- Mar 6, 2018
- 6,145
- 8,003
They created Jurnee Smollett so they get a pass.
This Jussie Smollett Situation is REALLY Bizarre...
They created Jurnee Smollett so they get a pass.
- Nov 18, 2007
- 28,107
- 9,249
This story really bums me out. I am a huge r&b head and loved his music. Gonna be hard to rock with this clown now.
- May 15, 2003
- 56,755
- 65,851
High character dude. P Kelly stuff, it wasn't me, it was my brother. Give a real fake name.
I see dude is a terrible liar.
The first day of school was painful for kid. Juicy Smullet, is Juicy Smullet here
- Oct 7, 2007
- 7,589
- 7,468
The dude been fraudin through life, least he could've done was fraud that name of his
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- Jun 27, 2002
- 34,023
- 81,492
- Jul 19, 2012
- 110
- 299
This Jussie Smollett dude is a clown and deserves everything coming to him for faking this story, but it’s bs for a lot of folks to push this narrative that “his lie will make it harder for real victims” when a lot of folks that say it don’t believe “victims” in the first place. Same folks that blame women or straight up don’t believe it when women come forward about rape, or blame an Eric garner or Mike brown when they’re killed by police. I get where folks are coming from with that, but it’s been rough on minorities long before this Jussie Smollett incident and it’s not like things were turning around right before it.
- Mar 13, 2008
- 3,129
- 2,746
"All Guyz On Me"
"Ambitionz az a Grindr"
"Ambitionz az a Grindr"
Last edited:
- Apr 5, 2017
- 22,188
- 63,106
Damn I ain't know they had another sister
aepps20
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,598
- 90,927
- Dec 25, 2012
- 4,565
- 3,049
Dude is screwed and he and his legal team know it. If they are smart they will have him immediately seek psychological help this way they can use that as an excuse. Some shady doctor getting paid by the legal team will diagnose him with some BS in an effort to explain why he did/does what he did. That is the only way he will receive any sympathy from the public.
Last edited:
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,519
- 44,508
Why is it taking so long to get concrete answers? So much, "sources say."
- Oct 8, 2017
- 1,558
- 1,211
Get help
- Mar 13, 2008
- 3,129
- 2,746
- Dec 25, 2012
- 4,565
- 3,049
Because law enforcement is concerned with being thorough and running down every lead until the end which takes time. Chicago PDs concern is the legal case not pleasing the public by releasing information that if not properly vetted which could be incorrect thus potentially causing the CPD to lose credibility.
Loss of credibility could jeopardize the entire case and give those naysayers a good argument as to why Jussie is telling the truth.
Last edited:
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,519
- 44,508
Of all the cases to be thorough with, tho.
- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,737
- 106,445
It is a very, very public case, so really they have to.
Only a matter of time before the Pres tweets about it with fox news talking points if he hasn't already.
Only a matter of time before the Pres tweets about it with fox news talking points if he hasn't already.
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,978
- 61,852
Give it up fam. Everything surrounding Jussie in this situation is fugazi
- Dec 25, 2012
- 4,565
- 3,049
Especially this case due to all the media attention. Plus time is on CPDs side because Jussie isn’t under arrest so they can take there time. If he was in custody they’d have a limited amount of time to present the case to the DA before having to either prosecute or release him.
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,519
- 44,508
If it was THAT fugazi, it would be over now, wouldn't it? It only took NT a couple of seconds to figure out it was fake. Whats CPD's problem?
- Jan 11, 2013
- 18,115
- 11,770
whats thorough about saying youll arrest dude before the initial investigation is over?
that was like 3 weeks ago, they came out and said they think hes lying but still no arrest
just beggin him to come to talk to them
what part of this is thorough?
they should have just kept quiet on arresting him until they were ready to do it
that put cpd in a bad light imo
that was like 3 weeks ago, they came out and said they think hes lying but still no arrest
just beggin him to come to talk to them
what part of this is thorough?
they should have just kept quiet on arresting him until they were ready to do it
that put cpd in a bad light imo
- Oct 8, 2002
- 42,519
- 44,508
I kinda feel like if it wasn't for the media attention, CPD would've just 'filed' this case and kept it moving.
- May 15, 2003
- 56,755
- 65,851
Yeah, forget LaQuan McDonald, GayPac put them in a bad light.
So now dudes are trying to turn this in to a debate about the police and what they did wrong
Do you think we know what the police know or just enough to let everyone know he's full of it. Like they're going to give the news all the info they have.
So now dudes are trying to turn this in to a debate about the police and what they did wrong
Do you think we know what the police know or just enough to let everyone know he's full of it. Like they're going to give the news all the info they have.
- Dec 25, 2012
- 4,565
- 3,049
No need to arrest him because Jussie isn’t going anywhere (flight risk). Like I mentioned earlier, once CPD arrest him they only a few days to present the case to the district attorney (DA). They (DA) will either decide to prosecute or drop the charge and if they drop the charges Jussie goes free until they build a better case. Think of how bad that looks if they (DA) decline charges because they have a weak case but then CPD continues to investigate and ends up filling a case again. To the public it will look as if CPD is targeting him.
With him free they can take their time and run down all leads before putting a case together to present to the DA.
Last edited:
- Jan 11, 2013
- 18,115
- 11,770
Yeah, forget LaQuan McDonald, GayPac put them in a bad light.
So now dudes are trying to turn this in to a debate about the police and what they did wrong
Do you think we know what the police know or just enough to let everyone know he's full of it. Like they're going to give the news all the info they have.
im talking specifically about how they handled this case
when other ppl bring up mcdonald etc its always that has nothing to do with this case right?
im not saying they have to put out all their info, im saying until they completed their investigation they shouldnt have said anything
i get that, but with how early they knew to come out and announce they may arrest him how does it take so long?
like i said 3 weeks ago they said if he staged it they would arrest him
im saying they should have kept quiet if that was their intention until they were ready to it
announcing it early and not doing it immediately speaks to their mishandling of the case imo
- Jan 11, 2013
- 18,115
- 11,770
