1,647
- 1,253
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
Am not surprised to see LA and SD high on the list.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Yeah military towns and those with all a large amount of folks moving there are probably the worst, you never know what you're gonna get.San Diego= mostly military from other states so that should be handed down to the south.
Yeah y'all deserve that number one spot if that going down
I have never heard of that occurring anywhere
If you look at the criteria they're using to classify "aggressive" driving, you quickly realize they're not great indicators of what true aggressive driving is. They're mostly looking at who's wasting the most gas and killing their brakes the most.NYC 23?!
NYC 23?!
list looks fishy cause drivers in austin are the opposite of agressive
they drive like so slow
http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/loc...-on-southfield-freeway-after-traffic-incident
Detroit should easily be #1, everybody around this ***** got built in road rage. Anytime I go OT I lose my mind, nobody can ****ing drive, especially the big cities with a lot of public transportation.
Not really. Sac drivers are horrible. Freeway system here sux. 2 million people and only 3 major highways. 4 lanes merging into 2 or 2 merging into 5. These city freeway planners must of been high.Sacramento drivers are a lot slower and passive than LA/SD..
Y’all mph on freeway slow. Thought it would be at least 65-70.NYC 23?!
Better indicators of "aggressive driving" would be road rage instances, tailgating, horn usage, resistance to incoming lane changes, strong-armed lane changes, "upstreamed" lane changes (using a lane that isn't busy to go ahead of a bunch of cars and then force yourself in the busy lane at the very last second), etc.
I survived driving in DR