MVP
Supporter
- 82,951
- 85,385
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Let's assume no more SM in the MCU.
It's a big character obviously so does Marvel then add a new hero (wolverine/X-Men) sooner than they wanted?
They resurrect Iron man
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Let's assume no more SM in the MCU.
It's a big character obviously so does Marvel then add a new hero (wolverine/X-Men) sooner than they wanted?
This. Disney wants more money. Sony, who owns it says no.Public perception is real. Sony ain’t even the ones in the wrong here. It’s Disney
Public perception is real. Sony ain’t even the ones in the wrong here. It’s Disney
Let's assume no more SM in the MCU.
It's a big character obviously so does Marvel then add a new hero (wolverine/X-Men) sooner than they wanted?
YOU* didn't know. We were counting down the days to see spidey in this movie. We knew months beforeI know some think it’s too soon, but let’s remember that Amazing Spider-Man 2 came out in 2014. In 2016 (only 2 years later) a new Spider-Man was cast and debuted in CA:CW.
Logan came out in 2017. Obviously he won’t be in a MCU film this year, but it’s not completely out of the question that we see Wolverine much sooner than anticipated. Hell, we didn’t even know about Spider-Man in Civil War until the trailer dropped.
Cuz some ppl don't see it so black and white.I know this is the MCU thread, but i'm still confused as to why some of yall refuse to blame the real culprit in this mess: Disney. They've gotten too big for their own good.
^^^
Unless there was a gentleman's agreement that was discussed prior that Sony would give Disney around the ballpark of what they're asking for now, but backed out last minute after receiving more than the expected outcome, I personally wouldn't blame Sony solely them for this. If we're talking about 5% to 50%, I understand why Sony isn't budging because it doesn't have to. From a business standpoint, Sony would be getting punked for accepting that.
I don't get how ppl seriously thought a character owned by another company was really gonna be the center of the MCU going forward. That Spider-Man was literally gonna be the heir apparent to Tony Stark.Did you see the lineup for Phase 4? Marvel Studios ain't worried about not having Spider-Man.
This guy literally just named two billion dollar movie franchisesever heard of captain marvel and black panther?
Tom Holland unfollowed Sony on social media
But FFH practically set him up as the heir apparent lolI don't get how ppl seriously thought a character owned by another company was really gonna be the center of the MCU going forward. That Spider-Man was literally gonna be the heir apparent to Tony Stark.
That'd be like Marvel comics licensing James Bond, making him leader of the Avengers, marry She-Hulk, have a kid with Misty Knight, definitively kill Dr. Doom, all leading up to a huge marvel event just for the license to be pulled.
It's just stupid. Business wise and all others.
Disney had a pretty sweet deal until you figure that 5% front-end and merchandising is a fraction of what Sony pulled in on the back-end off of FFH...
He can't, that belongs to Tony aka the MCUWait! Is Peter taking E.D.I.T.H. with him??
Not I. I streamed that mug lol
Venom was alright
Better than what I thought it would be but def nothing on par with anything MCU
He and Carnage are just super popular and will do #s regardless lol
But apparently Sony is wrong for backing out lolspidey is the most licensed hero in the world and earns a billion plus a year and that was back in 2014: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/superhero-earns-13-billion-a-748281
plus part of the deal was that they could use Spidey in other MCU film (he has been in more Disney films than Sony films) so its not like marvel only reaped the benefits of just the 5% and billion $ on merch annually, spidey merch making disney way more money than sony is on their films since only one spidey film has made a billi and its probably safe to assume merch is always making the mouse a billi every year
its hard to quantify how much spidey brought in for cw, iw and eg but he was a big part of those and those movies wouldnt be the same without him so i think thats a bigger benefit than the 5%
also keep in mind, disney keeps the 100% merch $$$ even if they dont make a deal with sony so thats still a billi a year in their pockets no matter what and i dont think thats just on the spiderman character but the whole spider universe so venom, spiderverse, morbius, carnage, etc... merch are all disneys and according to this, sony has 900 spidey characters they can develop: https://www.inquisitr.com/5340323/m...er-marvel-characters-to-be-developed-by-sony/