- 64
- 15
View media item 831292View media item 831293left
View media item 831299right
production dates don't match!!
View media item 831299right
production dates don't match!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First thing that popped out to me was the EP ... What you think about that? Especially the third picHonestly I never disagree with the trillest but I'm not liking the looks of these..
Couple things that jump out at me are.. the fat collars, the rear of the L Shoe looks lopsided, the box looks mad small IMO, the red eyelets are not seated correctly and the stitching around them is choppy at best..I'm still on the fence with these for right now..
yea that's some rep to lose for sure.. keep MM...we all know your the Trillest already.lol..My observation
- Double white contrast neatly starts/ends between the middle white eyelids as they should be
- Sock/ankle liners come to slight points/ridges on the heels (should be)
- Sock liners look slightly puffy due to wear, these aren't ds imo, maybe a couple wears out of them atleast
- Ep can vary in many different ways, my right shoes ep is almost slightly a quarter inch longer cut, theirs never gonna be an exact ep on both shoes from boldness, thickness & cut
- Fire red piping is nearly as good as it gets on the tumble leather tongues
Imo opinion these are a 100% authentic wc3's with slight jb maf errors!
timmybrixxx im been trying to change my sn to the trillest , but them i would lose my rep fam!