i've had the black ice and the micro g lite and been very happy with both. I wish the jukes allowed you to remove the sleeve as I don't like the restrictiveness of ankle braces, so I guess i will probably just grab some of the bloodlines when the all black ones come out.
so far these shoes have been nothing but good to me. they are in the price range i want ($100 and under), provide great, lasting quality and good durability (even outdoors). my favorite part is the micro g cushioning because its a full length cushioning system as opposed to nike and adidas who just use run of the mill EVA (whether injected or compression molded, who cares) and drop inserts of their tech systems into 40 year old technology.
from what i see, it seems like shoes in general are relying on gimmicks that they have dubbed "technology" such as flywire, zigtech, hyperfuse, lunarfoam, etc. adidas is a little bit different as they are more upfront with what they are doing, which is to just make the lightest shoe in each segment at all costs...including sacrificing stability, impact protection, durability, and whatever else. under armour seems to be the only company to be primarily performance driven rather than coming up with a marketing scheme and calling it new technology. under armour's shoes aren't the lightest out there and they aren't using any technology seemingly out of a cartoon or comic. they just make shoes that do what the users need them to do at a reasonable price.
