4dWritePRiCE wrote:
Originally Posted by
SShanique
Originally Posted by
4dWritePRiCE
Originally Posted by
SShanique
Originally Posted by
Shaze804
Originally Posted by
Me4u2Night
Originally Posted by SShanique
Why is anyone mad at me for wanting to be with someone who could be my equivalent? Are y'all trying to make me out to be a golddigger or something? When he told me he was 25, I perked up. On the flip side, when I told him I was graduating law school in two months, he perked up. I don't see what the big deal is. I never even accepted a date from him. I was more concerned with my classes, and I felt he could wait. How does that make me a golddigger?
at this entire thread.
SShanique always manages to get her self into trouble
I'm sure your responses were innocent, but this is how we see it.
Even though you're on the verge of becoming an attorney, you're not quite his equivalent.
Do you have a House? Car? Restaurant? Probably not.
And I'm sure he perked up because he saw it as someone who could possibly be HIS EQUIVALENT.
But until you get the 120-150K salary you are not his equivalent.
[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/font]
false sense of entitlement. this is 1 of the things that irked me about that ABC news special "why blk women are unmarried"(besides the lackluster reporting)
...can't find someone their equivalent? for yrs it was the other way around meaning men were marrying down...now more women are breadwinners why is there a issue with marrying someone with lower income than yourself...but thats another topic i guess.
Men get to choose women based on looks, but women don't get tochoose men based on status.Gotcha.
that's exactly right. Traits are what defines people [personality traits or physical traits], and dictate attraction. LOOKS consist of physical traits which directly have to do with who the person is, and therefore is a factor in attraction. STATUS is an indicator of income, therefore hinting at the amount of materialistic objects one can acquire by getting with that person. status isn't a TRAIT, and therefore has no grounds for causing attraction.....unless, that is, that you're in fact mining for GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLD; in which case i suggest u cop one of these.
No, a person who is successful has to have had thegoals, drive, and ambition to reach that success. I think those are some very nice traits to look for in a partner.
well u didnt say it was the goals, drive and ambition. u said
" but women don't get tochoose men based on status.Gotcha. "
jus sayin
I certainlywould not date a guy based on status, alone. A drug lord could have a high status, and that is not my type. I judge aguy by what it took for him to obtain that status. Essentially,it's TheClimb.
I mean, this guy does not just run the restaurant and tell people what to do. He sometimes has to get his hands dirty. I know the 2nd time I went there to pick up an order, he came from the back wearing an apron. I wanted to laugh. I figured he was short on cooks and had to cook, himself. But maybe I made his day a little bit better, because he did the Ric Flair as soon as he saw me.
He seemed to be a little distressed, though, because he asked if I knew someone who needed a job. I said I didn't, and then before I left he still told me to send someone who needs a job. I said, "But I don't know anyone." And he cut me off like, "Send them to me!"
Even when on the days the restaurant is closed you will see his car parked there. He seems like the kind of guy who will do whatever it takes to succeed. So yeah, it's the climb, not just the end result.