- 57,681
- 61,277
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2012
More than one interpretation of Peter exists.Gyllenhal is like 50 years old bruh
We don't need much of Peter, we need Spidey...
Garfield's interpretation of Peter was what bombed, not really because of his acting chops, as much as the way Pete was written...completely negated Petes underdog, weak, bullied, geeky personality.
Garfield's interpretation of Spidey was dead on and that's who we need in the avengers, his physical, mannerisms and sarcastic personality but still endearing...Garfield nailed that **** and I want anyone who disagrees to tell me how Garfield bombed as Spidey.
Garfield was a blend of 616 & Ultimate. Tobey was just Tobey. The Peter from like 60 years ago is outdated.
Last edited: