- 4,079
- 179
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
Marshall Faulk cuh.
Who you got in their prime? Marshal Faulk or LaDanian Tomlinson
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Clyde Frog,
- Start date
- 13,432
- 224
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
Marshall.
bkmac
Banned
- 11,540
- 13
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2006
I'd take M. Faulk, but Tomlinson, even this season, has this burst when he runs to gain that extra yard
.
- 652
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
I'll take the guy that won a super bowl.
- 25,831
- 15,061
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
I never liked the Rams but I loved Marshall Faulk. He was a complete back, he could run north, south, east, west. He could go between tackles or bounce outside. He could line up as a WR & block like crazy. He was fast, shifty, & power all rolled into one. Dude was a beast & one of the very few bright spots on the NFL network.
LT, meh...He could carry the water bottles or the pads...
LT, meh...He could carry the water bottles or the pads...
- 4,272
- 719
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
like he wasnt good at WR either, and like he wasnt the best pass protector during his prime
he was also fast and shifty, dude could even play QB with a near perfect rating in his career. Dont get me wrong, im not disagreeing with you but to completely disregard 32 TDs in ONE season and saying he could carry his water bottle or pads is idiotic
- 6,247
- 2,048
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
Faulk.
- 25,831
- 15,061
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
& where did the 32 tds get him & the Chargers? No where. Look, LT was a good back. I was engaging in hyperboyle. Marshall Faulk led the Rams to 2 SBs & got one of them. He also knew when to walk away. It's sad to see how LT ended things with the Chargers & seeing him play for the Jets. It's kinda like seeing MJ play for the wizards...Originally Posted by Adrian1221
like he wasnt good at WR either, and like he wasnt the best pass protector during his prime
he was also fast and shifty, dude could even play QB with a near perfect rating in his career. Dont get me wrong, im not disagreeing with you but to completely disregard 32 TDs in ONE season and saying he could carry his water bottle or pads is idiotic
- 688
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2011
Marshall, Marshall, Marshall.
- 4,272
- 719
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
we are talking about primes though, the second half of your last post isnt relevant. That 32 td season he lead a first year starter qb (much like faulk with warner) to a 14-2 record except with less than stellar receivers, though. Keenan mcardell was way past his prime and vincent jackson was 2 years away from being called elite. They were one fumble away from a possible superbowl that the defense screwed up. He did his part. he was more than just "a good back"Originally Posted by psk2310
& where did the 32 tds get him & the Chargers? No where. Look, LT was a good back. I was engaging in hyperboyle. Marshall Faulk led the Rams to 2 SBs & got one of them.Originally Posted by Adrian1221
like he wasnt good at WR either, and like he wasnt the best pass protector during his prime
he was also fast and shifty, dude could even play QB with a near perfect rating in his career. Dont get me wrong, im not disagreeing with you but to completely disregard 32 TDs in ONE season and saying he could carry his water bottle or pads is idioticHe also knew when to walk away. It's sad to see how LT ended things with the Chargers & seeing him play for the Jets. It's kinda like seeing MJ play for the wizards...
- 1,146
- 49
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
LT for me, never really had the chance to catch up on faulk on his prime...
- 1,747
- 112
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2009
LT