- 704
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
2011 - Lebro... nevermind.
what superstars have won a chip with no other "all star" from that year
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by 2o6,
- Start date
- 704
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2007
2011 - Lebro... nevermind.
- 1,359
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
Jordan's last ring (I know for sure) & Duncan's first two (I think).
- 1,359
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
Jordan's last ring (I know for sure) & Duncan's first two (I think).
- 4,256
- 13
- Joined
- May 21, 2009
Some of you are talking out your rectums
- 4,256
- 13
- Joined
- May 21, 2009
Some of you are talking out your rectums
- 3,184
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
did u not see 3 other ppl correct me?
it was the same "core" regardless . i doubt anyone can make a case for ben wallace carrying 4 role players to the chip.
i should re-word it "Perennial All-Stars" <--more what im looking for
Jordan in 98'
hakeem 95'
duncan 03'
- 3,184
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2009
did u not see 3 other ppl correct me?
it was the same "core" regardless . i doubt anyone can make a case for ben wallace carrying 4 role players to the chip.
i should re-word it "Perennial All-Stars" <--more what im looking for
Jordan in 98'
hakeem 95'
duncan 03'
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
No they didn't. Two years after they won it, they had four all-stars.
Anyway, the Ben Wallace example shows how stupid it is to praise a player for having won a championship because he technically didn't have an all-star. Just because someone didn't technically have an all-star on his team doesn't mean it wasn't a great team.
Another great example is Jordan's first championship. Technically, Michael Jordan won his first 91 championship without an all-star. For whatever reason, Scottie Pippen didn't make it that particular year. He was an all-star the previous year in 1990, even though he was significantly better in 1991. Pippen's 1991 playoff run is the best playoff run of his career. The digits:
21.6 ppg on .504
8.9 rpg
5.8 apg
2.47 spg
1.12 bpg
over 17 playoff games. Yet he wasn't an all-star that year.
But I know what this thread is about and I'll say that Hakeem's 94 championship is the closest one to a player winning it all by himself, especially considering the teams he met in the playoffs. And it's really not a great time to make this thread after Terry bailed Dirk out last night.
xtapolapacetl
Banned
- 6,841
- 126
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2006
No they didn't. Two years after they won it, they had four all-stars.
Anyway, the Ben Wallace example shows how stupid it is to praise a player for having won a championship because he technically didn't have an all-star. Just because someone didn't technically have an all-star on his team doesn't mean it wasn't a great team.
Another great example is Jordan's first championship. Technically, Michael Jordan won his first 91 championship without an all-star. For whatever reason, Scottie Pippen didn't make it that particular year. He was an all-star the previous year in 1990, even though he was significantly better in 1991. Pippen's 1991 playoff run is the best playoff run of his career. The digits:
21.6 ppg on .504
8.9 rpg
5.8 apg
2.47 spg
1.12 bpg
over 17 playoff games. Yet he wasn't an all-star that year.
But I know what this thread is about and I'll say that Hakeem's 94 championship is the closest one to a player winning it all by himself, especially considering the teams he met in the playoffs. And it's really not a great time to make this thread after Terry bailed Dirk out last night.
- 4,591
- 1,821
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- 4,591
- 1,821
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2004
- 53,289
- 20,855
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
They need to focus on reading and reading comprehension more in schools.
- 53,289
- 20,855
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
They need to focus on reading and reading comprehension more in schools.
hella handsome
Banned
- 6,600
- 15
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
Yeah, but I'm saying, Jordan technically didn't have two "all star" team mates that year due to them not being in the all star weekend, but they were HOF Superstar level players.Originally Posted by JJA89
Well Jordan was the only bulls rep at the asg that year
Which is why I don't believe Jordan counts.
But hey, maybe I didn't fully process the question, due to the late night surfing. I should have been sleep anyways.
hella handsome
Banned
- 6,600
- 15
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2007
Yeah, but I'm saying, Jordan technically didn't have two "all star" team mates that year due to them not being in the all star weekend, but they were HOF Superstar level players.Originally Posted by JJA89
Well Jordan was the only bulls rep at the asg that year
Which is why I don't believe Jordan counts.
But hey, maybe I didn't fully process the question, due to the late night surfing. I should have been sleep anyways.
- 32,560
- 27,086
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
I've looked through NBA history the answer is Hakeem, Duncan, Walton and now Dirk.
You could say Magic that year he one with a 42 year old Kareem, but to mee this is more proof that C>any OTHER POSITION.
You could say Magic that year he one with a 42 year old Kareem, but to mee this is more proof that C>any OTHER POSITION.
- 32,560
- 27,086
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2006
I've looked through NBA history the answer is Hakeem, Duncan, Walton and now Dirk.
You could say Magic that year he one with a 42 year old Kareem, but to mee this is more proof that C>any OTHER POSITION.
You could say Magic that year he one with a 42 year old Kareem, but to mee this is more proof that C>any OTHER POSITION.
- 2,526
- 243
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
Dream in '94. He carried that City to a chip
- 2,526
- 243
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
Dream in '94. He carried that City to a chip
- 1,211
- 10
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
This.
- 1,211
- 10
- Joined
- May 2, 2011
This.
- 4,020
- 608
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
so just basketball?
- 4,020
- 608
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
so just basketball?
ham city
Banned
- 10,116
- 202
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2009
Similar threads
